qmail Digest 4 Feb 2001 11:00:01 -0000 Issue 1265
Topics (messages 56586 through 56607):
bind qmail-smtp to one IP-adress
56586 by: Clemens Hermann
56587 by: Greg Cope
Prepend message before forward to indicate original recipient
56588 by: Sean Brown
56591 by: Charles Cazabon
56597 by: Filip Sneppe \(Yucom\)
Re: Qmail won't deliver locally.
56589 by: Lincoln Yeoh
Re: Bogus Popularity claims (sendmail.org's reply)
56590 by: Peter Cavender
56594 by: Sam Trenholme
How do I keep a copy of all incoming and outgoing mail messages?
56592 by: Yee Siew Chin
56595 by: Charles Cazabon
56602 by: Yee Siew Chin
Re: qmail speed solaris
56593 by: Strange
NO REPLY TO - supervise/lock error !!
56596 by: Dennis
56600 by: Charles Cazabon
Re: secondary nameserver?
56598 by: Greg White
56599 by: Greg White
Re: Vanilla EZMLM??
56601 by: Dave Bigham
qmail.org down?
56603 by: Matthew Hunter
56604 by: Vern Hart
How to delelte the mail in the queue?
56605 by: lyndon
56606 by: J�rgen Persson
56607 by: Robin S. Socha
Administrivia:
To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To bug my human owner, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To post to the list, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi
I have a machine with several IP-adresses assigned to it. I installed qmail
with LWQ. Now I want qmail to "listen" just on one IP. At the moment I
can connect on any IP. What about pop3d? Here I would like to achive the
same thing. Thanks in advance.
/ch
Clemens Hermann wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I have a machine with several IP-adresses assigned to it. I installed qmail
> with LWQ. Now I want qmail to "listen" just on one IP. At the moment I
> can connect on any IP. What about pop3d? Here I would like to achive the
> same thing. Thanks in advance.
>
> /ch
This depends on how your are starting qmail-smtp and pop3 ?
If you've followed LWQ and setup tcpserver to start these then read the
tcpserver docs as its in there !
tcpserver [ opts ] host port prog
Port being an IP address (or 0 for all) to bind to.
Greg
I have qmail set up to recieve mail from a few different virtual domains. For most of them, I have all mail sent to those domains forwarded to one e-mail account (a hotmail account) using .qmail files. I would like to prepend the message so that when I read the body of the message using hotmail, I can tell which account it was originally sent to before it was forwarded. It would look smoething like this: Originally sent to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]And then the real body of the message... I assume this would be done in the .qmail file before the forward command, but how? Thanks.
|
Sean Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have qmail set up to recieve mail from a few different virtual domains.
> For most of them, I have all mail sent to those domains forwarded to one
> e-mail account (a hotmail account) using .qmail files. I would like to
> prepend the message so that when I read the body of the message using
> hotmail, I can tell which account it was originally sent to before it was
> forwarded. It would look smoething like this:
>
> Originally sent to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You don't need to. qmail records the recipient in a Delivered-To: header.
Just use Hotmail's "view message source" to see the headers.
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>I have qmail set up to recieve mail from a few different virtual domains.
For most of >them, I have all mail sent to those domains forwarded to one
e-mail account (a hotmail >account) using .qmail files. I would like to
prepend the message so that when I read the >body of the message using
hotmail, I can tell which account it was originally sent to >before it was
forwarded. It would look smoething like this:
>
>Originally sent to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>And then the real body of the message...
>
>I assume this would be done in the .qmail file before the forward command,
but how?
>
I am sure there's more than one way to do it. Here's a little perl script
that you can tailor to your needs. I am going to use it for a number of
users that will have their domain name changed next week, so the hotmail.com
part is still from my tests...
In the alias/.qmail* files of those users, I have:
[root@yuclnx2 alias]# cat .qmail-lsrrsl
|/usr/local/bin/friendly-bounce.pl
I am pretty sure what you (and I) are trying to achieve is also possible
with a program called 'vacation'. I just wasn't able to bounce the mail AND
forward it to the new reciepient at the same time from the .qmail* file.
