Tim Hunter writes:
> Does this mean that list.cr.yp.to is able to send/receive by QMTP, or is it
> planning on it?
I can't say. Dan might choose to use it, or he might not. If my
experience with him in the past is any judge, he'll take my code, and
fix this thing, and that thing, and by the time all is said and done,
none of it is the same. :) At least that's what happened with the
qmail-pop3d that I submitted to him. Not that I'm complaining -- his
design is much better than mine.
-russ
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russell Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 1:42 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: thoughts for future qmail
>
>
> Johan Almqvist writes:
> > On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 09:16:14AM -0500, Russell Nelson wrote:
> > > If I can get twenty people to implement it, AND insert an MX record
> > > for their qmtpd with one of the following priorities, then I'll commit
> > > to implementing a qmail-remote that also talks QMTP.
> >
> > Okay, and when can we have it?
>
> http://qmail.org/qmail-1.03-qmtpc.patch
>
> qmtp seems to be about twice as fast as smtp in terms of the amount of
> time a message spends sitting in the queue.
>
> --
> -russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com |
> Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | A bacon cheeseburger is
> 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | offensive to every major
> Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | religion.
>
