What about this ?
http://195.92.95.5/?restriction=site+contains&host=.hotmail.com&position=lim
ited
Did they successful switching to the W2K ?
Joomy.
> Ah, yes. Hotmail is owned by Mirco$oft. The last I heard microsoft tried
> porting Hotmail to Windows NT and it kept crashing and crashing... That
> was before Windows 2k.
>
> So it would make logical sense but is it technically feasible to do so..
>
> Regards
>
>
> George Patterson
>
> Boz Crowther wrote:
>
> > Isn't Hotmail owned by M$ (has been for a while, actually)? So, it
would
> > make sense that they run M$ OSes.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Stefan Laudat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 4:20 PM
> > Subject: Re: Hotmail Woes.
> >
> >
> >
> >> I see you have Linux 2.4.0-test11.
> >> Did you BY (BIG) MISTAKE compile TCP congestion notification in it?
> >> Hotmail is quite mad about this. Maybe their routers run M$ windows.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 05:36:53PM -0500, Corey Jarvis wrote:
> >>
> >>> To whomever,
> >>> I am having a wierd problem with hotmail.com smtp connections,
> >>> Anyone in the world can send to me however when I send to hotmail.com
it
> >>> won't accept any smtp connection.
> >>> I can send to yahoo or whomever accept to hotmail and certain other
> >>> domains. I know I am not black listed since this machine is brand
new.
> >>> Any ideas? And I have checked my reverse maps and they work properly.
> >>> Signed,
> >>> Corey
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Stefan Laudat
> >> -------------
> >> If rabbits feet are so lucky, what happened to the rabbit?
> >>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Powered by http://se-ed.net
>
