qmail Digest 24 Feb 2001 11:00:01 -0000 Issue 1285
Topics (messages 57825 through 57887):
Re: djbcron
57825 by: James R Grinter
Re: LWQ & OpenBSD
57826 by: James R Grinter
57832 by: Henning Brauer
57835 by: Dave Sill
57849 by: Henning Brauer
Re: qmail-smtpd logging
57827 by: James R Grinter
Re: CNAME problem with qmail and djbdns
57828 by: Dave Sill
Return address for autoresponder
57829 by: Leander Berwers
Re: warning: trouble opening remote/4/r
57830 by: Charles Cazabon
Re: Mysterious error message
57831 by: Charles Cazabon
Cannot receive mail from several servers
57833 by: Saso Dundev
qmail-conf-054 / multilog
57834 by: Paul Farber
57836 by: Chris Johnson
57838 by: Dave Sill
57850 by: Paul Farber
57851 by: Chris Johnson
57852 by: Mark Delany
57861 by: Paul Farber
57862 by: Paul Farber
57863 by: Mark Delany
57870 by: Paul Farber
57872 by: Mark Delany
Newbies Question [slightly offtopic]
57837 by: John Peterson
57846 by: Charles Cazabon
Cannot receive mail from some sites
57839 by: Saso Dundev
57847 by: Charles Cazabon
Re: qmail-scanner wrapper
57840 by: Davi
How not to queue local deliveries
57841 by: Manvendra Bhangui
57845 by: Peter van Dijk
Re: how can i change from inetd to xinetd in Redhat 7.0??
57842 by: Pawel Garbowski
binm2
57843 by: Kashan Sadiq
microsoft RTFM?
57844 by: Kurth Bemis
Re: qmail-qfilter ~ Help...
57848 by: Jesse Sunday
limit size of outbound mail?
57853 by: Bill Parker
57855 by: Charles Cazabon
57856 by: Peter van Dijk
Re: Mail hub for relay and outgoing only - no local
57854 by: Dion_Vansevenant.psdi.com
OK, another question...
57857 by: Jesse Sunday
cyclog line?
57858 by: Bill Parker
57859 by: Charles Cazabon
57860 by: Mark Delany
Re: AMaVis Help.
57864 by: schoon.amgt.com
Inter7 introduces new software: vQregister
57865 by: vol.inter7.com
57866 by: Dan Phoenix
57867 by: vol.inter7.com
57868 by: Mark Delany
57869 by: Dan Phoenix
57871 by: vol.inter7.com
57873 by: vol.inter7.com
57874 by: Rod... Whitworth
57875 by: John Gonzalez/netMDC admin
DNS Patch Unavailable
57876 by: John Evans
57878 by: Adam McKenna
57879 by: Jeremy Suo-Anttila
Missing To:/From: Fields in Virtual Domain Setup.
57877 by: schoon.amgt.com
57880 by: Andy Bradford
Alternate directory for .qmail files
57881 by: Ben Schumacher
57882 by: Alex Pennace
57883 by: Ben Schumacher
Mail Doesn't go in /var/spool/mail
57884 by: Kashan Sadiq
forwarding when somebody already has an account
57885 by: Chris Cera
57886 by: Chris Hellberg
57887 by: Chris Cera
Administrivia:
To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To bug my human owner, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To post to the list, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Chris Garrigues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A few years ago i had a gig teaching use of Tivoli Maestro, which is best
> described to Unixheads as "cron on steroids". It's a port of a mainframe
Yes! Many of us will have encountered this functionality in similar
tools such as Autosys and Control-M - and it is functionality that
would be worth having.
> The neatest feature it has, however, is a very sophisticated dependency
> relationship, so you can say things like:
>
> Run job A on work days
> Run job B on holidays and weekends
> Run job C after either job A or job B has completed. (but don't run job C if
> A or B did not run).
plus:
- including the ability to restart at any job once a problem has been fixed.
- conditional execution depending upon the result of a previous job.
- maximum number of simulataneous jobs on a system, or across systems.
(and the ability to have user interfaces sat atop, to indicate how far
a batch-run has got.)
James.
"Robin S. Socha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> man hier should be a lot older than OpenBSD or whatever. I mean, really.
Unix-88 said that this sort of non-vendor provided stuff should go in
/opt/{vendor}/, but SunOS 4.1.x chose not to do that and few others do
even now. (SunOS 4's HIER(7) suggested /usr/local/ was for "locally
maintained software", and /var/ was "directory of files that tend to
grow or vary in size". The BSD4.4-derived OS's go further and suggest
that /var/ should be solely transient stuff)
Nowadays, I'm tending to build things self contained in
/opt/{product}/ and symlink appropriate things into /usr/local/*/.
For qmail on Solaris, I've been going for:
/opt/qmail/
alias/
bin/
boot/
control/
doc/
log -> var/log/qmail
man/
queue -> var/queue
sbin/
supervise/
users/
var -> /var/qmail
/var/qmail/queue/
/var/log/qmail/
/usr/local/man/*/* -> /opt/qmail/man/*/* (to aid use of man)
(as I consider my qmail configurations and binaries non-transient!)
supervise/ is a tricky one though - some bits in there are
configuration and some bits are transient status info. How would
supervise cope if the .../{process}/supervise/ subdirectories were
symlinks into /var/run/supervise/ ?
(control/ should arguably be in /etc/opt/qmail/..., as should alias/.)
Dan's right that it's a mess, for sure.
James.
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:34:36PM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
> Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 10:00:46AM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
> >>
> >> Nonsense. The "qmail" script from LWQ is compatible with the System V
> >> init script mechanism, but it's also perfectly compatible with BSD and
> >> generally useful on all UNIX flavors as a qmail control
> >> interface. Maybe I should rename it qmailctl a la apachectl or
> >> ctlqmail a la ctlinnd...
> >
> >No. I'd go with Robin to say that init scripts shouldn't live in
> >/usr/local/whatever,
>
> Where should they live?
Nowhere. We have exactly two (2) init scripts, /etc/rc and /etc/rc.local
> Where does apachectl live?
/usr/sbin/apachectl, but thats irrelevant as apache is NOT started or
stopped or whatever by apachectl, apachectl in OpenBSD is just a helper
program for the sysadmin, not for the system.
> >and your qmail script, perfect for linux and other
> >sysv-init systems, is not adequate for *BSD.
> Does "qmail start" not work on *BSD? Of course it does. It may be more
> than you want, but that doesn't make it inadequate.
maybe inadequate wasn't the right word, bit it doesn't fit in BSd philosophy.
> >It's totally against the "keep it simple"-approach.
>
> How is having a simple control interface like:
[...]
> against "keep it simple"?
> What are the *BSD-approved equivalents for the above commands?
svc -d /service/qmail-* and co. In general you are looking up PIDs and send
them signals in BSD-world, not calling complex scripts. svscan/supervise
fits good in BSD world as these are simple approaches working very very fine.
> >> Granted, I should add a note about adding:
> >> if [ -x /usr/local/sbin/qmail ]; then
> >> /usr/local/sbin/qmail start
> >> fi
> >> to rc.local for BSD variants,
> >
> >No, see above.
>
> I just don't get it.
>
> >... I believe that you don't have a linux
> >bias, and in fact i'd guess most qmail-installations _are_ on linux. I'd
> >just separate basic instructions from os specifica as we have done it in
> >http://www.lifewithdjbdns.org/ and http://www.lifewithqmail.org/ldap/.
>
> My goal with LWQ--and it was obviously less than 100% successful--was
> to keep the installation instructions as portable as possible. I
> wanted to avoid having constant interruptions for OS-specific
> details.
It can't work. The OS concepts are to different.
> -Dave
>
--
Henning Brauer | BS Web Services
Hostmaster BSWS | Roedingsmarkt 14
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 20459 Hamburg
http://www.bsws.de | Germany
I really should let this die, but I just can't...
Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:34:36PM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
>
>> Where does apachectl live?
>
>/usr/sbin/apachectl, but thats irrelevant as apache is NOT started or
>stopped or whatever by apachectl, apachectl in OpenBSD is just a helper
>program for the sysadmin, not for the system.
How do you start Apache if not "apachectl start"?
>> How is having a simple control interface like:
>[...]
>> against "keep it simple"?
>> What are the *BSD-approved equivalents for the above commands?
>
>svc -d /service/qmail-* and co. In general you are looking up PIDs and send
>them signals in BSD-world, not calling complex scripts.
"Complex scripts"? You think think the LWQ qmail script is complex?
Give me a break! It's freakin' trivial.
Let's look at simplicity and complexity... Let's compare your way and
my way for some simple qmail administration tasks:
Task BSD LWQ
start PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/bin qmail start
svscan /service &
stop svc -d /service/qmail-* qmail stop
svc -d /service/qmail-*/log
restart svc -d /service/qmail-* qmail restart
svc -d /service/qmail-*/log
PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/bin
svscan /service &
rebuild cdb tcprules /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb \ qmail cdb
/etc/tcp.smtp.tmp < /etc/tcp.smtp
check queue qmail-qstat qmail queue
qmail-qread
hup fire up web browser qmail hup
go to http://cr.yp.to
find daemontools docs
look up svc
locate HUP option
svc -h /service/qmail-send
The last example is facetious, of course, but illustrative of the fact
that not everyone wants to memorize all of svc's options. And when you
need to act fast, do you really want to have to research what to do
first? What if cr.yp.to's down? What if your net link is down? Do you
really have a local copy of the daemontools docs? Is it current?
>[Non-OS specific installation instructions] can't work. The OS
>concepts are to different.
That's pretty sad, but it's a symptom of the gratuitous
incompatibilities that DJB rails against. And these are due to 20
different OS packagers each doing things their own way and demanding
that developers accomodate their whims.
The LWQ qmail script works the same on all platforms. Can't BSD be
just a little flexible and allow cross-platform compatibility?
-Dave
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 10:33:09AM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
> I really should let this die, but I just can't...
>
> Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:34:36PM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
> >
> >> Where does apachectl live?
