qmail Digest 5 Jan 2001 11:00:00 -0000 Issue 1235
Topics (messages 54673 through 54741):
Re: freaking MS crap
54673 by: George Patterson
multiple messages recieved
54674 by: B.Negr�o
54676 by: Henning Brauer
Forwarding
54675 by: Maciej Kozlowski
Re: Time zone
54677 by: -= Ana Paula =-
SMTP Authentication
54678 by: Huseyin YUCE
54679 by: Piotr Kasztelowicz
54692 by: Kris Kelley
URGENT = Help-me with this problems ! (relay-ctrl)
54680 by: -= Ana Paula =-
Relaying with xinetd
54681 by: Kari Suomela
BCC problem.
54682 by: Arjan Speelman
54683 by: James Raftery
Re: IS TIME_WAIT has somethings to do with qmail?
54684 by: Greg Owen
smtp forwarding among two servers...
54685 by: Sanjay Arora
multiple smtp connections & using the isp's server to send mail
54686 by: Sanjay Arora
54691 by: Charles Cazabon
qmail, smtp-send and PHP
54687 by: Johan Bj�rk
54688 by: Johan Bj�rk
54690 by: Charles Cazabon
Re: relaying by domain
54689 by: Kris Kelley
54737 by: ksemat
Can not receive email from hotmail.com only
54693 by: raypatima
54694 by: Charles Cazabon
54695 by: James Raftery
54696 by: Mark Delany
Re: thoughts for future qmail
54697 by: Johan Almqvist
54698 by: Henning Brauer
54724 by: Russell Nelson
54740 by: David Dyer-Bennet
qmail-ldap with openldap 2
54699 by: Pierre-Julien Grizel
54703 by: Henning Brauer
54706 by: Andre Oppermann
how do I unsubscribe here?
54700 by: ed lim
54738 by: ksemat
messages in queue not proccessed
54701 by: Greg Cope
E-mail through firewall
54702 by: Brett Randall
54705 by: Kris Kelley
54708 by: Brett Randall
54714 by: Rod... Whitworth
54725 by: Brett Randall
54727 by: Phil Barnett
54728 by: Brett Randall
54729 by: Phil Barnett
54739 by: David Dyer-Bennet
Re: Stress Test
54704 by: Brian Reichert
54720 by: Sean Reifschneider
54733 by: Michael Maier
54734 by: Michael Maier
54735 by: Sean Reifschneider
54736 by: Michael Maier
rcpthosts - IP addresses not allowed?
54707 by: Bernard Karmilowicz
54709 by: Andy Bradford
54710 by: Bernard Karmilowicz
Relay Help!!!
54711 by: Massao
Re: qmail-scanner
54712 by: Albert Hopkins
54726 by: Martin Lesser
tcpserver "protocol error"
54713 by: up.3.am
54715 by: Chris Johnson
54716 by: up.3.am
Qmail very slow????
54717 by: marchart.schotten.at
Qmail very slow???
54718 by: marchart.schotten.at
54719 by: Jose Celestino
qmail pop3d
54721 by: Boz Crowther
54722 by: Tim Hunter
Question about configuration of Qmail for relaying
54723 by: Kui
54741 by: Henning Brauer
qmail-inject
54730 by: Claus Beerta
Migration of Mailboxes and accounts
54731 by: Jean Claude YAO
qmail - ms sql server
54732 by: Jonor Lacuesta
Administrivia:
To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To bug my human owner, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To post to the list, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kurth, This virus that you speak of doesn't come from the sexxyfun.net but from an infected windows machine. Have a look in the full headers look for address in a received header.. However it will change for each infected machine that sends it. I contacted the ISP that the email originated from(one of their Dial-up customers). The dealt with it promptly. For more infomation, follow the URL below... http://www.datafellows.com/v-descs/hybris.htm Hope this throws some light on the subject... George Patterson PS: I agree with the subject line... HTML Email: Not needed, not wanted, Not appreciated Kurth Bemis wrote: > I own a ISP and we're having problems with the "Snowhite Virus" and > outlook users...its running rampant..from about 3 weeks back we got one > or 2 bounces a week..now we're up to 40 a day.... > > I have created a controls/badmailfrom and added [EMAIL PROTECTED] however > mail still goes though....any ideas why this isn't rejecting mail? > I have looked at the logs and it seems that qmail treats it as a regular > mail without checking... > > any ideas? > > ~kurth
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 20997 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2000 22:06:04 -0000
Received: from 14bis.plugway.com.br (HELO 14bis) (200.195.39.9)
by falcon.plugway.com.br with SMTP; 28 Dec 2000 22:06:04 -0000
Message-ID: <000c01c0711a$aa4c7640$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?B.Negr=E3o?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: teste
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 20:08:10 -0200message 2: name: 978041548.21061.falcon,S=2395Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 21059 invoked by uid 0); 28 Dec 2000 22:12:28 -0000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 20997 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2000 22:06:04 -0000
Received: from 14bis.plugway.com.br (HELO 14bis) (200.195.39.9)
by falcon.plugway.com.br with SMTP; 28 Dec 2000 22:06:04 -0000
Message-ID: <000c01c0711a$aa4c7640$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?B.Negr=E3o?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: teste
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 20:08:10 -0200message 3: name: 978041657.21087.falcon,S=2395Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 21078 invoked by uid 0); 28 Dec 2000 22:14:17 -0000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 20997 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2000 22:06:04 -0000
Received: from 14bis.plugway.com.br (HELO 14bis) (200.195.39.9)
by falcon.plugway.com.br with SMTP; 28 Dec 2000 22:06:04 -0000
Message-ID: <000c01c0711a$aa4c7640$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?B.Negr=E3o?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: teste
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 20:08:10 -0200message 4: name: 978041657.21089.falcon,S=2498Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 21085 invoked by uid 0); 28 Dec 2000 22:14:17 -0000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 21059 invoked by uid 0); 28 Dec 2000 22:12:28 -0000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 20997 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2000 22:06:04 -0000
Received: from 14bis.plugway.com.br (HELO 14bis) (200.195.39.9)
by falcon.plugway.com.br with SMTP; 28 Dec 2000 22:06:04 -0000
Message-ID: <000c01c0711a$aa4c7640$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?B.Negr=E3o?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: teste
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 20:08:10 -0200-------------------------------------------------
-- Bruno Negr�o -- Suporte
-- Plugway Acesso Internet Ltda.