-Filip
#!/usr/bin/perl
use Net::SMTP;
$mail_server = "212.8.180.36";
$domain_to_forward_to = "hotmail.com";
$message_bounce = "This email address has recently changed. Please
send all future mail to:\n";
$message_forward = " tried to mail you using your old email
address.\n\n\n";
$new_recipient = $ENV{'RECIPIENT'};
($new_recipient, $fake_dom) = split(/\@/, $new_recipient);
$new_recipient = $new_recipient . "\@" . $domain_to_forward_to;
while ($line = <STDIN>) { $mail_to_attach = $mail_to_attach . $line; }
# Bounce mail to original sender
#
$smtp_bounce = Net::SMTP->new($mail_server);
$smtp_bounce->mail("antwerpen.be-redirect\@yucom.be");
$smtp_bounce->to($ENV{'SENDER'});
$smtp_bounce->data();
$smtp_bounce->datasend("From: antwerpen.be mail bouncer\n");
$smtp_bounce->datasend("Subject: bounced email - please update your contacts
info\n\n");
$smtp_bounce->datasend($message_bounce . $new_recipient . "\n\n\n" .
$mail_to_attach);
$smtp_bounce->dataend();
$smtp_bounce->quit;
# Forward mail to real recipient's new email address
#
$smtp_forward = Net::SMTP->new($mail_server);
$smtp_forward->mail("antwerpen.be-redirect\@yucom.be");
$smtp_forward->to($new_recipient);
$smtp_forward->data();
$smtp_forward->datasend("From: antwerpen.be mail bouncer\n");
$smtp_forward->datasend("Subject: forwarded email - someone used an outdated
email address\n\n\n");
$smtp_forward->datasend($ENV{'SENDER'} . $message_forward .
$mail_to_attach);
$smtp_forward->dataend();
$smtp_forward->quit;
Try history.
Compare with actual install instructions.
Cheerio,
Link.
At 12:39 AM 2/3/01 -0800, Ryan Marsh wrote:
>Maybe I'm missing something then. Why did that directory listing show
>qmail as owning some?
>
>On 02 Feb 2001 21:39:07 -0500, Chris Johnson wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 03:03:42PM -0800, Ryan Marsh wrote:
>> > Why would qmail chgrp the files?
>>
>> It didn't.
>>
>> Chris
>
>
>
>--
>Regards,
>-ryan
>
>The three great virtues of programming are laziness, impatience,
>and hubris, but bigotry makes the open-source world go round.
>
>
>
I find it curious that they refer to sendmail as "shareware".
I though that shareware was software that one voluntarily paid for if they
used it after some "evaluation" period.
It seems a lot of people do not understand the definition of anything
other than closed-source, commercial software
--P
On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, Stephen Berg wrote:
> After I got this email on the list I sent an email to sendmail.org
> asking for some supporting material to their website's claim of
> sendmail powering "the vast majority" of email servers. They replied
> with the mail that I'm including below as their response.
>
> Seems to me that sendmail.org has decided to redefine the word
> "majority" as being 40% instead of more than half like Webster's
> unabridged dictionary. (Kind of reminds you of a big computer
> company redefining standards eh? But I won't mention microsoft with
> that thought.) By the survey they reference that sendmail runs on
> 41% of mail servers, but they still call that a majority.
>
> Then of course they include a bunch of company propaganda and
> advertising stuff.
>
> I've CC:'d this to the sendmail employee that replied so he knows
> that I've forwarded his reply to the qmail list and maybe he can
> explain to all of us the difference between 41% and "vast majority".
>
> On 13 Jan 2001 22:16:34 -0000, D. J. Bernstein wrote:
>
> >I've set up a web page to combat Sendmail Inc.'s false advertising on
> >this topic: http://cr.yp.to/surveys/sendmail.html
> >
> >Sendmail dropped below 50% of the Internet's SMTP servers---including
> >idle workstations---last year; qmail has climbed past 10%. I suspect
> >that qmail now handles more Internet mail deliveries than Sendmail does,
> >although I don't know a good way to measure this.