> >
> >/usr/sbin/apachectl, but thats irrelevant as apache is NOT started or
> >stopped or whatever by apachectl, apachectl in OpenBSD is just a helper
> >program for the sysadmin, not for the system.
>
> How do you start Apache if not "apachectl start"?
/usr/sbin/httpd
> >> How is having a simple control interface like:
> >[...]
> >> against "keep it simple"?
> >> What are the *BSD-approved equivalents for the above commands?
> >
> >svc -d /service/qmail-* and co. In general you are looking up PIDs and send
> >them signals in BSD-world, not calling complex scripts.
>
> "Complex scripts"? You think think the LWQ qmail script is complex?
> Give me a break! It's freakin' trivial.
The script itself is everything but trivial.
One Example why it is bad: you are storing svscans PID (via $!) in
/var/run/svscan.pid und use this PID for killing svscan later. What if the
admin has killed and started svscan in other ways before "qmail stop"? Given
your favorite server prog has this PID when you issue "qmail stop"? You are
killing the wrong program. Starting svscan at boottime and never stop it is
the much cleaner way and fits well in BSD philosophy. And, btw, works as
well on Linux.
> Let's look at simplicity and complexity... Let's compare your way and
> my way for some simple qmail administration tasks:
>
> Task BSD LWQ
>
> start PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/bin qmail start
> svscan /service &
covered by /etc/rc.local, never done by hand.
> stop svc -d /service/qmail-* qmail stop
> svc -d /service/qmail-*/log
>
> restart svc -d /service/qmail-* qmail restart
> svc -d /service/qmail-*/log
> PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/bin
> svscan /service &
no.
svc -t /service/qmail-*
multilog needs no restart usually.
your example is worng, you'd have two svscans running if you do so.
> rebuild cdb tcprules /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb \ qmail cdb
> /etc/tcp.smtp.tmp < /etc/tcp.smtp
right.
> check queue qmail-qstat qmail queue
> qmail-qread
>
> hup fire up web browser qmail hup
> go to http://cr.yp.to
> find daemontools docs
> look up svc
> locate HUP option
> svc -h /service/qmail-send
no. I'm familiar with svc as everbody running anything under svscan should
be, so it is simply
svc -h /service/qmail-send
And you forgot "reschedule queue",
svc -a /service/qmail-send qmail alrm (?)
[..]
> Do you
> really have a local copy of the daemontools docs? Is it current?
of course. But i wish Dan would include manpages...
> >[Non-OS specific installation instructions] can't work. The OS
> >concepts are to different.
>
> That's pretty sad, but it's a symptom of the gratuitous
> incompatibilities that DJB rails against. And these are due to 20
> different OS packagers each doing things their own way and demanding
> that developers accomodate their whims.
Yes, thats true.
> The LWQ qmail script works the same on all platforms. Can't BSD be
> just a little flexible and allow cross-platform compatibility?
svscan is the way to cross-platform compatibility.
> -Dave
>
--
Henning Brauer | BS Web Services
Hostmaster BSWS | Roedingsmarkt 14
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 20459 Hamburg
http://www.bsws.de | Germany
"Chris Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> have it logged for remote-to-local x-fers, for say finding out the address
> of an open spam relay that keeps sending me junk, that is my end-goal.
qmail's approach is that you look in the message that you have. As
someone else has pointed out - it's in the Received: headers...
> Perhaps I'm going about this the wrong way, but in the past with sendmail I
> have always been able to get this information from my logs.
...which is great, except when you don't have the message because
you're trying to analyse it passing through your system.
Markus Stumpf has been working on some improved qmail-smtpd logging.
James.
Marcus Korte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have setup a qmail server with the patched dns.c file (PACKETSZ increased
>to 65536).
You shouldn't do that if you're using dnscache.
>Also a local dnscache based on djbdns-1.05 is setup according to the FAQs.
>Normal lookups are working fine, but qmail together with dnscache running
>connecting to the localhost as server (127.0.0.1 in resolv.conf) I got the
>following messages in the qmail/current log for any mail message.
>
>2001-02-22 17:19:07.687368500 status: local 0/10 remote 2/20
>2001-02-22 17:19:07.690907500 delivery 3: deferral:
>CNAME_lookup_failed_temporarily._(#4.4.3)/
For what domain? Were you able to look up that domain via dnscache on
the same system at the same time?
-Dave
Hello
I am writing an auto-responder in Perl. I have been looking for the ones
publicly available, but I was wondering to what address I have to
respond to, namely:
Do you need to look for Reply-To: first and if that header is
unavailable look for From:? Or has qmail a mechanism for itself to
determine it (I think their is nothing useful in $ENV[].
Regards
Leander
flint <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Your problem could be ident and DNS lookup timeouts from tcpserver.
> >Investigate the possibility of turning off ident lookups, and either
> >disabling DNS lookups or fixing your DNS resolver/content server.
>
> Yes! It's really our DNS problem.
[...]
> But I have not fix the queue yet, because I don't know how to Shut down the
> qmail-send. I have seen many documents,some use "svc" command, there isn't
> "svc" command in our server, also I cann't find qmail-send.pid file in
> /var/run like some articles said. How could I do?
I take it that you are not the one that installed qmail on this system.
There's a thousand ways to start/stop qmail.
You don't have a svc command, so it's probably not running under svscan.
If it's installed with a SysV-like startup script, try
/etc/rc.d/init.d/qmail stop
or
/etc/init.d/qmail stop
or possibly (some Lwq installs):
/usr/local/bin/qmail stop
If none of those work, see if you have /var/qmail/bin/rc -- that tells you
how qmail starts, and perhaps then you'll know how to stop it.
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tim Hassan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 550 5.7.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Relaying denied. IP name lookup failed
> [some.ip.add.ress]
Doesn't look like a qmail error message to me either.
> Now, I telnet to the qmail box (from the server that runs his code that
> connects to the qmail box to send emails) on port 25 and helo my.host.com,
> mail from:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> rcpt to:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> data, body, and
> "." and qmail queues the message with no errors, I get the email at the
> other end. Hrmmmmmm
But were you trying to send the message to the same address(es) his
web stuff is using?
Is it possible that this bounce is actually coming froma machine one hop
past your qmail box?
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi,
I have qmail on RedHat5.1.
I can receive mail from almost every server in Internet (
for example www.yahoo.com),
but there are some servers I cant receive from. They make
connection which timeouts. Here is the logged session:
LOG start-----
Feb 22 23:49:53 gw smtpd: 982878593.400905 tcpserver: pid
2826 from 194.221.211.145
Feb 22 23:50:19 gw smtpd: 982878619.435991 tcpserver: ok
2826 eurorisksystems.com:193.200.17.182:25
vwmail4.hypovereinsbank.de:194.221.211.145::59228
Feb 22 23:50:19 gw smtpd: 982878619.454757 2826 220
ms.eurorisksystems.com ESMTP?
Feb 22 23:50:22 gw smtpd: 982878622.354098 2826 EHLO
vwmail.HypoVereinsbank.DE?
Feb 22 23:50:22 gw smtpd: 982878622.358529 2826 250-
ms.eurorisksystems.com?
Feb 22 23:50:22 gw smtpd: 982878622.361590 2826 250-
PIPELINING?
Feb 22 23:50:22 gw smtpd: 982878622.364295 2826 250
8BITMIME?
Feb 22 23:50:23 gw smtpd: 982878623.783361 2826 MAIL
From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?
Feb 22 23:50:23 gw smtpd: 982878623.787308 2826 250 ok?
Feb 22 23:50:25 gw smtpd: 982878625.563224 2826 RCPT
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?
Feb 22 23:50:25 gw smtpd: 982878625.568568 2826 250 ok?
Feb 22 23:50:27 gw smtpd: 982878627.139794 2826 DATA?
Feb 22 23:50:27 gw smtpd: 982878627.153254 2826 354 go
ahead?
Feb 22 23:54:10 gw smtpd: 982878850.895510 2818 451
timeout (#4.4.2)?
Feb 22 23:54:10 gw smtpd: 982878850.898664 2818 [EOF]
Feb 22 23:54:10 gw smtpd: 982878850.909532 tcpserver: end
2818 status 256
Feb 22 23:54:10 gw smtpd: 982878850.914715 tcpserver:
status: 2/40
Feb 22 23:57:12 gw smtpd: 982879032.075360 tcpserver:
status: 3/40
Feb 22 23:57:12 gw smtpd: 982879032.080109 tcpserver: pid
2831 from 193.158.192.31
Feb 22 23:57:14 gw smtpd: 982879034.501498 tcpserver: ok
2831 eurorisksystems.com:193.200.17.182:25 vwmail-
b.hypovereinsbank.de:193.158.192.31::55482
Feb 22 23:57:14 gw smtpd: 982879034.519838 2831 220
ms.eurorisksystems.com ESMTP?
Feb 22 23:57:15 gw smtpd: 982879035.885164 2831 EHLO
vwmail-b.HypoVereinsbank.de?
Feb 22 23:57:15 gw smtpd: 982879035.888215 2831 250-
ms.eurorisksystems.com?
Feb 22 23:57:15 gw smtpd: 982879035.890929 2831 250-
PIPELINING?
Feb 22 23:57:15 gw smtpd: 982879035.893633 2831 250
8BITMIME?
Feb 22 23:57:27 gw smtpd: 982879047.679537 2831 MAIL
From:?
Feb 22 23:57:27 gw smtpd: 982879047.683208 2831 250 ok?
Feb 22 23:57:28 gw smtpd: 982879048.914208 2831 RCPT
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?
Feb 22 23:57:28 gw smtpd: 982879048.917883 2831 250 ok?
Feb 22 23:57:30 gw smtpd: 982879050.464026 2831 DATA?
Feb 22 23:57:30 gw smtpd: 982879050.475434 2831 354 go
ahead?
Feb 23 00:01:02 gw smtpd: 982879262.959661 tcpserver:
status: 4/40
Feb 23 00:01:02 gw smtpd: 982879262.964829 tcpserver: pid
2845 from 194.221.211.145
Feb 23 00:01:28 gw smtpd: 982879288.995972 tcpserver: ok
2845 eurorisksystems.com:193.200.17.182:25
vwmail4.hypovereinsbank.de:194.221.211.145::59740
Feb 23 00:01:29 gw smtpd: 982879289.015136 2845 220
ms.eurorisksystems.com ESMTP?