-- (31)34812311
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am Donnerstag, 4. Januar 2001 12:37 schrieb B.Negr�o: > > Hy all, > > All my virtual e-mail account clients are complaining about recieving > multiple messages sometimes. And all the list members are complaining about receiving this email multiple times too. Do you really see a benefit from posting this again and again and again? If nobody answered the first time, nobody will answer the 2nd, 3rd and so on. Maybe you wan't to try the vpopmail mailing list. -- Henning Brauer | BS Web Services Hostmaster BSWS | Roedingsmarkt 14 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 20459 Hamburg www.bsws.de | Germany
Hi! I have a little problem. I'm trying to forward mail from local user maildir to remote address. I need to change "To:" field 'on the fly' I mean: when mail is forwarding from local [EMAIL PROTECTED] to remote [EMAIL PROTECTED] it comes with local user address in "To" header. How to change this? I know the .qmail commands &address and |prog but they doesn't work. Any ideas? Thx for advice. Maciej Kozlowski. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Alessander, Thursday, January 04, 2001, 8:36:37 AM, you wrote: AS> Hi all AS> Well, this is my firt time on the list. AS> I need a help. AS> I have the qmail on a linux red hat 6.2 . AS> All is fine except the time zone. AS> when i reboot my machine the time zone get one other set, not expected AS> my machine is set to GMT -3 America S�o Paulo. AS> It's not a hardware matter, and on other machines that have red hat 6.2 AS> whitout AS> qmail it not heappens. AS> Somebody knows about it ??? See: http://www.faqts.com/knowledge_base/view.phtml/aid/1167/fid/208 "How can I set the timezone used in headers? Why is the time wrong in headers? Mar 3rd, 2000 10:58 Dave Sill qmail uses Greenwich Mean Time (GMT), instead of the local timezone, in any timestamps it creates. This is indicated by the "-0000" at the end of the date specification. It means "no offset from GMT". (Eastern Standard Time has an offset of "-0500" which means five hours before GMT.) qmail uses GMT for two reasons: first, it makes it easier to track messages that pass through multiple timezones, and second, converting to the local timezone requires linking with the standard C runtime library, which DJB has gone to great lengths to avoid since it can be a source of security and reliability problems. There are two headers fields where qmail puts a time: Received and Date. qmail will only add a Date field to locally-injected (not SMTP) messages that don't already have a Date field. If you don't like the Date header qmail adds, either configure your mail user agent (MUA) to add them, or use the "datemail" command to inject messages instead of qmail-inject. Some people even replace qmail-inject with a symbolic link to datemail. Received fields are always stamped in UTC. Changing this would require a source code patch, and would be ill-advised for the reasons stated above." --- P.S: sou brasileira, se quiser trocar "figurinhas" sobre o qmail me procure ... estou come�ando a usa-lo em substituicao ao Sendmail. Ana Paula
Hi I use FreeBSD 4.2 OS end Qmail 1.03 (ported version) We have Installed Qmail and configured . It is Working fine. Now we need to Authenticate SMTP connections. How to go about? Is there any way to authenticate using unix password /etc/passwd Please send us details Thanks Huseyin YUCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message was sent using Postaci Webmail. (http://www.trlinux.com)
On 4 Jan 2001, Huseyin YUCE wrote: > We have Installed Qmail and configured . It is Working fine. Now we need > > to Authenticate SMTP connections. How to go about? Is there any way to > authenticate using unix password /etc/passwd Lack of identification system built-in to SMTP is "royal pain" of smtp security Piotr --- Piotr Kasztelowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [http://www.am.torun.pl/~pekasz]
Huseyin YUCE wrote: > > We have Installed Qmail and configured . It is Working fine. Now we need > > to Authenticate SMTP connections. How to go about? Is there any way to > > authenticate using unix password /etc/passwd Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote: > Lack of identification system built-in to SMTP is "royal pain" > of smtp security Authenticated SMTP is a reality, it just takes a patch to qmail and an appropriate checkpassword-compatable program to do it. Look at www.qmail.org/top.html and do a search for Krzysztof Dabrowski, the author of the best patch for ESMTP AUTH. ---Kris Kelley
-- I need urgently to configure the relay in the qmail and I'm not getting. My situation is the following: I have several users that are connected my server to receive and to send e-mails. Those users are not in my network. Everybody has dynamic IPs because they connect to the Internet through several others ISPs. For that reason I opted for the POP-before-SMTP authentication, and I installed the package "relay-ctrl". I followed all the instructions of the file "Readme": # gzip -dc relay-ctrl-2.5.tar.gz | tar xvf - # make # make root-install After, I put in crontab the followed lines: * * * * * /usr/sbin/relay-ctrl-age And, in the file /etc/rc.d/init.d/qmail, I insert the followed lines between "esac" and "exit 0": tcpserver -v -R 0 pop3 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup pop3.tecnohost.com.br \ /bin/checkpassword /usr/sbin/relay-ctrl-allow /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir 2>&1 | \ /var/qmail/bin/splogger pop3d & So, as nothing happened, I read all messages in the list archive about "relay-ctrl" and I discovered that was necessary to do more things than file "Readme" didn't explain: 1. Create the directory /etc/relay-ctrl 2. Create some files and put inside the /etc/relay-ctrl: 2.1. expiry 2.2. rule 2.3. rulesdir 2.4. smtpcdb 2.5. smtprules 2.6. spooldir 2.7. tcprules 3. Inside this files, put: 3.1. expiry = 900 3.2. rule = :allow,RELAYCLIENT='' 3.3. rulesdir = /etc 3.4. smtpcdb = tcp.smtp.cdb 3.5. smtprules = tcp.smtp 3.6. spooldir = /var/spool/relay-ctrl 3.7. tcprules = /usr/local/bin/tcprules 4. Create the directory /var/spool/relay-ctrl/ 5. After all, I reboot the computer. I would like to know if still need to do more some thing... 'Cause as I said before, in README it doesn't explain practically anything. Most of the things that I did was through the messages of that list. As if I was joining pieces of a puzzle. I ask that, because the things are not still working. :-((( See what it's already working: 1. The users can receive messages from any domain out of my network. 2. The users can send messages for any domain out of my network. See what is not still working: 1. The users can send messages without receive first. 2. Inside the /var/spool/relay-ctrl/ a file is created with the name of the address IP that is using the e-mail in the moment. But this file stay empty (is that correct?) and is not never deleted. Please help me! I'm there are days trying to solve that without success. I don't know more than to do. -- Thanks, Ana Paula
Saturday December 30 2000 20:59, Jeff Lacy wrote to All: JL> make xinetd relay, then it is really simple. You must use the JL> only_from option and the env option The important one is the env JL> option. My smtp thing looks like this: JL> # default: on JL> service smtp JL> { JL> disable = no JL> socket_type = stream JL> protocol = tcp JL> wait = no JL> user = qmaild JL> server = /var/qmail/bin/tcp-env JL> server_args = /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd JL> only_from = 192.168.0.0 JL> env = RELAYCLIENT="" With the last line as is, the messages get bounced, because 'domain <domain.com""> cannot be found'. Removing the "" seems to cure it. KS