>
> Here's what I sent to sendmail.org:
> > Your website claims that sendmail powers the "vast majority" of
> > internet SMTP servers. I'm curious how you determined that and if
> > you have the results of such a survey available.
>
> And here's the reply I got from them:
>
> Sirana Survey Puts Sendmail Way Out in Front
> Checking the brand name of 513,797 Internet mail servers, company
> finds 41
> percent using sendmail, 15.7 percent using Ipswitch IMail, and 9.4
> percent
> using Microsoft Exchange Server as their external Internet mail
> server.
>
>
>
> Jan. 25, 2000
>
>
> Sirana Software has released what it calls the most extensive survey
> of
> Internet mail servers ever compiled. In the dot-com domain, 38
> percent of
> the mail servers support sendmail, while 20 percent support Ipswitch
> Imail
> Server. Microsoft Exchange Server had around an 11 percent share, and
> no
> other product was in the double digits.
>
> The shareware package sendmail, predominantly the current version
> 8.9.3,
> had more than half the mail servers found in the (net) domain, with
> Ipswitch second at 14 percent and Microsoft out of the money with 5
> percent. Sendmail had 42 percent of the (org) domain, 43 percent of
> the
> Canada (ca) domain, 45 percent of the Germany (de) domain, and 37
> percent
> of the Australia (au) domain. Microsoft and Ipswitch trailed by wide
> margins in each case.
>
> Over in the U.S. military's (mil) domain, the story was quite the
> opposite. Exchange had a 32 percent share, and sendmail had only 14
> percent. However, fully 23 percent came up in the Sirana survey as
> unknown. Novell, Lotus, Netscape, and Software.com were all at one
> percent
> or below.
>
> Entire Internet
>
> Across the entire Internet, sendmail had a 41 percent share. Ipswitch
> had
> 16 percent and Exchange had 9 percent. Nothing else was higher than 4
> percent. This survey of course counts mail servers as its unit -- not
> email users -- but it ranks the major players in a rather different
> order
> than one might expect.
>
>
> Vendor Hosts Percent
> Sendmail 210,902 41.0%
> Ipswitch 80,721 15.7%
> Microsoft 48,362 9.4%
> Qmail 19,802 3.9%
> Software.com 18,058 3.5%
> Gordano Ltd 17,228 3.4%
> Unknown 16,851 3.3%
> Lotus 6,924 1.3%
> Eudora 6,832 1.3%
> Novell 6,802 1.3%
> NetWin 6,263 1.2%
> Netscape 6,216 1.2%
> Checkpoint Software Technologies 5,399 1.1%
> Seattle Lab 4,973 1.0%
> Exim.org 4,957 1.0%
> Others 53,507 10%
> Total: 513,797 100%
>
> Source: Sirana Software
> http://www.sirana.com/smtp/results.asp
>
> Annual Year-End Survey
>
> It's once again time for Messaging Today to gather reports and
> statistics
> from the messaging industry, working towards the publication of a
> Dec. 31,
> 1999 installed base report by month's end. That process already has
> started. Recently, Messaging Today checked in with Rockliffe Inc., as
> it
> prepares to launch MailSite 4 next month. The company is making a
> major
> bet that ISPs and ASPs can be coaxed away from sendmail to a
> commercial
> platform, and from Unix to Windows 2000. It's not just MailSite
> that's
> used as bait, it's also all the other applications and tools that
> work
> with the Windows NT family that the company hopes will attract
> service
> providers.
>
> New Version Next Month
>
> MailSite(3) is in use at some 2,000 customer sites, with a total of
> around
> 2.5 million users, according to company president John Davies. He
> said the
> launch of this newest version is scheduled for mid-February, to
> coincide
> with the Feb. 17 launch of Windows 2000 and the Feb. 15-17 ISPCON
> Europe
> 2000 show in London. He said the major enhancements over version 3,
> released last march, are in the areas of Webmail and scalability.
