On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 04:48:03PM -0500, Russell Nelson wrote: > Markus Stumpf writes: > > While you're on it, will there be support for specifying qmtp connects > > via the smtproutes file? Maybe try qmtp first if the port is set to 209? > > I'm not sure it's necessary. smtproutes is only for misconfigured > hosts. Really? How about DNS over-rides for, eg, firewall relays? I agree that it's probably secondary, but not totally superfluous. One could argue that the same file should apply rather than having two separate files. And that the file should be renamed to dnsoverride. Regards.
- Re: thoughts for future qmail Jordan Krushen
- Re: thoughts for future qmail Timothy L. Mayo
- Re: thoughts for future qmail Russell Nelson
- qmtpd Justin Bell
- Re: qmtpd Russell Nelson
- Re: qmtpd Markus Stumpf
- Re: qmtpd Russell Nelson
- Re: qmtpd David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: qmtpd Mark Delany
- Re: qmtpd Bruce Guenter
- Re: qmtpd Mark Delany
- Re: qmtpd Russell Nelson
- Re: qmtpd Johan Almqvist
- Re: qmtpd Alex Pennace
- Re: qmtpd Johan Almqvist
- Re: qmtpd Alex Pennace
- Re: thoughts for future qmail Jurjen Oskam
- Re: thoughts for future qmail Dan Peterson
- Re: thoughts for future qmail Russell Nelson
- Re: thoughts for future qmail James Raftery
- QMTP protocol spec question David L. Nicol