Hi, We are experiencing the following problem: When using Exhange 5.5 to send mail through qmail 1.03 and then reading the mail with Netscape any version the following happens. If the user decides to send a mail and add BCC-recipients the BCC-recipients will show up in the mail in Netscape. Here you find the mail as it's received in Netscape Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 26034 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2001 12:54:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pc_02312) (192.168.7.43) by mail.nmc.kpn.net with SMTP; 4 Jan 2001 12:54:18 -0000 Received: by pc_02312 with Microsoft Mail id <01C07654.79FB0BC0@pc_02312>; Thu, 4 Jan 2001 13:44:36 +0100 Message-ID: <01C07654.79FB0BC0@pc_02312> From: BBT/IP Osu Internal Networks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> BCC: 'arjan' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 'ramon' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: BCC test Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 13:44:34 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mozilla-Status: 8001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 X-UIDL: 1cb41d00d38ea2523f7574bc33963bc7 Has anyone else experienced this problem. Does anyone have any solutions to this problem. For more info just ask. Krietings, Arjan Speelman E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 03:01:31PM +0100, Arjan Speelman wrote: > When using Exhange 5.5 to send mail through qmail 1.03 and then reading the > mail with Netscape any version the following happens. > If the user decides to send a mail and add BCC-recipients the BCC-recipients > will show up in the mail in Netscape. [snip] > Has anyone else experienced this problem. Hi Arjan, The sending MUA should remove the Bcc header line before submitting the message to the MTA. The Bcc field should only be used by the MUA to construct the envelope. > Does anyone have any solutions to this problem. Use an MUA that does the right thing. james -- James Raftery (JBR54) "Managing 4000 customer domains with BIND has been a lot like herding cats." - Mike Batchelor, on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I have a lot of TIME_WAIT (TCP/IP) on my mail server. And > this grow with time, I think that it well crash my server. > > I'm asking if this has no relation with qmail? TIME_WAIT means that a connection has been closed but the server is hanging around for a little bit to clear up any packets that belong to that connection. Look at the TIME_WAIT lines: Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State tcp 0 0 192.168.1.2:25 10.10.0.3:1070 TIME_WAIT If 'Local Address' has :25 after it, then yes, it was a mail connection that is waiting to be cleaned up. If it has a different port, then it is a different type of connection. Seeing some of these is not necessarily an indication of a problem. Seeing a large number of these may indicate a problem. -- gowen -- Greg Owen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] SoftLock.com is now DigitalGoods!
We have two Linux servers using dial up links to connect to the net. One is using qmail & other is using sendmail. Sometimes one is not connected to the net & sometimes the other is not. We want that each of the offline servers should forward its mail to the server connected to the net. Preferably this should be automated but even a minor configuration change that can be scripted is acceptable. Does anybody have a suggestion how this can be implemented. With best regards. Sanjay.
We use qmail on RH Linux 6.2 and connect through multiple isps....use the isp giving the best connection at the time... I want qmail to initiate multiple smtp sessions so as to send mail faster. How to accomplish this through a dial-up connection? Also, my server makes a direct smtp connection & I want to configure it to use my isp's server for forwarding the mail. Also, if this can be configure to accomodate possibility of different isp's being dialled...it would be great. Hope someone can give me some pointers. With best regards. Sanjay.
Sanjay Arora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I want qmail to initiate multiple smtp sessions so as to send mail faster. > How to accomplish this through a dial-up connection? qmail already does this. No configuration necessary. However, you may want to raise your concurrencyremote limit if you are latency bound instead of bandwidth bound. Read `man qmail-send` for more details. Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hello folks. I'm trying to send emails with PHP (Linux) through a remote mailserver running qmail 1.03. I'm using the smtp-send class by M Lemos. The problem is that ALL emails being sent get a weird header at the first line: Return-Path: <"johan <johan"@mail.johanbjork.com> Exactly like that it looks! And I'm not trying to set that header in PHP. Even if I do, it still look as bad. If I use exactly the same code but send mail through another mail server (one running sendmail), everything works fine. So I wonder if anyone knows what possibly could be wrong? --- Johan Bj�rk
Actually, the log file says the following: Jan 4 16:43:18 mail qmail: 978622998.812528 info msg 34119: bytes 406 from <johan_<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 1193 3 uid 502 So it's a bit strange I reccon. Would appreciate some help. --- Johan Bj�rk -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Fr�n: Johan Bj�rk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Datum: den 4 januari 2001 16:47 �mne: qmail, smtp-send and PHP >Hello folks. > >I'm trying to send emails with PHP (Linux) through a remote mailserver running qmail >1.03. I'm using the smtp-send class by M Lemos. The problem is that ALL emails being >sent get a weird header at the first line: > >Return-Path: <"johan <johan"@mail.johanbjork.com> > >Exactly like that it looks! And I'm not trying to set that header in PHP. Even if I >do, it still look as bad. If I use exactly the same code but send mail through >another mail server (one running sendmail), everything works fine. > >So I wonder if anyone knows what possibly could be wrong? > >--- >Johan Bj�rk >
Johan Bj�rk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Please try to limit your line length to 78 chars or so. Your long lines make for a little trouble in reading/replying. > I'm trying to send emails with PHP (Linux) through a remote mailserver > running qmail 1.03. I'm using the smtp-send class by M Lemos. The problem is > that ALL emails being sent get a weird header at the first line: > Return-Path: <"johan <johan"@mail.johanbjork.com> > > Exactly like that it looks! And I'm not trying to set that header in PHP. I'm not familiar with the class you refer to, but qmail constructs the Return-Path: header from the envelope sender. It looks like your envelope sender is in a non-standard format, like: "Comment" <address> which is fine for From: and To: headers, but not for the envelope sender or recipient. Specify the envelope sender as only <address> and it might work better. Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have you considered authenticated SMTP? That way clients would have to verify themselves each time they sent out a message, similar to the POP login procedure. There is a very good patch for qmail that enables the ESMTP AUTH command, written by Krzysztof Dabrowski, available at www.qmail.org/top.html. Personally I think that ESMTP AUTH is a much cleaner way of doing things than SMTP-after-POP, and most major mail clients support it, including Outlook and Outlook Express. ---Kris
> Have you considered authenticated SMTP? That way clients would have to I hadn't. Thanks. I will look into it as well.