Feb 23 00:01:30 gw smtpd: 982879290.037731 2845 EHLO
vwmail.HypoVereinsbank.DE?
Feb 23 00:01:30 gw smtpd: 982879290.040721 2845 250-
ms.eurorisksystems.com?
Feb 23 00:01:30 gw smtpd: 982879290.043457 2845 250-
PIPELINING?
Feb 23 00:01:30 gw smtpd: 982879290.046194 2845 250
8BITMIME?
Feb 23 00:01:31 gw smtpd: 982879291.457610 2845 MAIL
From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?
Feb 23 00:01:31 gw smtpd: 982879291.461524 2845 250 ok?
Feb 23 00:01:33 gw smtpd: 982879293.127466 2845 RCPT
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?
Feb 23 00:01:33 gw smtpd: 982879293.131349 2845 250 ok?
Feb 23 00:01:34 gw smtpd: 982879294.897281 2845 DATA?
Feb 23 00:01:34 gw smtpd: 982879294.909681 2845 354 go
ahead?
Feb 23 00:02:25 gw smtpd: 982879345.847132 2823 451
timeout (#4.4.2)?
Feb 23 00:02:25 gw smtpd: 982879345.859363 2823 [EOF]
Feb 23 00:02:25 gw smtpd: 982879345.862978 tcpserver: end
2823 status 256
Feb 23 00:02:25 gw smtpd: 982879345.865111 tcpserver:
status: 3/40
Feb 23 00:08:26 gw smtpd: 982879706.896561 tcpserver:
status: 4/40
Feb 23 00:08:26 gw smtpd: 982879706.900966 tcpserver: pid
2848 from 194.221.211.145
Feb 23 00:08:53 gw smtpd: 982879733.705930 tcpserver: ok
2848 eurorisksystems.com:193.200.17.182:25
vwmail4.hypovereinsbank.de:194.221.211.145::60191
Feb 23 00:08:53 gw smtpd: 982879733.725160 2848 220
ms.eurorisksystems.com ESMTP?
Feb 23 00:08:57 gw smtpd: 982879737.562845 2848 EHLO
vwmail.HypoVereinsbank.DE?
Feb 23 00:08:57 gw smtpd: 982879737.566764 2848 250-
ms.eurorisksystems.com?
Feb 23 00:08:57 gw smtpd: 982879737.569507 2848 250-
PIPELINING?
Feb 23 00:08:57 gw smtpd: 982879737.572209 2848 250
8BITMIME?
Feb 23 00:08:59 gw smtpd: 982879739.230800 2848 MAIL
From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?
Feb 23 00:08:59 gw smtpd: 982879739.233885 2848 250 ok?
Feb 23 00:09:00 gw smtpd: 982879740.906551 2848 RCPT
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?
Feb 23 00:09:00 gw smtpd: 982879740.910252 2848 250 ok?
Feb 23 00:09:02 gw smtpd: 982879742.787501 2848 DATA?
Feb 23 00:09:02 gw smtpd: 982879742.799031 2848 354 go
ahead?
Feb 23 00:10:27 gw smtpd: 982879827.147181 2826 451
timeout (#4.4.2)?
Feb 23 00:10:27 gw smtpd: 982879827.156967 2826 [EOF]
Feb 23 00:10:27 gw smtpd: 982879827.162034 tcpserver: end
2826 status 256
LOG end-----
My machine is eurorisksystems.com. The other machine is
vwmail4.hypovereinsbank.de.
I can't receive any mail from the usa.net servers either.
The output of qmail-ctrl is:
qmail home directory: /var/qmail.
user-ext delimiter: -.
paternalism (in decimal): 2.
silent concurrency limit: 120.
subdirectory split: 23.
user ids: 200, 201, 202, 0, 203, 204, 205, 206.
group ids: 200, 201.
badmailfrom: (Default.) Any MAIL FROM is allowed.
bouncefrom: (Default.) Bounce user name is MAILER-DAEMON.
bouncehost: (Default.) Bounce host name is
ms.eurorisksystems.com.
concurrencylocal: (Default.) Local concurrency is 10.
concurrencyremote: (Default.) Remote concurrency is 20.
databytes: SMTP DATA limit is 50000000 bytes.
defaultdomain: Default domain name is gw.ers.bg.
defaulthost: (Default.) Default host name is
ms.eurorisksystems.com.
doublebouncehost: (Default.) 2B recipient host:
ms.eurorisksystems.com.
doublebounceto: (Default.) 2B recipient user: postmaster.
envnoathost: (Default.) Presumed domain name is
ms.eurorisksystems.com.
helohost: (Default.) SMTP client HELO host name is
ms.eurorisksystems.com.
idhost: (Default.) Message-ID host name is
ms.eurorisksystems.com.
localiphost: (Default.) Local IP address becomes
ms.eurorisksystems.com.
locals:
Messages for localhost are delivered locally.
Messages for gw.ers.bg are delivered locally.
Messages for ms.eurorisksystems.com are delivered locally.
me: My name is ms.eurorisksystems.com.
percenthack: (Default.) The percent hack is not allowed.
plusdomain: Plus domain name is gw.ers.bg.
qmqpservers: (Default.) No QMQP servers.
queuelifetime: (Default.) Message lifetime in the queue is
604800 seconds.
rcpthosts:
SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at
eurorisksystems.com.
morercpthosts: (Default.) No effect.
morercpthosts.cdb: (Default.) No effect.
smtpgreeting: (Default.) SMTP greeting: 220
ms.eurorisksystems.com.
smtproutes: (Default.) No artificial SMTP routes.
timeoutconnect: (Default.) SMTP client connection timeout
is 60 seconds.
timeoutremote: (Default.) SMTP client data timeout is 1200
seconds.
timeoutsmtpd: (Default.) SMTP server data timeout is 1200
seconds.
virtualdomains:
Virtual domain: varna.nhif.bg:varna-nhif-bg
Virtual domain: eurorisksystems.com:eurorisksystems-com
Please help!!!
Saso.
3 ������ ��������� �������� ������ � Golden VIP ����� http://www.bitex.com
hello all
using qmail-1.03 daemontools .70 and ucspi-88 on several RH 6.2 based
servers.
It appears that all logging is being dumped to the first virtual console:
info msg 224981: bytes 32957 from <#@[]> qp 9474 uid 0
starting delivery 1692: msg 224981 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
delivery 1692: success: did_1+0+0/
status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
end msg 224981
new msg 224981
info msg 224981: bytes 3235 from
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 9479 uid 0
starting delivery 1693: msg 224981 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
delivery 1693: success: did_1+0+0/
status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
end msg 224981
even though I have log/run set up EXACTLY as in the supervise man page.
Is this a supervise/multilog bug? anyone getting qmail to log deliveries
to multilog using log/run ?
Any advise would be helpful.
Paul Farber
Farber Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph 570-628-5303
Fax 570-628-5545
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 10:33:57AM -0500, Paul Farber wrote:
> It appears that all logging is being dumped to the first virtual console:
>
> info msg 224981: bytes 32957 from <#@[]> qp 9474 uid 0
> starting delivery 1692: msg 224981 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
> delivery 1692: success: did_1+0+0/
> status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
> end msg 224981
> new msg 224981
> info msg 224981: bytes 3235 from
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 9479 uid 0
> starting delivery 1693: msg 224981 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
> delivery 1693: success: did_1+0+0/
> status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
> end msg 224981
>
> even though I have log/run set up EXACTLY as in the supervise man page.
> Is this a supervise/multilog bug? anyone getting qmail to log deliveries
> to multilog using log/run ?
Did you set the sticky bit on your qmail service directory?
Chris
PGP signature
Paul Farber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>even though I have log/run set up EXACTLY as in the supervise man
>page.
Including the sticky bit on the on the qmail-send directory?
>Is this a supervise/multilog bug?
No.
>anyone getting qmail to log deliveries
>to multilog using log/run ?
Of course.
>Any advise would be helpful.
Provide more useful information than 'I set it up right and it doesn't
work'. For example, the output of:
cd [supervise directory]
ls -lR
cat */run */log/run
-Dave
I have
drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:40 service
and under that
drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:40 .
drwxr-xr-x 13 root qmail 4096 Feb 20 23:20 ..
drwxr-sr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:11 qmail
drwxr-sr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:35 qmail-smtpd
Since the manual (man chmod) or the qmail-conf program docs didn't allude
to it... what is the 'sticky bit'?
Paul Farber
Farber Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph 570-628-5303
Fax 570-628-5545
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Chris Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 10:33:57AM -0500, Paul Farber wrote:
> > It appears that all logging is being dumped to the first virtual console:
> >
> > info msg 224981: bytes 32957 from <#@[]> qp 9474 uid 0
> > starting delivery 1692: msg 224981 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
> > delivery 1692: success: did_1+0+0/
> > status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
> > end msg 224981
> > new msg 224981
> > info msg 224981: bytes 3235 from
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 9479 uid 0
> > starting delivery 1693: msg 224981 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
> > delivery 1693: success: did_1+0+0/
> > status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
> > end msg 224981
> >
> > even though I have log/run set up EXACTLY as in the supervise man page.
> > Is this a supervise/multilog bug? anyone getting qmail to log deliveries
> > to multilog using log/run ?
>
> Did you set the sticky bit on your qmail service directory?
>
> Chris
>
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 12:13:37PM -0500, Paul Farber wrote:
> drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:40 service
>
> and under that
>
> drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:40 .
> drwxr-xr-x 13 root qmail 4096 Feb 20 23:20 ..
> drwxr-sr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:11 qmail
> drwxr-sr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:35 qmail-smtpd
>
> Since the manual (man chmod) or the qmail-conf program docs didn't allude
> to it... what is the 'sticky bit'?
chmod +t the directory. (Are you sure man chmod doesn't refer to this?)