>
> "We've been able to achieve better scalability through integration
> with
> SQL server databases," Davies said, "and also by adding in some code
> to
> support clustering. We designed it so you can start with two nodes,
> and
> you should be able to take it up to four, eight, or ten machines. You
> can
> host a single domain over multiple MailSite machines."
>
> The user directory can be run on one machine, using a centralized SQL
> Server 7 database. The message store can run on another machine,
> optimized
> for high volumes of file reads and writes. Then multiple machines can
> be
> run as MailSite application nodes. This architecture, Davies said,
> has
> already scaled up to half a million users, and can probably go to a
> million users. The architecture gets around some of the high-volume
> filing
> problems of the Windows NT filing system by using a Network Appliance
> Inc.
> file server for the message store function. In that way, he said he
> can
> get the reliability and scalability of Unix at NT prices.
>
> Looking for Non-Unix ISPs
>
> "We're targeting high-end service providers. We're competing with
> Unix
> solutions, and with other NT solutions. And we think we have some
> advantages on both," Davies said. Large and established ISPs still
> prefer
> Unix, but if they're starting small and want to scale along with
> traffic,
> or if they want Webmail along with POP3 client access, Davies said
> they
> might find MailSite attractive. If they plan on getting to a million
> users
> in no time, they'll probably use a Unix solution. But only a handful
> are
> that ambitious about their own growth, and only a few dozen have ever
> gotten that big.
>
> Application Service Providers (ASPs), however, seem more receptive to
> Windows NT, he said, because they usually set up their clients one
> per
> machine, and NT has a lower cost for that type of configuration.
> Also, he
> said the ASPs find it easier to pick from the array of applications
> available for NT, and then to integrate them into the server for a
> customer.
>
> What Davies said he hopes also will attract ASPs and ISPs is the
> simplicity of the new MailSite Express Webmail interface, which is
> both
> easy to customize and feature-rich, given its avoidance of Java,
> JavaScript, and ActiveX controls. The Webmail interface looks and
> feels
> like Hotmail, but it also supports folders, address books,
> forwarding,
> changing passwords, and updating your own directory entry. It uses
> the
> IMAP protocol to talk to MailSite, so all messages remain stored on
> the
> server. That way, a user can switch from Webmail to an Outlook client
> without missing any messages. If they read them on a borrowed Webmail
> connection and don't delete them, they can read them again using
> Outlook,
> saving a copy locally.
>
> Webmail-to-Outlook Contact Synch
>
> The MailSite Express online address book can import and export
> contacts
> from an Outlook client, so users can travel with their name and
> number
> lists stored in their Webmail interface, reachable through any Web
> browser. Davies said Rockliffe wrote an Outlook service provider that
> adds
> a new button to the Outlook toolbar. When the button is pressed, the
> utility displays lists of the MailSite Express and Outlook contacts.
> Users
> can synchronize them in either direction. Customizing the interface
> to
> suit an ISP's look and feel is a process of editing three files,
> Davies
> said. Pricing will be around $1 per user.
>
>
>
>
> 2000 Messaging Online, Inc.
>
> Stephen Berg
> //- USAF Instructor -/- Reluctant NT User -/- Web Designer -//
> //- Home = [EMAIL PROTECTED] -//
> //- Work = [EMAIL PROTECTED] -//
> //- http://iceberg.3c0x1.com/ -/- http://www.3c0x1.com -//
>
>
[Snip. Typical cluless marketing BS about people moving form UNIX to
Windows 2000, since Windows 2000 is so obviously more secure, scalale,
and low-cost for running a SMTP server, than, say a Linux+Qmail or a
OpenBSD+Qmail setup]
> Jan. 25, 2000
This is out of date.
> http://www.sirana.com/smtp/results.asp
The whole domain sirana.com is dead right now. I guess marketing BS
about how Windows 2000 is going to replace perfectly secure and scalable
Qmail systems had no reality to it. Hence, it could not survive the
dot-com bloodbath.