I have set up the qmail_vpopmail and everything run fine under tcpcontrol. Only strange thing happend is that I can send mail from any virtual user to hotmail.com but can not get any mail from hotmail. If hotmail user send the email to my server it will generate the following error. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unicode-1-1-utf-7 This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: message/delivery-status Reporting-MTA: dns;mail.hotmail.com Received-From-MTA: dns;mail.hotmail.com Arrival-Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 06:38:42 -0800 Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Content-Type: message/rfc822 I've setup the MX record to point to mail server like this (my server IP is 203.107.225.12) > set type=mx > east-thai.com Non-authoritative answer: east-thai.com preference = 0, mail exchanger = 203.107.225.12 Authoritative answers can be found from: east-thai.com nameserver = NS1.CENTRALINFO.NET east-thai.com nameserver = NS2.CENTRALINFO.NET NS1.CENTRALINFO.NET internet address = 63.102.200.2 NS2.CENTRALINFO.NET internet address = 63.102.204.130 any clue what happended here?? any help will be appreciated. -- raypatima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
raypatima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Only strange thing happend is that I can send mail from any virtual user > to hotmail.com but can not get any mail from hotmail. If hotmail user > send the email to my server it will generate the following error. > > set type=mx > > east-thai.com > Non-authoritative answer: > east-thai.com preference = 0, mail exchanger = 203.107.225.12 Doesn't an MX record have to point to an A record? Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. -----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 12:08:31AM +0700, raypatima wrote: > > set type=mx > > east-thai.com > Non-authoritative answer: > east-thai.com preference = 0, mail exchanger = 203.107.225.12 The value of an MX record is a fully qualified domain name, not an IP address. Update your MX record set to use names only. james -- James Raftery (JBR54) "Managing 4000 customer domains with BIND has been a lot like herding cats." - Mike Batchelor, on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 12:08:31AM +0700, raypatima wrote: > I have set up the qmail_vpopmail and everything run fine under > tcpcontrol. > Only strange thing happend is that I can send mail from any virtual user > to hotmail.com but can not get any mail from hotmail. If hotmail user > send the email to my server it will generate the following error. > > I've setup the MX record to point to mail server like this (my server IP > is 203.107.225.12) > > > > set type=mx > > east-thai.com > Non-authoritative answer: > east-thai.com preference = 0, mail exchanger = 203.107.225.12 > > Authoritative answers can be found from: > east-thai.com nameserver = NS1.CENTRALINFO.NET > east-thai.com nameserver = NS2.CENTRALINFO.NET > NS1.CENTRALINFO.NET internet address = 63.102.200.2 > NS2.CENTRALINFO.NET internet address = 63.102.204.130 > > any clue what happended here?? any help will be appreciated. By the looks, raypatima has fixed the problem - no doubt with the help of a few on this list - but I'd like to add that raypatima made life very easy for everyone simply because he chose to supply the real domain name rather than cloak it. Thanks rapatima. You did the right thing, I hope it helped solve your problem quickly. Regards.
On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 09:16:14AM -0500, Russell Nelson wrote: > If I can get twenty people to implement it, AND insert an MX record > for their qmtpd with one of the following priorities, then I'll commit > to implementing a qmail-remote that also talks QMTP. Okay, and when can we have it? -Johan, restless -- Johan Almqvist
Am Donnerstag, 4. Januar 2001 19:57 schrieb Johan Almqvist: > On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 09:16:14AM -0500, Russell Nelson wrote: > > If I can get twenty people to implement it, AND insert an MX record > > for their qmtpd with one of the following priorities, then I'll commit > > to implementing a qmail-remote that also talks QMTP. > Okay, and when can we have it? Hey, give him the time. I prefer a secure and reliable solution rather than a quick one. > -Johan, restless -- Henning Brauer | BS Web Services Hostmaster BSWS | Roedingsmarkt 14 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 20459 Hamburg www.bsws.de | Germany
Johan Almqvist writes: > On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 09:16:14AM -0500, Russell Nelson wrote: > > If I can get twenty people to implement it, AND insert an MX record > > for their qmtpd with one of the following priorities, then I'll commit > > to implementing a qmail-remote that also talks QMTP. > > Okay, and when can we have it? http://qmail.org/qmail-1.03-qmtpc.patch qmtp seems to be about twice as fast as smtp in terms of the amount of time a message spends sitting in the queue. -- -russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com | Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | A bacon cheeseburger is 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | offensive to every major Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | religion.
Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 5 January 2001 at 01:41:53 -0500 > Johan Almqvist writes: > > On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 09:16:14AM -0500, Russell Nelson wrote: > > > If I can get twenty people to implement it, AND insert an MX record > > > for their qmtpd with one of the following priorities, then I'll commit > > > to implementing a qmail-remote that also talks QMTP. > > > > Okay, and when can we have it? > > http://qmail.org/qmail-1.03-qmtpc.patch I can't get this via Lynx (so I had to download it on my windows machine and move it over; trivial for a file this size). I can get the file displayed, but I can't save it any way I've tried. Creating my own html with a link would let me download it and save it, but the other workaround was easier. > qmtp seems to be about twice as fast as smtp in terms of the amount of > time a message spends sitting in the queue. Cool. -- David Dyer-Bennet / Welcome to the future! / [EMAIL PROTECTED] SF: http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/ Minicon: http://www.mnstf.org/minicon/ Photos: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/
Has anyone ever tried to make qmail-ldap work with openldap 2 ? Is it okay to make it work without problem ? I've got qmail-ldap working with openldap 1.xx for one year and a half and never had any problem. Many thanks, P.-J. -- If the only tool you have is a hammer, you tend to see every problem as a nail. Si le seul outil dont vous disposez est un marteau, vous avez tendance � voir chaque probl�me comme un clou. --Abraham Maslow
Am Donnerstag, 4. Januar 2001 18:57 schrieb Pierre-Julien Grizel: > Has anyone ever tried to make qmail-ldap work with openldap 2 ? Is it > okay to make it work without problem ? Please use the qmail-ldap mailing list for qmail-ldap specifica. It is possible to run qmail-ldap with OpenLDAP 2.x, the newest patch 20010101 has the needed schemas included - with officially IANA assigned OIDs. > I've got qmail-ldap working with openldap 1.xx for one year and a half > and never had any problem. > > > > Many thanks, > > > P.-J. -- Henning Brauer | BS Web Services Hostmaster BSWS | Roedingsmarkt 14 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 20459 Hamburg www.bsws.de | Germany
Pierre-Julien Grizel wrote: > > Has anyone ever tried to make qmail-ldap work with openldap 2 ? Is it > okay to make it work without problem ? > > I've got qmail-ldap working with openldap 1.xx for one year and a half > and never had any problem. qmail-ldap and OpenLDAP 2 is fine. No problems. -- Andre
How do I unsubscribe from this mailing list?
mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, ed lim wrote: > How do I unsubscribe from this mailing list? > > >
Dear All I've setup quite a few qmail mail servers and have the following problem the output of qmail-qstat gives : root@elrond:/home/greg/qmail > /var/qmail/bin/qmail-qstat messages in queue: 0 messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 23 All these machines appear to have unproccessed messages in the queue - yet they all work fine. They were all setup using LWQ. Any clues appreaciated Regards Greg Cope A look at the mailing list archive suggest that qmail-remote is not going but: root 254 0.0 0.1 1052 360 ? S 2000 0:00 svscan root 263 0.0 0.1 1016 316 ? S 2000 0:00 supervise qmail-send root 264 0.0 0.1 1016 316 ? S 2000 0:00 supervise log root 265 0.0 0.1 1016 316 ? S 2000 0:00 supervise qmail-smtpd root 266 0.0 0.1 1016 316 ? S 2000 0:00 supervise log qmails 267 0.0 0.1 1092 428 ? S 2000 0:00 qmail-send qmaild 268 0.0 0.1 1084 484 ? S 2000 0:01 /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -l elrond.mailtrack.com -v -H -R -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -qmaill 274 0.0 0.1 1028 308 ? S 2000 0:00 /usr/local/bin/multilog t n50 s1024000 /var/log/qmail qmaill 275 0.0 0.1 1032 372 ? S 2000 0:00 /usr/local/bin/multilog t n50 s1024000 /var/log/qmail/smtpd root 276 0.0 0.1 1052 356 ? S 2000 0:00 qmail-lspawn ./Mailbox qmailr 277 0.0 0.1 1048 364 ? S 2000 0:00 qmail-rspawn qmailq 278 0.0 0.1 1028 364 ? S 2000 0:00 qmail-clean ####### logs below The logs say [TM]: ==> /var/log/qmail/current <== 2000-12-29 02:33:40.423933500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/220 2000-12-31 16:07:07.350241500 status: exiting 2000-12-31 16:08:16.532407500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/220 ==> /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current <== 2001-01-04 18:08:05.925578500 tcpserver: status: 1/20 2001-01-04 18:08:05.925896500 tcpserver: pid 16602 from 213.253.135.2 2001-01-04 18:08:05.926096500 tcpserver: ok 16602 elrond.mailtrack.com:213.253.135.4:25 :213.253.135.2::3681 2001-01-04 18:08:05.928096500 tcpserver: end 16602 status 0 2001-01-04 18:08:05.928137500 tcpserver: status: 0/20 2001-01-04 18:09:05.906505500 tcpserver: status: 1/20 2001-01-04 18:09:05.906830500 tcpserver: pid 16603 from 213.253.135.2 2001-01-04 18:09:05.907044500 tcpserver: ok 16603 elrond.mailtrack.com:213.253.135.4:25 :213.253.135.2::3738 2001-01-04 18:09:05.909053500 tcpserver: end 16603 status 0 2001-01-04 18:09:05.909093500 tcpserver: status: 0/20
Hi all I have a problem. Optus@Home in Australia (one of two cable internet providers) have decided to firewall port 25 traffic (incoming) to their entire network except for their own mail servers. This means my mail server is virtually useless. They have blocked smtp traffic since their entire IP range was being listed with ORBS and other open relay databases since their users were operating open relays. I'll agree, the network is run like crap since Optus let this happen in the first place, but the other alternative (Telstra) is not any better by a long shot. I have provided a temporary work around, setting up my work mail server as the primary MX then routing to a different port, on my Optus@Home server, which I am now running qmail on. This works, but it is not very nice. Does anyone have any ideas how I can get out of this problem with Optus firewalling port 25? Or is the way I have just described the only perceivable way of doing this (the latter would be my thinking, but I ask in hope of the former). It would be nice (however dumb and time-and-resource-wasting) if I could tell clients coming to my server to use a different port for their SMTP connection, but I haven't seen anything even slightly to this degree in all my walkings. Thanks in advance -- B r e t t R a n d a l l http://xbox.ipsware.com/ brett _ @ _ ipsware.com
Brett Randall wrote: > I have a problem. Optus@Home in Australia (one of two cable internet > providers) have decided to firewall port 25 traffic (incoming) to > their entire network except for their own mail servers. This means my > mail server is virtually useless... Maybe ask the administration nicely to open up port 25 for certain IPs if the machine passes an open relay test? ---Kris Kelley
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Brett Randall wrote: >> I have a problem. Optus@Home in Australia (one of two cable >> internet providers) have decided to firewall port 25 traffic >> (incoming) to their entire network except for their own mail >> servers. This means my mail server is virtually useless... > > Maybe ask the administration nicely to open up port 25 for certain > IPs if the machine passes an open relay test? If no less personal solutions are available, then I will try it. Getting to talk to the administration of telcorp's here in Australia is harder than finding a tinny of VB in Alaska at the moment. They don't particularly care about their customers, and they know that (at the moment), there are only two cable providers in the whole country and both are as crap as the other. However, thanks for the suggestion. I may yet have no other alternative. -- B r e t t R a n d a l l http://xbox.ipsware.com/ brett _ @ _ ipsware.com
On 05 Jan 2001 04:55:18 +1100, Brett Randall wrote: >>> I have a problem. Optus@Home in Australia (one of two cable >>> internet providers) have decided to firewall port 25 traffic >>> (incoming) to their entire network except for their own mail >>> servers. This means my mail server is virtually useless... >> >> Maybe ask the administration nicely to open up port 25 for certain >> IPs if the machine passes an open relay test? > >If no less personal solutions are available, then I will try >it. Getting to talk to the administration of telcorp's here in >Australia is harder than finding a tinny of VB in Alaska at the >moment. They don't particularly care about their customers, and they >know that (at the moment), there are only two cable providers in the >whole country and both are as crap as the other. > I was told that running servers on either of the cable networks was contrary to their AUPs so my mailserver runs on a 'permanent' dial-up to BPD which is enough bandwidth for my 20 or so family accounts and for various other uses. It also gives me a range of static IPs and an IN-ADDR classless routing lookup for the names. Anyway this is OT.. time to go.
