On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 15:32:13 +0100, Felix von Leitner wrote:
> That is not sufficient.
That was my point. Not having seen a security audit, nor looked at the
code myself, there is not solid claim to security.
> That said, I use the imapd myself.
We use it here as well on production systems.
> While I would not trust it as much as an imapd from djb, it seems to be
> the best alternative. Please note that IMAP is a large and complicated
> protocol. It is difficult to make it right because of the complexity.
My point exactly. Since there is no other alternative at this time
then it wins out by default. Compared to the rest of the imapd that
exist courier-imap works best with the our current needs.
Andy