From http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/svscan.html:
"If a subdirectory sub is sticky, svscan starts a pair of supervise processes,
one for sub, one for sub/log, with a pipe between them. svscan needs two free
descriptors for each pipe."
Chris
PGP signature
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 12:13:37PM -0500, Paul Farber wrote:
> I have
>
> drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:40 service
>
> and under that
>
> drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:40 .
> drwxr-xr-x 13 root qmail 4096 Feb 20 23:20 ..
> drwxr-sr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:11 qmail
> drwxr-sr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:35 qmail-smtpd
>
> Since the manual (man chmod) or the qmail-conf program docs didn't allude
> to it... what is the 'sticky bit'?
Hmm. Solaris manpage talks about it as does FreeBSD - you must be on
Linux, right? In octal it is 1000 or symbolically, +t. Thus:
chmod +t /service/qmail
Regards.
>
>
>
> Paul Farber
> Farber Technology
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Ph 570-628-5303
> Fax 570-628-5545
>
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Chris Johnson wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 10:33:57AM -0500, Paul Farber wrote:
> > > It appears that all logging is being dumped to the first virtual console:
> > >
> > > info msg 224981: bytes 32957 from <#@[]> qp 9474 uid 0
> > > starting delivery 1692: msg 224981 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
> > > delivery 1692: success: did_1+0+0/
> > > status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
> > > end msg 224981
> > > new msg 224981
> > > info msg 224981: bytes 3235 from
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 9479 uid 0
> > > starting delivery 1693: msg 224981 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
> > > delivery 1693: success: did_1+0+0/
> > > status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
> > > end msg 224981
> > >
> > > even though I have log/run set up EXACTLY as in the supervise man page.
> > > Is this a supervise/multilog bug? anyone getting qmail to log deliveries
> > > to multilog using log/run ?
> >
> > Did you set the sticky bit on your qmail service directory?
> >
> > Chris
> >
>
DOH!!!!
The manpage I have referneces .70 but nothing about a sticky bit.... oh
well, live and learn.. and learn and learn and learn!
Paul Farber
Farber Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph 570-628-5303
Fax 570-628-5545
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Chris Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 12:13:37PM -0500, Paul Farber wrote:
> > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:40 service
> >
> > and under that
> >
> > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:40 .
> > drwxr-xr-x 13 root qmail 4096 Feb 20 23:20 ..
> > drwxr-sr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:11 qmail
> > drwxr-sr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:35 qmail-smtpd
> >
> > Since the manual (man chmod) or the qmail-conf program docs didn't allude
> > to it... what is the 'sticky bit'?
>
> chmod +t the directory. (Are you sure man chmod doesn't refer to this?)
>
> From http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/svscan.html:
>
> "If a subdirectory sub is sticky, svscan starts a pair of supervise processes,
> one for sub, one for sub/log, with a pipe between them. svscan needs two free
> descriptors for each pipe."
>
> Chris
>
Tried that...
but it will not fire off a copy of multilog:
3181 ? S 0:00 supervise qmail-smtpd
3182 ? S 0:00 /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -qDHR
-ladmin.f-tech.net -xt
here is some file info:
drwxr-sr-t 5 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:35 qmail-smtpd
./run=
#!/bin/sh
exec 2>&1 \
envdir ./env \
sh -c '
case "$REMOTENAME" in h) H=;; p) H=p;; *) H=H;; esac
case "$REMOTEINFO" in r) R=;; [0-9]*) R="t$REMOTEINFO";; *) R=R;; esac
exec \
/usr/local/bin/envuidgid qmaild \
softlimit ${DATALIMIT+"-d$DATALIMIT"} \
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver \
-qD"$H$R" \
${LOCALNAME+"-l$LOCALNAME"} \
${BACKLOG+"-b$BACKLOG"} \
${CONCURRENCY+"-c$CONCURRENCY"} \
-xtcp.cdb \
-- "${IP-0}" "${PORT-25}" \
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
'
./run/log=
[root@admin log]# cat run
#!/bin/sh
exec \
setuidgid qmaill \
multilog t ./main
./mail is empty... and there is no multilog process running
Paul Farber
Farber Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph 570-628-5303
Fax 570-628-5545
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Chris Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 12:13:37PM -0500, Paul Farber wrote:
> > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:40 service
> >
> > and under that
> >
> > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:40 .
> > drwxr-xr-x 13 root qmail 4096 Feb 20 23:20 ..
> > drwxr-sr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:11 qmail
> > drwxr-sr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:35 qmail-smtpd
> >
> > Since the manual (man chmod) or the qmail-conf program docs didn't allude
> > to it... what is the 'sticky bit'?
>
> chmod +t the directory. (Are you sure man chmod doesn't refer to this?)
>
> From http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/svscan.html:
>
> "If a subdirectory sub is sticky, svscan starts a pair of supervise processes,
> one for sub, one for sub/log, with a pipe between them. svscan needs two free
> descriptors for each pipe."
>
> Chris
>
Assuminmg you're running this all via svscan, the problem is that
svscan only notices the +t flag when it first sees the directory in
/service.
You need to remove the service and re-add it. I believe the
daemontools page at cr.yp.to has the sequence needed to do this.
Regards.
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 03:05:23PM -0500, Paul Farber wrote:
> Tried that...
>
>
> but it will not fire off a copy of multilog:
>
> 3181 ? S 0:00 supervise qmail-smtpd
> 3182 ? S 0:00 /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -qDHR
> -ladmin.f-tech.net -xt
>
> here is some file info:
>
> drwxr-sr-t 5 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:35 qmail-smtpd
>
> ./run=
>
> #!/bin/sh
> exec 2>&1 \
> envdir ./env \
> sh -c '
> case "$REMOTENAME" in h) H=;; p) H=p;; *) H=H;; esac
> case "$REMOTEINFO" in r) R=;; [0-9]*) R="t$REMOTEINFO";; *) R=R;; esac
> exec \
> /usr/local/bin/envuidgid qmaild \
> softlimit ${DATALIMIT+"-d$DATALIMIT"} \
> /usr/local/bin/tcpserver \
> -qD"$H$R" \
> ${LOCALNAME+"-l$LOCALNAME"} \
> ${BACKLOG+"-b$BACKLOG"} \
> ${CONCURRENCY+"-c$CONCURRENCY"} \
> -xtcp.cdb \
> -- "${IP-0}" "${PORT-25}" \
> /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
> '
>
> ./run/log=
>
> [root@admin log]# cat run
> #!/bin/sh
> exec \
> setuidgid qmaill \
> multilog t ./main
>
> ./mail is empty... and there is no multilog process running
>
> Paul Farber
> Farber Technology
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Ph 570-628-5303
> Fax 570-628-5545
>
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Chris Johnson wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 12:13:37PM -0500, Paul Farber wrote:
> > > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:40 service
> > >
> > > and under that
> > >
> > > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:40 .
> > > drwxr-xr-x 13 root qmail 4096 Feb 20 23:20 ..
> > > drwxr-sr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:11 qmail
> > > drwxr-sr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:35 qmail-smtpd
> > >
> > > Since the manual (man chmod) or the qmail-conf program docs didn't allude
> > > to it... what is the 'sticky bit'?
> >
> > chmod +t the directory. (Are you sure man chmod doesn't refer to this?)
> >
> > From http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/svscan.html:
> >
> > "If a subdirectory sub is sticky, svscan starts a pair of supervise processes,
> > one for sub, one for sub/log, with a pipe between them. svscan needs two free
> > descriptors for each pipe."
> >
> > Chris
> >
>
Is there a specific kernel setting I need for supervise to log
correctly??? I am on kernel 2.4.1.... it's working fine on a RH 6.2
machine with 2.2.17 (using djbdns).
The sticky bit seemed to have no effect.. and nothing is being logged
error-wise.
Paul Farber
Farber Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph 570-628-5303
Fax 570-628-5545
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Chris Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 12:13:37PM -0500, Paul Farber wrote:
> > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:40 service
> >
> > and under that
> >
> > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:40 .
> > drwxr-xr-x 13 root qmail 4096 Feb 20 23:20 ..
> > drwxr-sr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:11 qmail
> > drwxr-sr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:35 qmail-smtpd
> >
> > Since the manual (man chmod) or the qmail-conf program docs didn't allude
> > to it... what is the 'sticky bit'?
>
> chmod +t the directory. (Are you sure man chmod doesn't refer to this?)
>
> From http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/svscan.html:
>
> "If a subdirectory sub is sticky, svscan starts a pair of supervise processes,
> one for sub, one for sub/log, with a pipe between them. svscan needs two free
> descriptors for each pipe."
>
> Chris
>
For debugging purposes you might want to run svscan manually so the
errors go to the screen/window you're on.
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 06:25:11PM -0500, Paul Farber wrote:
> Is there a specific kernel setting I need for supervise to log
Not unless it's some wierd Unix. svscan writes errors to stderr. You
don't need kernel settings to control where that goes.
> correctly??? I am on kernel 2.4.1.... it's working fine on a RH 6.2
> machine with 2.2.17 (using djbdns).
>
> The sticky bit seemed to have no effect..
Did you restart svscan?
> and nothing is being logged error-wise.
Did you check the system console?
Regards.
>
> Paul Farber
> Farber Technology
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Ph 570-628-5303
> Fax 570-628-5545
>
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Chris Johnson wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 12:13:37PM -0500, Paul Farber wrote:
> > > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:40 service
> > >
> > > and under that
> > >
> > > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:40 .
> > > drwxr-xr-x 13 root qmail 4096 Feb 20 23:20 ..
> > > drwxr-sr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:11 qmail
> > > drwxr-sr-x 5 root root 4096 Feb 21 01:35 qmail-smtpd
> > >
> > > Since the manual (man chmod) or the qmail-conf program docs didn't allude
> > > to it... what is the 'sticky bit'?
> >
> > chmod +t the directory. (Are you sure man chmod doesn't refer to this?)
> >
> > From http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/svscan.html:
> >
> > "If a subdirectory sub is sticky, svscan starts a pair of supervise processes,
> > one for sub, one for sub/log, with a pipe between them. svscan needs two free
> > descriptors for each pipe."