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > What I have done is provide a ghost port for 25 and 110 on 8025 > and 8110, so when you are using a provider that blocks 25 and/or > 110, you set your email to use the alternate port, which is not > blocked. This still doesn't help incoming mail, though, does it? I mean, people sending mail to your mail server can't reach it if port 25 is closed by the ISP. Do you know any ways around this or is the way I mentioned in my first post the only way? Thanks -- B r e t t R a n d a l l http://xbox.ipsware.com/ brett _ @ _ ipsware.com
On 5 Jan 2001, at 17:07, Brett Randall wrote: > On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > What I have done is provide a ghost port for 25 and 110 on 8025 > > and 8110, so when you are using a provider that blocks 25 and/or > > 110, you set your email to use the alternate port, which is not > > blocked. > > This still doesn't help incoming mail, though, does it? I mean, people > sending mail to your mail server can't reach it if port 25 is closed > by the ISP. Do you know any ways around this or is the way I mentioned > in my first post the only way? My server is colocated on a direct connection to the internet, so there is no blockage at the server. Never has been. So far, this has been a client side issue. Is your server behind an ISP firewall? -- Phil Barnett mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW http://www.the-oasis.net/ FTP Site ftp://ftp.the-oasis.net
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 5 Jan 2001, at 17:07, Brett Randall wrote: > >> On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> > What I have done is provide a ghost port for 25 and 110 on 8025 >> > and 8110, so when you are using a provider that blocks 25 and/or >> > 110, you set your email to use the alternate port, which is not >> > blocked. >> >> This still doesn't help incoming mail, though, does it? I mean, >> people sending mail to your mail server can't reach it if port 25 >> is closed by the ISP. Do you know any ways around this or is the >> way I mentioned in my first post the only way? > > My server is colocated on a direct connection to the internet, so > there is no blockage at the server. Never has been. > > So far, this has been a client side issue. > > Is your server behind an ISP firewall? Yep, that's where the problem occurs. All of a sudden, incoming e-mail is blocked and I have to work a way around it (the current way works, but is messy and slow). -- B r e t t R a n d a l l http://xbox.ipsware.com/ brett _ @ _ ipsware.com
On 5 Jan 2001, at 17:28, Brett Randall wrote: > On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > On 5 Jan 2001, at 17:07, Brett Randall wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> > >> > What I have done is provide a ghost port for 25 and 110 on 8025 > >> > and 8110, so when you are using a provider that blocks 25 and/or > >> > 110, you set your email to use the alternate port, which is not > >> > blocked. > >> > >> This still doesn't help incoming mail, though, does it? I mean, > >> people sending mail to your mail server can't reach it if port 25 > >> is closed by the ISP. Do you know any ways around this or is the > >> way I mentioned in my first post the only way? > > > > My server is colocated on a direct connection to the internet, so > > there is no blockage at the server. Never has been. > > > > So far, this has been a client side issue. > > > > Is your server behind an ISP firewall? > > Yep, that's where the problem occurs. All of a sudden, incoming e-mail > is blocked and I have to work a way around it (the current way works, > but is messy and slow). I believe that at that point, I'd consider my colocated server crippled and I would fire them. Good colo's are easy to find. -- Phil Barnett mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW http://www.the-oasis.net/ FTP Site ftp://ftp.the-oasis.net
Brett Randall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 5 January 2001 at 17:28:56 +1100 > Yep, that's where the problem occurs. All of a sudden, incoming e-mail > is blocked and I have to work a way around it (the current way works, > but is messy and slow). Other than being dependent on yet another system to get your email, what does this actually hurt? (That one reason may be enough for you to want to put up with it; you know your needs best. I'm just trying to be sure I'm not overlooking some consequence.) -- David Dyer-Bennet / Welcome to the future! / [EMAIL PROTECTED] SF: http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/ Minicon: http://www.mnstf.org/minicon/ Photos: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 10:11:37AM +0100, Michael Maier wrote: > Hi People! > I was running the following Perl Script for Stress Test qmail: > > [...] > > But when I run it worked fine. 50k.data is a File with 50 KB Random > Data. > The e-Mails have not been send out. I'm confused. You say, 'it worked fine', then you say 'email has not been sent'. Which is it? > So what I wanna know is if the qmail server blocks the Spam to that > Mailbox? > I really need to know where the Bottleneck is because I need to sendout > 500.000 Mails in 36 hrs. If you are sending a an identical message to 500,000 people, consider one message with a half-million recipients, rather that trying to inject a half-million messages in the queue. > Thanks, > Michael. -- Brian 'you Bastard' Reichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 37 Crystal Ave. #303 Daytime number: (603) 434-6842 Derry NH 03038-1713 USA Intel architecture: the left-hand path
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 10:11:37AM +0100, Michael Maier wrote: > system 'qmail-inject $addr < 50k.data'; Does 50k.data have a Mail header on it? Just a guess... >I really need to know where the Bottleneck is because I need to sendout >500.000 Mails in 36 hrs. Good luck... I hope your ISP doesn't mind you pushing 25GB of data in 36 hours. Sean -- YOU ARE WITNESSING A FRONT THREE-QUARTER VIEW OF TWO ADULTS SHARING A TENDER MOMENT. -- Gordon Cole, _Twin_Peaks_ Sean Reifschneider, Inimitably Superfluous <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tummy.com - Linux Consulting since 1995. Qmail, KRUD, Firewalls, Python
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 10:11:37AM +0100, Michael Maier wrote: > > system 'qmail-inject $addr < 50k.data'; > > Does 50k.data have a Mail header on it? Just a guess... No, it hasn't a Mail Header in it. I think maybe it will be solved by putting some additional random Chars in Front of the File. > >I really need to know where the Bottleneck is because I need to sendout > >500.000 Mails in 36 hrs. > > Good luck... I hope your ISP doesn't mind you pushing 25GB of data in > 36 hours. They don't mind because it's colocated Hosting and we pay much Money for it and Traffic is not billed. Billed is the load of the Line. (Bandwidth Usage) > Sean
> I'm confused. You say, 'it worked fine', then you say 'email has > not been sent'. Which is it? Sorry! I forgot to right down it worked fine when sending about 100 Messages. > If you are sending a an identical message to 500,000 people, consider > one message with a half-million recipients, rather that trying to > inject a half-million messages in the queue. Message is unique currently but final Messages will be personalized. CU, Michael!
