John Logiudice wrote :
 
>I've recently set up a server on Linux using qmail 1.03.  Several =
>different users here received bounces like this one when sending mail:

>>  Hi. This is the qmail-send program at opalgroup.net.
>>  I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following =
>addresses.
>>  This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
>>
>>  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>  209.116.174.162 failed after I sent the message.
>>  Remote host said: 501 Badly structured mime attachment.
 
I have also encountered this, sending some stationaries (html formatted mail) with attachments  from express to sendmail (and only sendmail) servers - this happends not only from qmail - i tried to send from other servers too with the same result. anybody knows if this can be fixed from the sending server side (qmail in this case), so complicated mime-structured mail would be sent successfully to sendmail ?
 
Alex
 
Incredimail Admin.
-----Original Message-----
From: John Logiudice [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 11:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 501 Badly structured mime attachment

Hello,

I've recently set up a server on Linux using qmail 1.03.  Several =
different users here received bounces like this one when sending mail:

>  Hi. This is the qmail-send program at opalgroup.net.
>  I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following =
addresses.
>  This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
>
>  <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>  209.116.174.162 failed after I sent the message.
>  Remote host said: 501 Badly structured mime attachment.


Most attachments are going through fine, and the same users were able to =
send attachments to other recipients.  The attachments that had this =
trouble ranged in size from a 128kb .DOC file, to a 4mb .EPS file. =20

Although not a major problem -- yet -- I'd like to know if there is some =
configuration issue on my end that will prevent this.  All the users who =
had this trouble are using Outlook Express 5.

Please let me know if there is any more info I should supply.

Thanks,
John

Reply via email to