> MailSite 4
I love their claims of scalibility with their mail server. "UNIX-like
scalability at a fraction of the cost". Hurrumph. How much does it cost
to put Linux and Qmail on an old Pentium or Pentium II?
They claim their mail server is secure, but the security is not up to par
with Qmail's security:
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/1244
- Sam
8.2. How do I keep a copy of all incoming and outgoing
mail messages?
Answer: Set QUEUE_EXTRA to "Tlog\0" and QUEUE_EXTRALEN
to 5 in extra.h.
Recompile qmail. Put ./msg-log into ~alias/.qmail-log.
The above is from the FAQ, I want to know what does
set QUEUE_EXTRA to "Tlog\0" and QUEUE_EXTRALEN to 5
does?
And, can the copy of all incoming and outgoing mail
messages mail/forward to a user's email account such
as [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
rgds,
yee
__________________________________________________
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
Yee Siew Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The above is from the FAQ, I want to know what does
> set QUEUE_EXTRA to "Tlog\0" and QUEUE_EXTRALEN to 5
> does?
QUEUE_EXTRA is a compiled-in value which tells qmail that whenever it queues
a message, a copy is queued for the value of this variable. QUEUE_EXTRALEN
is the length of this variable, with the trailing NUL.
> And, can the copy of all incoming and outgoing mail
> messages mail/forward to a user's email account such
> as [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
You could, by putting "&[EMAIL PROTECTED]" into ~alias/.qmail-log, but
if anything bounces you could have problems on your hands, as the bounces will
also be queued to go there (I think).
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
can i put this "/var/spool/mail/logadmin" in
~alias/.qmail-log if i use qmail with /var/spool/mail
instead of Maildir or Mailbox?
rgds,
yee
--- Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Yee Siew Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The above is from the FAQ, I want to know what
> does
> > set QUEUE_EXTRA to "Tlog\0" and QUEUE_EXTRALEN to
> 5
> > does?
>
> QUEUE_EXTRA is a compiled-in value which tells qmail
> that whenever it queues
> a message, a copy is queued for the value of this
> variable. QUEUE_EXTRALEN
> is the length of this variable, with the trailing
> NUL.
>
> > And, can the copy of all incoming and outgoing
> mail
> > messages mail/forward to a user's email account
> such
> > as [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
>
> You could, by putting "&[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> into ~alias/.qmail-log, but
> if anything bounces you could have problems on your
> hands, as the bounces will
> also be queued to go there (I think).
>
> Charles
> --
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Charles Cazabon
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> GPL'ed software available at:
> http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
> Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
__________________________________________________
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Michael Maier wrote:
> Dave Sill wrote:
> > You asked this yesterday. Do you think the answer is different today?
> Yes, may depend on You!
Michael, as root, please run the below and post the results:
ulimit -n
If descriptors is 64, there's probably your problem, You'll want to set
ulimit -n unlimited
in your /etc/rc?.d/Swhatever that starts qmail up (it'll be a /bin/sh
script, which is why that syntax), and/or your /var/qmail/rc or put
limit -h descrip unlimited
limit descrip unlimited
if either is a csh script.
Then stop/start qmail using the scripts.
-M
Michael Brian Scher (MS683/MS3213) Anthropologist, Attorney, Policy Analyst
Mainlining Internet Connectivity for Fun and Profit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Give me a compiler and a box to run it, and I can move the mail.
Hi all..
Me again.
Just wondering if anyone had any suggestions for my below problem?
Haven't heard anything from anyone yet :(
Cheers
Dennis
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dennis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, 31 January 2001 10:47 PM
> To: Qmail@List. Cr. Yp. To
> Subject: supervise/lock error !!
>
>
> Help !!
> Anyone know why I might be getting this error ?
>
> supervise: fatal: unable to acquire qmail-smtpd/supervise/lock: temporary
> failure
> supervise: fatal: unable to acquire log/supervise/lock: temporary failure
>
> ?
>
> Dennis
>
Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just wondering if anyone had any suggestions for my below problem?