> >
> > Chris
> >
>
Hi,
Im trying to get tcpserver to work with my simple
program written in C. However, Im getting unexpected
results. My programm on execution is supposed to print
a welcome message to stdout, then read text from stdin
, then writes into stdout again. The source code looks
something like this.
...
printf("Welcome! Enter your name\n");
scanf("%s",name);
printf("Hello %s",name);
...
I use tcpserver to execute that program when there is
a connection to localhost on port 123 , like so
tcpserver 127.0.0.1 123 programname
however when i try telneting to 127.0.0.1 123
I dont get any "Welcome message" from my program.
upon telneting the programm is waiting for me to input
something... When I enter somthing , only then do I
get
the "Welcome..." then "Hello ".
------------------------------------------
bash-2.04$ telnet 127.0.0.1 555
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to 127.0.0.1.
Escape character is '^]'.
Bob
Welcome! Enter your name:
Hello Bob
------------------------------------------
It does the input first, and then all the output in
one shot!
Any ideas why that is happening or how to get it to
work???
Newbie.
_______________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.ca address at http://mail.yahoo.ca
John Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Im trying to get tcpserver to work with my simple program written in C.
[...]
> It does the input first, and then all the output in one shot!
>
> Any ideas why that is happening or how to get it to work???
You posted this same question yesterday. Someone replied to your question,
giving you the answer. You appear to have not read it. Go back and read
the response you got -- look at the list archives if you have to.
If you don't like the answer you received for some reason, tell us why --
don't just repost your question. That just annoys people, and gets you
nowhere.
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi,
I am not shure if I posted this question correctly, I am
repeting my self, sorry.
I am using qmail1.03 with tcpserver.
I can receive mail from almost all sites in the net ( for
example yahoo.com), but there are few that cannot send mail
to me ( for example the usa.net servers). They establish a
connection but seize data transmition and qmail timeouts.
Here is the session log:
Log start----
Feb 22 23:49:53 gw smtpd: 982878593.400905 tcpserver: pid
2826 from 194.221.211.145
Feb 22 23:50:19 gw smtpd: 982878619.435991 tcpserver: ok
2826 eurorisksystems.com:193.200.17.182:25
vwmail4.hypovereinsbank.de:194.221.211.145::59228
Feb 22 23:50:19 gw smtpd: 982878619.454757 2826 220
ms.eurorisksystems.com ESMTP?
Feb 22 23:50:22 gw smtpd: 982878622.354098 2826 EHLO
vwmail.HypoVereinsbank.DE?
Feb 22 23:50:22 gw smtpd: 982878622.358529 2826 250-
ms.eurorisksystems.com?
Feb 22 23:50:22 gw smtpd: 982878622.361590 2826 250-
PIPELINING?
Feb 22 23:50:22 gw smtpd: 982878622.364295 2826 250
8BITMIME?
Feb 22 23:50:23 gw smtpd: 982878623.783361 2826 MAIL
From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?
Feb 22 23:50:23 gw smtpd: 982878623.787308 2826 250 ok?
Feb 22 23:50:25 gw smtpd: 982878625.563224 2826 RCPT
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?
Feb 22 23:50:25 gw smtpd: 982878625.568568 2826 250 ok?
Feb 22 23:50:27 gw smtpd: 982878627.139794 2826 DATA?
Feb 22 23:50:27 gw smtpd: 982878627.153254 2826 354 go
ahead?
Feb 22 23:54:10 gw smtpd: 982878850.895510 2818 451
timeout (#4.4.2)?
Feb 22 23:54:10 gw smtpd: 982878850.898664 2818 [EOF]
Feb 22 23:54:10 gw smtpd: 982878850.909532 tcpserver: end
2818 status 256
Feb 22 23:54:10 gw smtpd: 982878850.914715 tcpserver:
status: 2/40
Feb 22 23:57:12 gw smtpd: 982879032.075360 tcpserver:
status: 3/40
Feb 22 23:57:12 gw smtpd: 982879032.080109 tcpserver: pid
2831 from 193.158.192.31
Feb 22 23:57:14 gw smtpd: 982879034.501498 tcpserver: ok
2831 eurorisksystems.com:193.200.17.182:25 vwmail-
b.hypovereinsbank.de:193.158.192.31::55482
Feb 22 23:57:14 gw smtpd: 982879034.519838 2831 220
ms.eurorisksystems.com ESMTP?
Feb 22 23:57:15 gw smtpd: 982879035.885164 2831 EHLO
vwmail-b.HypoVereinsbank.de?
Feb 22 23:57:15 gw smtpd: 982879035.888215 2831 250-
ms.eurorisksystems.com?
Feb 22 23:57:15 gw smtpd: 982879035.890929 2831 250-
PIPELINING?
Feb 22 23:57:15 gw smtpd: 982879035.893633 2831 250
8BITMIME?
Feb 22 23:57:27 gw smtpd: 982879047.679537 2831 MAIL
From:?
Feb 22 23:57:27 gw smtpd: 982879047.683208 2831 250 ok?
Feb 22 23:57:28 gw smtpd: 982879048.914208 2831 RCPT
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?
Feb 22 23:57:28 gw smtpd: 982879048.917883 2831 250 ok?
Feb 22 23:57:30 gw smtpd: 982879050.464026 2831 DATA?
Feb 22 23:57:30 gw smtpd: 982879050.475434 2831 354 go
ahead?
Feb 23 00:01:02 gw smtpd: 982879262.959661 tcpserver:
status: 4/40
Feb 23 00:01:02 gw smtpd: 982879262.964829 tcpserver: pid
2845 from 194.221.211.145
Feb 23 00:01:28 gw smtpd: 982879288.995972 tcpserver: ok
2845 eurorisksystems.com:193.200.17.182:25
vwmail4.hypovereinsbank.de:194.221.211.145::59740
Feb 23 00:01:29 gw smtpd: 982879289.015136 2845 220
ms.eurorisksystems.com ESMTP?
Feb 23 00:01:30 gw smtpd: 982879290.037731 2845 EHLO
vwmail.HypoVereinsbank.DE?
Feb 23 00:01:30 gw smtpd: 982879290.040721 2845 250-
ms.eurorisksystems.com?
Feb 23 00:01:30 gw smtpd: 982879290.043457 2845 250-
PIPELINING?
Feb 23 00:01:30 gw smtpd: 982879290.046194 2845 250
8BITMIME?
Feb 23 00:01:31 gw smtpd: 982879291.457610 2845 MAIL
From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?
Feb 23 00:01:31 gw smtpd: 982879291.461524 2845 250 ok?
Feb 23 00:01:33 gw smtpd: 982879293.127466 2845 RCPT
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?
Feb 23 00:01:33 gw smtpd: 982879293.131349 2845 250 ok?
Feb 23 00:01:34 gw smtpd: 982879294.897281 2845 DATA?
Feb 23 00:01:34 gw smtpd: 982879294.909681 2845 354 go
ahead?
Feb 23 00:02:25 gw smtpd: 982879345.847132 2823 451
timeout (#4.4.2)?
Feb 23 00:02:25 gw smtpd: 982879345.859363 2823 [EOF]
Feb 23 00:02:25 gw smtpd: 982879345.862978 tcpserver: end
2823 status 256
Feb 23 00:02:25 gw smtpd: 982879345.865111 tcpserver:
status: 3/40
Feb 23 00:08:26 gw smtpd: 982879706.896561 tcpserver:
status: 4/40
Feb 23 00:08:26 gw smtpd: 982879706.900966 tcpserver: pid
2848 from 194.221.211.145
Feb 23 00:08:53 gw smtpd: 982879733.705930 tcpserver: ok
2848 eurorisksystems.com:193.200.17.182:25
vwmail4.hypovereinsbank.de:194.221.211.145::60191
Feb 23 00:08:53 gw smtpd: 982879733.725160 2848 220
ms.eurorisksystems.com ESMTP?
Feb 23 00:08:57 gw smtpd: 982879737.562845 2848 EHLO
vwmail.HypoVereinsbank.DE?
Feb 23 00:08:57 gw smtpd: 982879737.566764 2848 250-
ms.eurorisksystems.com?
Feb 23 00:08:57 gw smtpd: 982879737.569507 2848 250-
PIPELINING?
Feb 23 00:08:57 gw smtpd: 982879737.572209 2848 250
8BITMIME?
Feb 23 00:08:59 gw smtpd: 982879739.230800 2848 MAIL
From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?
Feb 23 00:08:59 gw smtpd: 982879739.233885 2848 250 ok?
Feb 23 00:09:00 gw smtpd: 982879740.906551 2848 RCPT
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?
Feb 23 00:09:00 gw smtpd: 982879740.910252 2848 250 ok?
Feb 23 00:09:02 gw smtpd: 982879742.787501 2848 DATA?
Feb 23 00:09:02 gw smtpd: 982879742.799031 2848 354 go
ahead?
Feb 23 00:10:27 gw smtpd: 982879827.147181 2826 451
timeout (#4.4.2)?
Feb 23 00:10:27 gw smtpd: 982879827.156967 2826 [EOF]
Feb 23 00:10:27 gw smtpd: 982879827.162034 tcpserver: end
2826 status 256
Log end ----
Here is the output of qmail-ctrl:
Output start -----
qmail home directory: /var/qmail.
user-ext delimiter: -.
paternalism (in decimal): 2.
silent concurrency limit: 120.
subdirectory split: 23.
user ids: 200, 201, 202, 0, 203, 204, 205, 206.
group ids: 200, 201.
badmailfrom: (Default.) Any MAIL FROM is allowed.
bouncefrom: (Default.) Bounce user name is MAILER-DAEMON.
bouncehost: (Default.) Bounce host name is
ms.eurorisksystems.com.
concurrencylocal: (Default.) Local concurrency is 10.
concurrencyremote: (Default.) Remote concurrency is 20.
databytes: SMTP DATA limit is 50000000 bytes.
defaultdomain: Default domain name is gw.ers.bg.
defaulthost: (Default.) Default host name is
ms.eurorisksystems.com.
doublebouncehost: (Default.) 2B recipient host:
ms.eurorisksystems.com.
doublebounceto: (Default.) 2B recipient user: postmaster.
envnoathost: (Default.) Presumed domain name is
ms.eurorisksystems.com.
helohost: (Default.) SMTP client HELO host name is
ms.eurorisksystems.com.
idhost: (Default.) Message-ID host name is
ms.eurorisksystems.com.
localiphost: (Default.) Local IP address becomes
ms.eurorisksystems.com.
locals:
Messages for localhost are delivered locally.
