On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 03:26:21AM +0000, Ricardo Cerqueira wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 01:00:49AM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 02:40:39AM +0100, Johan Almqvist wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > There patch I released earlier wasn't quite as careful about memory
> > > allocation (or rather, failures of memory allocation) as the rest of Dan's
> > > code. I have released a new version, available from
> > >
> > > http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/
> > >
> > > I'm still very eager to hear your comments. I'll stick with the mailroutes
> > > design for now, though :->
> >
> > One comment: if smtproutes is compatible with mailroutes, why not use
> > smtproutes instead of mailroutes?
>
> Because the name is too confining... It implies smtp. mail is more generic
> :)
> But I still prefer having smtp and qmtp separately (keeping the good
> tradition of the multiple qmail conf files)
There can be only one! ;)
Seriously, if we need to change names, then use a single file. It's a
precedence nightmare managing multiple files...
--
Pedro Melo Cunha - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Novis - Dir. Rede - ISP - Infraes. Portal <http://www.novis.pt/>
Ed. Atrium Saldanha - Pça. Dq. Saldanha, 1 - 7º / 1050-094 Lisboa
tel: +351 21 0104340 - Fax: +351 21 0104301