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 09:45:20AM +0100, Michael Maier wrote: >No, it hasn't a Mail Header in it. Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winner. Sean -- Q: What kind of dog goes "BOFH! BOFH!"? A: A rootweiler Sean Reifschneider, Inimitably Superfluous <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tummy.com - Linux Consulting since 1995. Qmail, KRUD, Firewalls, Python
> >No, it hasn't a Mail Header in it. > > Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winner. > > Sean But why it works for 100 Mails then ? Michael..
I am trying to send mail from host FROM_HOST (1.2.3.4) to host TO_HOST (1.2.3.5). The mail is addressed to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". qmail is running on both hosts. Unfortunately, TO_HOST refuses the mail. However, TO_HOST will accept the mail if it is addressed to "user@domain". Both the qmail/control/rcpthosts and qmail/control/locals files on TO_HOST contain: [1.2.3.5] domain The following is a snip of the error message presented by FROM_HOST when TO_HOST rejects mail addressed in the form "user@ip_address" rather than "user@domain": Hi. This is the qmail-send program at FROM_HOST. I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 1.2.3.5 does not like recipient. Remote host said: 553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1) Giving up on 1.2.3.5. Is there additional information I must add to the qmail/control/rcpthosts file on TO_HOST to coax TO_HOST into accepting mail addressed in the form "user@ip_address"? Thanks! - Bernie
On Thu, 04 Jan 2001 13:38:56 EST, Bernard Karmilowicz wrote: > I am trying to send mail from host FROM_HOST (1.2.3.4) to host TO_HOST > (1.2.3.5). The mail is addressed to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". qmail is running on > both hosts. Unfortunately, TO_HOST refuses the mail. However, TO_HOST > will accept the mail if it is addressed to "user@domain". Try sending to user@[1.2.3.5] instead... Andy
Thanks much, Andy. Your suggestion worked! - Bernie > > I am trying to send mail from host FROM_HOST (1.2.3.4) to host TO_HOST > > (1.2.3.5). The mail is addressed to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". qmail is running on > > both hosts. Unfortunately, TO_HOST refuses the mail. However, TO_HOST > > will accept the mail if it is addressed to "user@domain". > > Try sending to user@[1.2.3.5] instead... > > Andy
>Please, > >I'm using a e-mail server running qmail-1.03. How can I implement relay control using the spamcontrol patch. >The problem is that I need to allow any mail for or from my domain and relay from some IP addresses only. >I've alredy looked at README.SPAMCONTROL but the qmail is only looking for the rcpthosts file > > >Thanks > >Vidal Melo >
Yes. On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 05:14:36PM +0800, KIM wrote: > > anybody here installed the qmail-scanner without problem? > -- Albert Hopkins Sr. Systems Specialist Dynacare Laboratories [EMAIL PROTECTED]
KIM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > anybody here installed the qmail-scanner without problem? Yes. With AvpDaemon it works well. Martin
I just happened to be changing my tcpserver rc file today (adding -H for pop3d) and when I restarted, watched the console for a while, and noticed this somewhat alarming message: rblsmtpd: pid 93906: 553 Open relay! pil.net does not accept email from unsecured relays listed in the rss - see <URL:http://www.mail-abuse.org/cgi-bin/nph-rss?207.138.176.16> tcpserver: warning: dropping connection, unable to read /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb: protocol error Is that protocol error a normal part of how rblsmtpd works? Everything *seems* to be working ok... James Smallacombe PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://3.am =========================================================================
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 04:00:35PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I just happened to be changing my tcpserver rc file today (adding -H for > pop3d) and when I restarted, watched the console for a while, and noticed > this somewhat alarming message: > > rblsmtpd: pid 93906: 553 Open relay! pil.net does not accept email from > unsecured relays listed in the rss - see > <URL:http://www.mail-abuse.org/cgi-bin/nph-rss?207.138.176.16> > tcpserver: warning: dropping connection, unable to read /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb: > protocol error > > Is that protocol error a normal part of how rblsmtpd works? Everything > *seems* to be working ok... That's not right. What does your startup script look like? Why is rblsmtpd involved in your POP startup script, anyway? Or do you start all of your various tcpservers from one script? Chris
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Chris Johnson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 04:00:35PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I just happened to be changing my tcpserver rc file today (adding -H for > > pop3d) and when I restarted, watched the console for a while, and noticed > > this somewhat alarming message: > > > > rblsmtpd: pid 93906: 553 Open relay! pil.net does not accept email from > > unsecured relays listed in the rss - see > > <URL:http://www.mail-abuse.org/cgi-bin/nph-rss?207.138.176.16> > > tcpserver: warning: dropping connection, unable to read /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb: > > protocol error > > > > Is that protocol error a normal part of how rblsmtpd works? Everything > > *seems* to be working ok... > > That's not right. What does your startup script look like? Why is rblsmtpd > involved in your POP startup script, anyway? Or do you start all of your > various tcpservers from one script? yes, one script: #!/bin/sh /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u 1003 -g 1002 0 25 \ /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -b -rdul.maps.vix.com \ /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -b -r 'relays.mail-abuse.org:Open relay! pil.net does not accept email from unsecured relays listed in the rss - see <URL:http://www.mail-abuse.org/cgi-bin/nph-rss?%IP%> ' \ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd & /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -H 0 pop3 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup \ richard2.pil.net /home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir & James Smallacombe PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://3.am =========================================================================
Hi! Does anybody has an idea why my qmail-setup performs so poorly? 200 messages take 300 seconds to be delivered locally on a Athlon 800MHz 128MB Ram running FreeBSD 4.2 OS.