Messages for gw.ers.bg are delivered locally.
Messages for ms.eurorisksystems.com are delivered locally.
me: My name is ms.eurorisksystems.com.
percenthack: (Default.) The percent hack is not allowed.
plusdomain: Plus domain name is gw.ers.bg.
qmqpservers: (Default.) No QMQP servers.
queuelifetime: (Default.) Message lifetime in the queue is
604800 seconds.
rcpthosts:
SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at
eurorisksystems.com.
morercpthosts: (Default.) No effect.
morercpthosts.cdb: (Default.) No effect.
smtpgreeting: (Default.) SMTP greeting: 220
ms.eurorisksystems.com.
smtproutes: (Default.) No artificial SMTP routes.
timeoutconnect: (Default.) SMTP client connection timeout
is 60 seconds.
timeoutremote: (Default.) SMTP client data timeout is 1200
seconds.
timeoutsmtpd: (Default.) SMTP server data timeout is 1200
seconds.
virtualdomains:
Virtual domain: varna.nhif.bg:varna-nhif-bg
Virtual domain: eurorisksystems.com:eurorisksystems-com
Output end ------
Please Help!!!!
saso.
Saso Dundev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I can receive mail from almost all sites in the net ( for example yahoo.com),
> but there are few that cannot send mail to me ( for example the usa.net
> servers). They establish a connection but seize data transmition and qmail
> timeouts.
This could be an issue with SMTP line endings -- the particular remote sites
which are having problems sending to you may be violating the spec by
not sending \r\n, particularly at the end of the DATA phase.
Use recordio with qmail-smtpd to record an example of the faulty session.
If the resulting log doesn't mean anything to you, post it here.
See djb's site and www.qmail.org for info on how to set up and use recordio.
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Thursday 22 February 2001 11:20, Brett Randall wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > ns1:/usr/src/qmail-scanner-0.95# ./qmail-scanner-queue.pl -g
> > Script is not setuid/setgid in suidperl
> > ns1:/usr/src/qmail-scanner-0.95#
> >
> > Trying the test script gives:
> >
> > ns1:/usr/src/qmail-scanner-0.95/contrib# ./test_installation.sh -doit
> > setting QMAILQUEUE to /var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl for this
> > test...
> >
> > Sending eicar test virus - should be caught by perlscanner module...
> > Script is not setuid/setgid in suidperl
> > qmail-inject: fatal: qq temporary problem (#4.3.0)
> > done!
>
> What is this qq error? I can't use qmail-scanner and I REALLY need
> to, but every message that I receive gets lost to this error. Any
> body know why/how to fix?
It might be that suidperl and qmail-scanner...pl are not suid (4755) or that
you're not giving enough memory so qmail can start perl. Take a look at your
softlimit. It must be about 4 times the value specified in LWQ
[]s
Davi
|
I have installed qmail 1.03. My problem is local
deliveries are very slow.
Also on my mail servers most the mails are meant
for local domains.
Is there any way that I can make qmail-queue
directly dispatch the mail
to the user's
maildir without queueing.
my .qmail-default contains the following
line
| /var/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail ''
bounce-no-mailbox
Any help on this will help me a lot
Regards
Manny
|
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 09:20:32PM +0530, Manvendra Bhangui wrote:
> I have installed qmail 1.03. My problem is local deliveries are very slow.
> Also on my mail servers most the mails are meant for local domains.
> Is there any way that I can make qmail-queue directly dispatch the mail
> to the user's maildir without queueing.
No. qmail-queue doesn't have the needed privileges.
Such a system would also have no good way of dealing with deferrals
and partially-failed deliveries (multiple .qmail lines).
Greetz, Peter.
Hello,
* jerry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010223 05:09] wrote:
> I install with Redhat 7.0, but qmail FAQ only has something in inetd.conf, and
>Redhat 7.0 change the file to xinetd.conf, I don't know how to install with it.
>
> jerry
>
Example rules for xinetd.conf:
service smtp
{
socket_type = stream
protocol = tcp
wait = no
user = qmaild
server = /var/qmail/bin/tcp-env
server_args = /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
instances = 30
}
service pop-3
{
log_type = SYSLOG daemon
log_on_success = PID HOST EXIT DURATION
log_on_failure = HOST ATTEMPT RECORD
socket_type = stream
protocol = tcp
wait = no
user = root
server = /usr/sbin/popa3d
instances = 30
}
service pop3s
{
log_type = SYSLOG daemon
log_on_success = PID HOST EXIT DURATION
log_on_failure = HOST ATTEMPT RECORD
socket_type = stream
protocol = tcp
wait = no
user = stunnel
server = /usr/sbin/stunnel
server_args = -r 127.0.0.1:110
instances = 30
}
greets,
--
pawel garbowski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear All,
I have installed qmail succefully on RH 7.0. it successfully rceievs messages
and save it in ~user/Mbox. I wan to change it to /var/spool/mail. For this
pupose I used binm2 file as rc. But still it does'nt work and don't send mail
to /var/spool/mail as well as in Mbox.
Now anybody can help me to configure it in a way that it can send mail to
/var/spool/mail.
Kashan
____________________________________________________________________
Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
finally!
http://www.microsoft.com&[EMAIL PROTECTED]/pub/mskb/Q209354.asp
~kurth
I received NO responses... please help me...
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 10:25 AM
Subject: qmail-qfilter ~ Help...
:
:
:
: Okay, I've tried to install qmail-filter and thought
: I did everything correctly... but it's not filtering out
: anything...
:
: Here's what I did...
:
: edited Makefile (added -DQMAIL_QUEUE=\"/var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue-old\" )
: so that I didn't have to install QMAILQUEUE patch
:
: make (looked like it worked ok)
:
: mv qmail-queue qmail-queue-old
:
: created qmail-queue with the following:
:
: #!/bin/sh
: exec /path/to/qmai:-qfilter /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject -n
:
: chmod +x qmail-queue
:
: restarted qmail and qmail-smtpd
:
: Sent test message to myself with .VBS attachment (went through ok)
:
: Ran (in the 'samples' directory) ./deny-filetypes
:
: Sent another message... Still went through...
:
:
: What I am doing wrong??? Please help, thanks!!!
:
: Jesse
:
:
Hi all,
I know that databyte <n> will limit the size of outbound mail
from qmail-smtpd to <n> bytes, but which file does it go into in
/var/qmail/control?
On a unrelated note, I use cyclog to rotate my log files, can I
add a -size parameter to increase the size of the log file, before
it is closed, and a new one is opened?
-Bill
Bill Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I know that databyte <n> will limit the size of outbound mail
> from qmail-smtpd to <n> bytes, but which file does it go into in
> /var/qmail/control?
Doesn't it only restrict the size of received (incoming) mail? The
file you're looking for is /var/qmail/control/databytes, and it should
contain only the integer number.
> On a unrelated note, I use cyclog to rotate my log files, can I
> add a -size parameter to increase the size of the log file, before
> it is closed, and a new one is opened?
Can't comment on cyclog; it's been too long since I used it. With multilog,
it would just be adding "s<size>" to the commandline.
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 09:47:41AM -0800, Bill Parker wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I know that databyte <n> will limit the size of outbound mail
> from qmail-smtpd to <n> bytes, but which file does it go into in
> /var/qmail/control?
Just put the number of bytes in /var/qmail/control/databytes. The
keyword 'databyte' is not used anywhere.
Greetz, Peter.
David,
Thanks for the tip about the locals file. That seems to have done the trick
for stopping the local deliveries.
I have another problem now during testing.
I have configured the new qmail server (qmail.our_lan.com) to respond as
though it is our existing mail server (externalmail.com) by making
defaultdomain, me, and rcpthosts contain "externalmail.com". The rcpthosts
also contains "our_lan.com" so that it will accept mail from the internal
servers for relaying.
In order to test that the fastforward aliases I have set-up actually work,
I am telnetting into the qmail server on port 25 and manually creating a
message as described in the TEST.receive file. I can not just send mail
from an external account as the real mail server would grab the message.
For testing purposes only, I want to tell qmail *not* to query the DNS. I
want it to accept that the local machine is externalmail.com, instead of
resolving to the real externalmail.com.
I have read in the tcpserver man page that it is apparently possible to
tell qmail to ignore the DNS and use the parameters provided, but this does
not seem to be working for me. My /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run file
looks like this:
#!/bin/sh
QMAILDUID=`/usr/xpg4/bin/id -u qmaild`
NOFILESGID=`/usr/xpg4/bin/id -g qmaild`
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 2000000 \
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -R -H -l externalmail.com \
-x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb \
-u "$QMAILDUID" -g "$NOFILESGID" \
0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1
Mail is still getting sent to the existing mail server at externalmail.com.
I have tried adding "externalmail.com:[192.168.2.52]" (which is the IP of
the qmail server) to smtproutes, but this just causes a loop.
I have created ~alias/.qmail-default containing "|
/var/qmail/bin/fastforward -d /etc/aliases.cdb" but qmail never seems to
get to that point.
I have even changed ~control/defaultdelivery to "|
/var/qmail/bin/fastforward -d /etc/aliases.cdb" in the hopes that it would
help, but it hasn't.
I'm sure that I am missing something, but I can not figure out what. I'm
sure it will be a "DOH!" when someone points it out to me.
Assistance would be appreciated as I am *this* close to finishing, but am
stuck on this one detail.
