Sorry, I'm using multilog for logging.
And here is a Cut from Logs...
--
2001-02-01 16:07:00.591559500 status: local 0/250 remote 4/400
2001-02-01 16:07:01.136160500 new msg 709520
2001-02-01 16:07:01.176806500 info msg 709520: bytes 5581 from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 25704 uid 101
2001-02-01 16:07:02.265784500 end msg 697387
2001-02-01 16:07:02.356404500 delivery 67273: success:
205.188.156.129_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_OK/
2001-02-01 16:07:02.386210500 status: local 0/250 remote 3/400
2001-02-01 16:07:02.386383500 delivery 67274: success:
152.163.224.122_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_OK/
2001-02-01 16:07:02.427978500 status: local 0/250 remote 2/400
2001-02-01 16:07:02.544169500 new msg 710041
2001-02-01 16:07:02.556813500 info msg 710041: bytes 5267 from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 27810 uid 101
2001-02-01 16:07:03.080165500 starting delivery 67275: msg 698429 to remote
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2001-02-01 16:07:03.080480500 status: local 0/250 remote 3/400
2001-02-01 16:07:03.081277500 end msg 695824
2001-02-01 16:07:03.135796500 new msg 710562
2001-02-01 16:07:03.143146500 info msg 710562: bytes 4864 from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 706 uid 101
2001-02-01 16:07:03.224924500 end msg 699992
2001-02-01 16:07:03.302477500 new msg 711083
2001-02-01 16:07:03.326604500 info msg 711083: bytes 5300 from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 2831 uid 101
2001-02-01 16:07:03.505963500 starting delivery 67276: msg 699471 to remote
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2001-02-01 16:07:03.505979500 status: local 0/250 remote 4/400
2001-02-01 16:07:03.505987500 end msg 698950
2001-02-01 16:07:03.560075500 new msg 712125
2001-02-01 16:07:03.569882500 info msg 712125: bytes 5273 from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 7278 uid 101
2001-02-01 16:07:03.670697500 new msg 713167
2001-02-01 16:07:03.670707500 info msg 713167: bytes 4860 from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 11492 uid 101
2001-02-01 16:07:03.754286500 starting delivery 67277: msg 700513 to remote
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2001-02-01 16:07:03.754304500 status: local 0/250 remote 5/400
2001-02-01 16:07:03.786734500 new msg 713688
2001-02-01 16:07:03.794230500 info msg 713688: bytes 5282 from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 13649 uid 101
2001-02-01 16:07:03.883307500 new msg 720982
2001-02-01 16:07:03.895637500 info msg 720982: bytes 4861 from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 15475 uid 101
2001-02-01 16:07:04.133091500 starting delivery 67278: msg 702597 to remote
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2001-02-01 16:07:04.133110500 status: local 0/250 remote 6/400
2001-02-01 16:07:04.250982500 new msg 721503
2001-02-01 16:07:04.250989500 info msg 721503: bytes 4880 from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 17503 uid 101
2001-02-01 16:07:04.439898500 new msg 722024
2001-02-01 16:07:04.470841500 info msg 722024: bytes 4860 from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 19692 uid 101
2001-02-01 16:07:04.714957500 starting delivery 67279: msg 703639 to remote
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2001-02-01 16:07:04.714977500 status: local 0/250 remote 7/400
2001-02-01 16:07:04.714984500 delivery 67278: success:
194.45.170.86_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_Mail_accepted/
2001-02-01 16:07:04.774655500 status: local 0/250 remote 6/400
2001-02-01 16:07:04.897669500 new msg 722545
2001-02-01 16:07:04.909640500 info msg 722545: bytes 5275 from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 21935 uid 101
2001-02-01 16:07:05.232365500 end msg 702597
2001-02-01 16:07:05.311545500 delivery 67272: success:
205.188.156.229_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_OK/
2001-02-01 16:07:05.345557500 status: local 0/250 remote 5/400
2001-02-01 16:07:05.345569500 delivery 67275: success:
128.11.22.89_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_ok_dirdel/
2001-02-01 16:07:05.403328500 status: local 0/250 remote 4/400
2001-02-01 16:07:05.445345500 new msg 723066
2001-02-01 16:07:05.463266500 info msg 723066: bytes 4847 from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 24021 uid 101
2001-02-01 16:07:05.852987500 starting delivery 67280: msg 704681 to remote
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2001-02-01 16:07:05.853006500 status: local 0/250 remote 5/400
Thanks,
Michael..
Charles Cazabon wrote:
> Depends on your setup. Could be syslog is taking 80+% of your CPU if you're
> logging with that. It could be that you're testing over an internal network
> with microsecond latency and your deliveries all complete in a millisecond. It
> could be any of a hundred things. You haven't given us any information to
> diagnose your situation.
>
> Your qmail logs will contain information on this. Analyze those. If you
> have trouble doing that, post a relevant section of your logs showing
> concurrency not growing above 4.
>
> Charles