Hi again, Why are so many messages not preprocessed? THX mail: ~/perl $ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-qstat messages in queue: 196 messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 88 mail: ~/perl $ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-qstat messages in queue: 194 messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 77 mail: ~/perl $ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-qstat messages in queue: 191 messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 38 mail: ~/perl $ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-qstat messages in queue: 190 messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 28 mail: ~/perl $ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-qstat messages in queue: 188 messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 11 mail: ~/perl $ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-qstat messages in queue: 186 messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 2 mail: ~/perl $ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-qstat messages in queue: 185 messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 2 mail: ~/perl $ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-qstat messages in queue: 185 messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 2 mail: ~/perl $ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-qstat messages in queue: 180 messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 3 mail: ~/perl $ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-qstat messages in queue: 180 messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 3 mail: ~/perl $ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-qstat messages in queue: 178 messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 3 mail: ~/perl $ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-qstat messages in queue: 175 messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 3 mail: ~/perl $ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-qstat messages in queue: 166 messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 2 mail: ~/perl $ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-qstat messages in queue: 160 messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 4 mail: ~/perl $ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-qstat messages in queue: 163 messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 7 mail: ~/perl $ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-qstat messages in queue: 152 messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 3 mail: ~/perl $ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-qstat messages in queue: 149 messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 0 mail: ~/perl $ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-qstat messages in queue: 119 messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 0 mail: ~/perl $ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-qstat messages in queue: 81 messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 0 mail: ~/perl $ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-qstat messages in queue: 49 messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 0 mail: ~/perl $ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-qstat messages in queue: 9 messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 0 mail: ~/perl $ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-qstat messages in queue: 0 messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 0
Your logs? And the output of qmail-showctl... On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 11:41:15PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi again, > > Why are so many messages not preprocessed? > > THX > > mail: ~/perl $ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-qstat > messages in queue: 196 > messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 88 > mail: ~/perl $ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-qstat > messages in queue: 194 > messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 77 > mail: ~/perl $ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-qstat > messages in queue: 191 (...) -- Jose AP Celestino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> || SAPO / PTM.COM Administra��o de Sistemas / Opera��es || http://www.sapo.pt ----------------------------------------------------------- "World domination. Fast" (By Linus Torvalds)
/bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir &I've tried putting in in /var/qmail/rc, /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run and running it from a command line, but the only one that works is the third option (which is obviously unsatisfactory).I realize this is a pretty newbie question, and thank you in advance for your help.
/bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir &I've tried putting in in /var/qmail/rc, /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run and running it from a command line, but the only one that works is the third option (which is obviously unsatisfactory).I realize this is a pretty newbie question, and thank you in advance for your help.
I am a fresh user of Qmail and I have some question when I configurate it. I
hope you may help me to solve these problem. Thx.
1) I have setup a Qmail and the domain of the mail server is mail.abc.com
(abc is not the true domain)
and now I want the users of def.com can also use the smtp service of my
Qmail server. I have started the tcpserver with the following rules:
192.168.0.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
def.com:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
abc:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
:allow
Nevertheless, the smtp server still doesn't work. I just want the user with
the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] can send email through my Qmail server. What
other things I need to do or where can I seek for help?
Thank you very much if you can help me!!!
cheers,
CK
Am Freitag, 5. Januar 2001 07:35 schrieb Kui: > > I am a fresh user of Qmail and I have some question when I configurate it. > I > hope you may help me to solve these problem. Thx. > 1) I have setup a Qmail and the domain of the mail server is mail.abc.com > (abc is not the true domain) It makes really no sense to hide your real domain when requesting help here. > and now I want the users of def.com can also use the smtp service of my > Qmail server. I have started the tcpserver with the following rules: > 192.168.0.:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" > def.com:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" > abc:allow,RELAYCLIENT="" > :allow > > Nevertheless, the smtp server still doesn't work. I just want the user with > the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] can send email through my Qmail server. What > other things I need to do or where can I seek for help? > Thank you very much if you can help me!!! You have a great misunderstanding on how tcpserver work and especially the rules. And relaying based on the envelope sender address is a really bad idea (tm). Consider using smtp after pop or s/t like that. To become familiar with tcpserver and solve your problem, read a) all qmail, daemontools and ucspi-tcp related stuff on http://cr.yp.to b) http://www.lifewithqmail.org/ c) check for additionals at http://www.qmail.org > cheers, > > CK ---------------------------------------- Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"; name="Anhang: 1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: ---------------------------------------- -- Henning Brauer | BS Web Services Hostmaster BSWS | Roedingsmarkt 14 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 20459 Hamburg www.bsws.de | Germany
Hi! Is there any way to run mails through a script after or before it enters qmail-inject? What i want, is to parse a Mail, and to remove unwanted characters from the mail. I already tried to replace qmail-inject with a script that afterwards calls qmail-inject, but that doesn't seem to work right, i sometimes get dublicated Mails !? The original problem i have, is that some remote smtp servers weren't happy with dos formatted mails (\n\r) it seems that those \n\r were removed, therefore the mail showed up in one single line. It strangely only happened with some smtp's qmail->qmail and qmail->exchange seem to have this problem, qmail->postfix seems to be ok. I'd be glad if anybody could comment on this problem ! -- Claus Beerta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Morning, I've a linux server whith Sendmail. I've a new server with qmail and Solaris 8 as operating system. How can I migrate all mailboxes and users accounts from the Sendmail server to the qmail server? Thank for rapid answer Jean-Claude
Hello I'm a newbie to qmail and I'm looking for information on its use. Have already check the FAQ's but didn't find an answer there. Is it possible for qmail, qmail-popup, qmail-pop3d to use Microsoft SQL Server to aunthenticate its users? Thanks! ************************* Jonor Lacuesta Systems Administrator Philippinemail.com "Send free postal letters to the Philippines FREE" http://www.philippinemail.com