TIA
Dion Vansevenant
Internetwork Administrator
MRO.com
Dave Sill
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.ornl.gov> cc:
Subject: Re: Mail hub for relay and
outgoing only - no local
2001/02/20
15:45
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>1) How do I prevent qmail from trying to deliver locally on the qmail
>server?
Leave control/locals empty.
>2) How can I correctly set-up the group redirects in a way that will
>eliminate (if not reduce) duplication due to an error sending to one
>address in the group?
List the members in the appropriate ~alias/.qmail-* file.
>3) What would be a good way of redirecting local names to the appropriate
>email address for the local messages from our Sun servers (ie: bobs ->
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]): individual /var/qmail/alias files, or some other
>method?
.qmail files in ~alias.
-Dave
No one helped me with my original problems, but I think that's because they
thought I was a moron...
BUT I still have faith... Here's what happens now when I send a message to
myself (attached with one of the banned extensions)
failure:
192.168.2.26_failed_after_I_sent_the_message./Remote_host_said:_554_mail_ser
ver_permanently_rejected_message_(#5.3.0)/
Here's what I have as my 'qmail-queue' in /var/qmail/bin
#!/bin/sh
exec /var/qmail/bin/qmail-qfilter /var/qmail/bin/deny-filetypes
If there's no 'banned' attachment, it goes through okay...
and I receive a bounce saying
192.168.2.26 failed after I sent the message.
Remote host said: 554 mail server permanently rejected message (#5.3.0)
How do I get qmail-filter to add something about having a banned
extension... ???
Again, I am using the qmail-qfilter program without using QMAILQUEUE ...
Thanks!!!
Hi All,
I'm looking to make my log files /var/qmail/log hold more
info before starting a new file with cyclog:
I have modified my startup script line to look like this
for cyclog:
/usr/local/bin/cyclog -s256000 /var/log/qmail (start and
end stuff left off to save space)
Now according to the man page for cyclog:
cyclog [ -ssize ] [ -nnum ] [ -mmargin ] dir
where:
-ssize (Default: 104000. Minimum: 512.) Maximum file size.
After writing this many bytes to one file, cyclog will
start a new file.
Is there a space needed between the -s or not? I know I
have to stop and start qmail for this to take effect as
well (right?)
-Bill
Bill Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Now according to the man page for cyclog:
>
> cyclog [ -ssize ] [ -nnum ] [ -mmargin ] dir
[...]
> Is there a space needed between the -s or not?
No. You don't believe TFM?
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 01:02:57PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> Bill Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Now according to the man page for cyclog:
> >
> > cyclog [ -ssize ] [ -nnum ] [ -mmargin ] dir
> [...]
> > Is there a space needed between the -s or not?
>
> No. You don't believe TFM?
And... What happens when you try it both ways? Such an experiment
won't create world hunger - give it a try and report and discrepancies
with the documentation back to the list.
Sometimes a simple experiment is going to give you a more reliable
learning experience than just asking a list.
Regards.
Thanks for reading this OT message. I've subed to the Amavis list, but
hours later, I've had no confirmation!
qmail is working just fine. Installed AMaVis per INSTALL &
README.qmail. After making the symlinks to /usr/sbin/scanmails, I get
the following error message in syslog:
Feb 23 11:33:59 mail qmail: 982928039.242542 delivery 1: success:
DSorry,_I_couldn't_find_any_host_named_--._(#5.1.2)/
Feb 23 11:35:41 mail qmail: 982928141.394389 delivery 2: success:
DSorry,_I_couldn't_find_any_host_named_--._(#5.1.2)/
I have checked the rights to scanmails, and the symlinks and that
hasn't fixed the problem. This error msg happens via qmail-inject and
telnetting into 25. Removing the symlinks and rename the qmail-*-real
files back to qmail-* brings the system back online. Any thoughts??
TIA
.mark
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS/E/IT/O d- s+ a C++++$ L++++$> P+++$> L++ E--- W-- N+ o K- w-- !O
M- !V PS+ PE+ Y+ PGP t+ !5 X R- tv b+++ DI+ D- G e++ h--- r+++ z++++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
1.79x10^12 furlongs per fortnight -- it's not just a good idea, it's the
law!!
use Disclaimer;
my $opinion_only;
vQregister is new web-based signup CGI that
more than replaces the old vQsignup program
we released early last year. If you're running
vQsignup now, or you're considering allowing
users to signup for free accounts, it's worth
taking a look at.
We will be adding a new feature very soon
which will be used to collect demographic,
or any other information administrators might
want during the signup process. This information
might include their cleartext password, a
challenge password (for retrieving the cleartext
password over the phone), and other demographic
information such as zip codes, cities, etc.
We intend to make this fully configurable, so
that whatever information you wish to collect,
is easy to setup.
Head over to http://www.inter7.com/vqregister to
take a look at it.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc.
www.inter7.com - 847-492-0470
New prices! http://www.inter7.com/prices.html
Quite honestly this is a custom form that most of us code ourselves in php
to insert the info we need from users. What you really need to do is allow
us to pick our own fields...and integrate whatever html we want into it.
Regards,
Dan
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 09:52:06 -0600
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Inter7 introduces new software: vQregister
>
> vQregister is new web-based signup CGI that
> more than replaces the old vQsignup program
> we released early last year. If you're running
> vQsignup now, or you're considering allowing
> users to signup for free accounts, it's worth
> taking a look at.
>
> We will be adding a new feature very soon
> which will be used to collect demographic,
> or any other information administrators might
> want during the signup process. This information
> might include their cleartext password, a
> challenge password (for retrieving the cleartext
> password over the phone), and other demographic
> information such as zip codes, cities, etc.
> We intend to make this fully configurable, so
> that whatever information you wish to collect,
> is easy to setup.
>
> Head over to http://www.inter7.com/vqregister to
> take a look at it.
>
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc.
> www.inter7.com - 847-492-0470
> New prices! http://www.inter7.com/prices.html
>
Maybe what I said wasn't as clear as it could
have been. Exactly what you requested below,
is the feature we will be adding.
PHP is inefficient BTW. :)
Dan Phoenix wrote:
>
> Quite honestly this is a custom form that most of us code ourselves in php
> to insert the info we need from users. What you really need to do is allow
> us to pick our own fields...and integrate whatever html we want into it.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dan
>
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 09:52:06 -0600
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Inter7 introduces new software: vQregister
> >
> > vQregister is new web-based signup CGI that
> > more than replaces the old vQsignup program
> > we released early last year. If you're running
> > vQsignup now, or you're considering allowing
> > users to signup for free accounts, it's worth
> > taking a look at.
> >
> > We will be adding a new feature very soon
> > which will be used to collect demographic,
> > or any other information administrators might
> > want during the signup process. This information
> > might include their cleartext password, a
> > challenge password (for retrieving the cleartext
> > password over the phone), and other demographic
> > information such as zip codes, cities, etc.
> > We intend to make this fully configurable, so
> > that whatever information you wish to collect,
> > is easy to setup.
> >
> > Head over to http://www.inter7.com/vqregister to
> > take a look at it.
> >
> > --
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc.
> > www.inter7.com - 847-492-0470
> > New prices! http://www.inter7.com/prices.html
> >
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc.
www.inter7.com - 847-492-0470
New prices! http://www.inter7.com/prices.html
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 11:30:53AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Maybe what I said wasn't as clear as it could
> have been. Exactly what you requested below,
> is the feature we will be adding.
>
> PHP is inefficient BTW. :)
Totally OT, but one user registration per second adds up to 86,400 new
users per day.
Can a small web server running PHP handle one registration per second?
Answer: yes. Does hotmail.com do more than 86K registrations per day?
Answer: no.
Conclusion: One small webserver running PHP can handle all the
registrations for arguable the largest webmail service on the planet.
Efficiency is not always the most relevant selection criteria.
Regards.
>
> Dan Phoenix wrote:
> >
> > Quite honestly this is a custom form that most of us code ourselves in php
> > to insert the info we need from users. What you really need to do is allow
> > us to pick our own fields...and integrate whatever html we want into it.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Dan
> >
> > On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 09:52:06 -0600
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Inter7 introduces new software: vQregister
> > >
> > > vQregister is new web-based signup CGI that
> > > more than replaces the old vQsignup program
> > > we released early last year. If you're running
> > > vQsignup now, or you're considering allowing
> > > users to signup for free accounts, it's worth
> > > taking a look at.
> > >
> > > We will be adding a new feature very soon
> > > which will be used to collect demographic,
> > > or any other information administrators might
> > > want during the signup process. This information
> > > might include their cleartext password, a
> > > challenge password (for retrieving the cleartext
> > > password over the phone), and other demographic
> > > information such as zip codes, cities, etc.
> > > We intend to make this fully configurable, so
> > > that whatever information you wish to collect,
> > > is easy to setup.
> > >
> > > Head over to http://www.inter7.com/vqregister to
> > > take a look at it.
> > >
> > > --
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc.
> > > www.inter7.com - 847-492-0470
> > > New prices! http://www.inter7.com/prices.html
> > >
>
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc.
> www.inter7.com - 847-492-0470
> New prices! http://www.inter7.com/prices.html
inefficent?
alot of speed and very easy to code.
Take me 10 lines of c code for one line in php.
+ it is built in apache as a module so it runs faster.
Of course c is faster and for any kind of real software it should be used.
But for a website....php is generally the choice.
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:30:53 -0600
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: Dan Phoenix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Inter7 introduces new software: vQregister
>
> Maybe what I said wasn't as clear as it could
> have been. Exactly what you requested below,
> is the feature we will be adding.
>
> PHP is inefficient BTW. :)
>
> Dan Phoenix wrote:
> >
> > Quite honestly this is a custom form that most of us code ourselves in php
> > to insert the info we need from users. What you really need to do is allow
> > us to pick our own fields...and integrate whatever html we want into it.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Dan
> >
> > On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 09:52:06 -0600
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Inter7 introduces new software: vQregister
> > >
> > > vQregister is new web-based signup CGI that
> > > more than replaces the old vQsignup program
> > > we released early last year. If you're running
> > > vQsignup now, or you're considering allowing
> > > users to signup for free accounts, it's worth
> > > taking a look at.
