On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 04:51:51PM -0800, Dan Peterson wrote: > Peter van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Two recipients, two responses. Looks like a bug in the document. > > There are three recipients across two messages. The first has one, the > second has two. Thank you. That explains the 2 qp values of which the second is doubled. djb illustrates the asynchronity (I woke up 2 minutes ago, ok? :) of the protocol that way. Greetz, Peter.
- Re: thoughts for future qmail Jurjen Oskam
- Re: thoughts for future qmail Dan Peterson
- Re: thoughts for future qmail Russell Nelson
- Re: thoughts for future qmail James Raftery
- QMTP protocol spec question David L. Nicol
- Re: QMTP protocol spec question Peter van Dijk
- Re: QMTP protocol spec question Dan Peterson
- Re: thoughts for future qmail Peter van Dijk
- Re: thoughts for future qmail Henning Brauer
- Re: thoughts for future qmail Russell Nelson
- Re: thoughts for future qmail Mark Delany
- Re: thoughts for future qmail Roger Merchberger
- Re: thoughts for future qmail David Benfell
- Re: thoughts for future qmail Russell Nelson
- Re: thoughts for future qmail David Benfell
- Re: thoughts for future qmail Timothy Legant
- Re: thoughts for future qmail Charles Cazabon
- Re: thoughts for future qmail Johan Almqvist
