Andy Bradford said:
> Thus said Ricardo Cerqueira on Sun, 07 Jan 2001 01:50:16 GMT:
> > Personally, I'd rather have one file for SMTP, and another
> > for QMTP. Does anyone else here agree with me?
>
> This seems more logical to me as it allows finer control
> over the entire system.
It also seems to me that one of the design traits of qmail is
simplicity of config files - I can't find the reference, but I thought
somewhere DJB said that having to parse complex config files is a cause of
problems. Parseing two files, one for SMTP and one for QMTP, seems more in
line with that philosophy than having one file that must be parsed for
meaning rather than just correctness.
Just my .02.
--
gowen -- Greg Owen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SoftLock.com is now DigitalGoods!
