Jasper McIntosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can I also confirm that Ezmlm doesn't do anything too weird with the qmail > queue, and that I should still compile qmail with a really high conf-split of > around 2500 (I read that the Linux FS's like it up there, but I guess that > subject is more suited to another list:) A conf-split that high is pretty much pointless (and it should be prime, regardless). As a side note, I've read much to the contrary -- that because of the efficiency with which Linux caches directory entries, qmail performs best with a conf-split of 2 for an extremely busy server, and 1 (!) for a smaller server or busy workstation. Note this is anecdotal, but it seems reasonable. Some day when I have sufficient time, I'll do some real measurements. Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ My opinions are just that -- my opinions. -----------------------------------------------------------------------