> Haven't heard anything from anyone yet :(
Don't send the same question to the list twice. If you're not patient, you
can go to www.qmail.org and look under "paid support".
And besides, I did respond to your question the first time. You have been
reading the list since you posted, haven't you?
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 08:38:14PM +0000, Mark Delany wrote:
> > And to answer the second question, about the secondary being updated
> > automatically when a new zone is added - uh.. excuse me?
>
> You're excused.
>
> > Are you saying this is possible with BIND?
>
> Yes, it's called NOTIFY.
>
Doesn't NOTIFY only work when the server is _already_ configured as a
secondary for the zone in question? If I've got zone foo.org in two BIND
servers, primary on a.foo.org and secondary on b.foo.org, and then I add
zone bar.org to server a.foo.org, I must then reconfigure server
b.foo.org as a secondary _before_ it will initiate a zone transfer of
bar.org? Please correct me if I'm wrong here...
> > The primary server "pushing" a zone on the secondaries - "here,
> > have this, my admin tells me you want to mirror it"?
>
> No. It notifies the secondary that there is a change, it's up to the
> secondary to initiate the transfer.
>
> > If this were true (and I sure think it isn't), it'd be just one more
> > reason to stay away from BIND..
>
> Right conclusion, wrong rationale.
If BIND exhibits this behaviour (of my above comments, and it's my
impression that this was the question being asked), then I'd agree -- it
would be a _very_ good reason to stay the hell away from BIND.... Not
that I need another. ;)
>
>
> Regards.
--
Greg White
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent
revolution inevitable.
-- John F. Kennedy
Sorry, qmail list. Wrong list....
GW
Sorry if this gets posted twice. I'm still trying to get used to many
different ways of responding to various lists.
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Bigham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Russell Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2001 6:03 PM
Subject: Vanilla EZMLM??
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Russell Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 1:28 AM
> Subject: Re: Bogus popularity claims for Sendmail
>
>
> > D. J. Bernstein writes:
> >
> > I don't think anybody is running vanilla ezmlm if they have more than
> > one list. Ezmlm doesn't account for bounces across lists. Instead,
> > if a user is subscribed to N lists, ezmlm has to run through its
> > bounce algorithm N times.
>
>
> Could you be a little more specific here. "vanilla ezmlm" as opposed to
> what? Are you saying that EZMLM does not handle bounces well with more
than
> one list or is there a different EZMLM (EZMLM-IDX??) that does better with
> multiple lists on the same server?
>
> Thanks,
> Dave Bigham
>
www.qmail.org is refusing my connections to port 80.
I *was* planning to set up a qmail server this weekend
with some of the patches on that site. Since it seems to be
down, does anyone know why? And, ideally, know where a working
mirror is?
--
Matthew Hunter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Linux-2.4.1 on an i686
GPG Public Key: http://www.infodancer.org/users/matthew/public.txt
Windows(TM). The ultimate Windows emulator for the Windows
<platform! Only $900!
PGP signature
Today, Matthew Hunter wrote:
>
> www.qmail.org is refusing my connections to port 80.
> I *was* planning to set up a qmail server this weekend
> with some of the patches on that site. Since it seems to be
> down, does anyone know why? And, ideally, know where a working
> mirror is?
Off the top of my head I can remember one mirror:
http://qmail.area.com
Cheers,
Vern
all,
I have a problem. I find there are some mail in the queue.
I want to delete them, How to do it?
Thanks.
==================================
lyndon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Feb 04, 1999 at 04:33:52PM +0800, lyndon wrote:
> all,
>
> I have a problem. I find there are some mail in the queue.
> I want to delete them, How to do it?
There are utilities for this but I prefer to change the time for the
relevant file under /var/qmail/queue/info/ with
$ touch -d '1 week ago'
Jörgen
--
btw -- speaking of time, welcome to the new millennium :)
* lyndon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I find there are some mail in the queue. I want to delete them, How
> to do it?
http://www.io.com/~mick/soft/qmhandle.html
