[Snip. Typical cluless marketing BS about people moving form UNIX to
Windows 2000, since Windows 2000 is so obviously more secure, scalale,
and low-cost for running a SMTP server, than, say a Linux+Qmail or a
OpenBSD+Qmail setup]
> Jan. 25, 2000
This is out of date.
> http://www.sirana.com/smtp/results.asp
The whole domain sirana.com is dead right now. I guess marketing BS
about how Windows 2000 is going to replace perfectly secure and scalable
Qmail systems had no reality to it. Hence, it could not survive the
dot-com bloodbath.
> MailSite 4
I love their claims of scalibility with their mail server. "UNIX-like
scalability at a fraction of the cost". Hurrumph. How much does it cost
to put Linux and Qmail on an old Pentium or Pentium II?
They claim their mail server is secure, but the security is not up to par
with Qmail's security:
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/1244
- Sam