> > >
> > > We will be adding a new feature very soon
> > > which will be used to collect demographic,
> > > or any other information administrators might
> > > want during the signup process. This information
> > > might include their cleartext password, a
> > > challenge password (for retrieving the cleartext
> > > password over the phone), and other demographic
> > > information such as zip codes, cities, etc.
> > > We intend to make this fully configurable, so
> > > that whatever information you wish to collect,
> > > is easy to setup.
> > >
> > > Head over to http://www.inter7.com/vqregister to
> > > take a look at it.
> > >
> > > --
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc.
> > > www.inter7.com - 847-492-0470
> > > New prices! http://www.inter7.com/prices.html
> > >
>
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc.
> www.inter7.com - 847-492-0470
> New prices! http://www.inter7.com/prices.html
>
Apparently some companies devote more time than
others to their releases.
Dan Phoenix wrote:
>
> inefficent?
> alot of speed and very easy to code.
> Take me 10 lines of c code for one line in php.
> + it is built in apache as a module so it runs faster.
>
> Of course c is faster and for any kind of real software it should be used.
> But for a website....php is generally the choice.
>
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:30:53 -0600
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: Dan Phoenix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Inter7 introduces new software: vQregister
> >
> > Maybe what I said wasn't as clear as it could
> > have been. Exactly what you requested below,
> > is the feature we will be adding.
> >
> > PHP is inefficient BTW. :)
> >
> > Dan Phoenix wrote:
> > >
> > > Quite honestly this is a custom form that most of us code ourselves in php
> > > to insert the info we need from users. What you really need to do is allow
> > > us to pick our own fields...and integrate whatever html we want into it.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Dan
> > >
> > > On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > > Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 09:52:06 -0600
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: Inter7 introduces new software: vQregister
> > > >
> > > > vQregister is new web-based signup CGI that
> > > > more than replaces the old vQsignup program
> > > > we released early last year. If you're running
> > > > vQsignup now, or you're considering allowing
> > > > users to signup for free accounts, it's worth
> > > > taking a look at.
> > > >
> > > > We will be adding a new feature very soon
> > > > which will be used to collect demographic,
> > > > or any other information administrators might
> > > > want during the signup process. This information
> > > > might include their cleartext password, a
> > > > challenge password (for retrieving the cleartext
> > > > password over the phone), and other demographic
> > > > information such as zip codes, cities, etc.
> > > > We intend to make this fully configurable, so
> > > > that whatever information you wish to collect,
> > > > is easy to setup.
> > > >
> > > > Head over to http://www.inter7.com/vqregister to
> > > > take a look at it.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc.
> > > > www.inter7.com - 847-492-0470
> > > > New prices! http://www.inter7.com/prices.html
> > > >
> >
> > --
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc.
> > www.inter7.com - 847-492-0470
> > New prices! http://www.inter7.com/prices.html
> >
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc.
www.inter7.com - 847-492-0470
New prices! http://www.inter7.com/prices.html
Not everyone has a single box devoted to Apache with
PHP modules. In fact, many people run a large amount
of time consuming processes. Efficiency is always a
factor, when it can be taken into account. Web
based products should always be concerned with efficiency.
Mark Delany wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 11:30:53AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Maybe what I said wasn't as clear as it could
> > have been. Exactly what you requested below,
> > is the feature we will be adding.
> >
> > PHP is inefficient BTW. :)
>
> Totally OT, but one user registration per second adds up to 86,400 new
> users per day.
>
> Can a small web server running PHP handle one registration per second?
> Answer: yes. Does hotmail.com do more than 86K registrations per day?
> Answer: no.
>
> Conclusion: One small webserver running PHP can handle all the
> registrations for arguable the largest webmail service on the planet.
>
> Efficiency is not always the most relevant selection criteria.
>
> Regards.
>
> >
> > Dan Phoenix wrote:
> > >
> > > Quite honestly this is a custom form that most of us code ourselves in php
> > > to insert the info we need from users. What you really need to do is allow
> > > us to pick our own fields...and integrate whatever html we want into it.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Dan
> > >
> > > On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > > Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 09:52:06 -0600
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: Inter7 introduces new software: vQregister
> > > >
> > > > vQregister is new web-based signup CGI that
> > > > more than replaces the old vQsignup program
> > > > we released early last year. If you're running
> > > > vQsignup now, or you're considering allowing
> > > > users to signup for free accounts, it's worth
> > > > taking a look at.
> > > >
> > > > We will be adding a new feature very soon
> > > > which will be used to collect demographic,
> > > > or any other information administrators might
> > > > want during the signup process. This information
> > > > might include their cleartext password, a
> > > > challenge password (for retrieving the cleartext
> > > > password over the phone), and other demographic
> > > > information such as zip codes, cities, etc.
> > > > We intend to make this fully configurable, so
> > > > that whatever information you wish to collect,
> > > > is easy to setup.
> > > >
> > > > Head over to http://www.inter7.com/vqregister to
> > > > take a look at it.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc.
> > > > www.inter7.com - 847-492-0470
> > > > New prices! http://www.inter7.com/prices.html
> > > >
> >
> > --
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc.
> > www.inter7.com - 847-492-0470
> > New prices! http://www.inter7.com/prices.html
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc.
www.inter7.com - 847-492-0470
New prices! http://www.inter7.com/prices.html
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:57:03 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Not........
and lots of other stuff requoting in full his promotion which, if it had
anything to do with qmail, was only of peripheral interest to a few.
If I was ever likely to be interested in such a product this would cause me to
look elsewhere.
Get off my bandwidth. It costs <ME> not you!
Inter7 writes alot of qmail software that is very ontopic for much of this
list. I for one dont have a problem with them posting announcements....
If your opinion differs from his, thats fine. If you dont like his
attitude, thats fine.
But please dont suggest that his post is off topic and wasting your
bandwidth.
Your whining is wasting mine. Lesson - delete it, or get off the list if
you dont appreciate the discussion.
On Sat, 24 Feb 2001, Rod... Whitworth wrote:
| On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:57:03 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| >Not........
| and lots of other stuff requoting in full his promotion which, if it had
| anything to do with qmail, was only of peripheral interest to a few.
|
| If I was ever likely to be interested in such a product this would cause me to
| look elsewhere.
|
| Get off my bandwidth. It costs <ME> not you!
--
John Gonzalez / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tularosa Communications, Inc. (505) 439-0200 voice / (505) 443-1228 fax
http://www.tularosa.net / ASN 11711 / JG6416
[----------------------------------------------[ sys info ]-----------]
5:00pm up 169 days, 23:29, 2 users, load average: 0.09, 0.16, 0.21
For several days, I have attempted to download the patch that is
at http://www.ckdhr.com/ckd/qmail-103.patch but the server www.ckdhr.com
has not been responding at all.
Is this patch available from any other locations or mirror sites?
--
John Evans
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 07:46:06PM -0500, John Evans wrote:
> For several days, I have attempted to download the patch that is
> at http://www.ckdhr.com/ckd/qmail-103.patch but the server www.ckdhr.com
> has not been responding at all.
>
> Is this patch available from any other locations or mirror sites?
I have a copy of it at http://flounder.net/qmail/qmail-dns-patch
--Adam
--
Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | "No matter how much it changes,
http://flounder.net/publickey.html | technology's just a bunch of wires
GPG: 17A4 11F7 5E7E C2E7 08AA | connected to a bunch of other wires."
38B0 05D0 8BF7 2C6D 110A | Joe Rogan, _NewsRadio_
9:02pm up 5 days, 48 min, 7 users, load average: 0.01, 0.04, 0.04
all you need to do to fix the dns problem is change a setting in your dns.c
source for qmail change the word "PACKETZ" to "65536"
this is according to running Qmail by sams publishing.
i have hacked this code a few times with 0 problems on 5 of my servers
thanks
Jps
> For several days, I have attempted to download the patch that is
> at http://www.ckdhr.com/ckd/qmail-103.patch but the server www.ckdhr.com
> has not been responding at all.
>
> Is this patch available from any other locations or mirror sites?
>
> --
> John Evans
>
>
>
Good evening!
It looks like I'm on the last stretch of setting qmail up as a smart
host. I do have one - hopefully last - problem. Here's what works:
Standard qmail installation that works with SMTP and POP3.
qmail-inject test work fine using TEST.deliver .
Telnet localhost/IPADDR 25 and manually entering commands works and the
message is delivered into Maildir just fine. I have pullmail running on
NT machine to POP3 out of domain acct and shove it into Exchange. That
works as well... My problem is, when mail arrives for
[EMAIL PROTECTED], it is accepted, but the message itself no longer
contains any To: or From: fields. When pullmail pops the mail from qmail
server, Exchange bounces it all because there is no To: field! What
have I obviously missed?? I've used the LWQ and set up the qmail server
using Ch 11 of Running with qmail - Using qmail as an ISP server. Am I
supposed to resupply the To: / From: fields using variables in the
.qmail-default file?? Any help would be greatly appreciated!
TIA
.mark
1.79x10^12 furlongs per fortnight -- it's not just a good idea, it's the
law!!
use Disclaimer;
my $opinion_only;
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001 16:57:59 PST, wrote:
> have I obviously missed?? I've used the LWQ and set up the qmail server
> using Ch 11 of Running with qmail - Using qmail as an ISP server. Am I
> supposed to resupply the To: / From: fields using variables in the
> .qmail-default file?? Any help would be greatly appreciated!
No, qmail will not modify those headers by default. Exchange pullmail
must be removing them or they are not included with the email when it
was injected into the queue. Try looking at the mail in the Maildir to
see if they are present before they get pop'd. In addition, how are
the messages being put into the queue? Are you doing it from a script?
Are you sending it from a MUA? And no, you shouldn't have to resupply
them in a .qmail-default... :-)
Andy
Hello-
I was wondering if anybody had a patch to make qmail-local look in an
alternate directory for .qmail files before going to $HOME. I know I saw
somewhere that somebody had done something like this, but I've been unable
to find it again.
If all else fails, I will just go ahead and hack away at qmail-local
myself, but I was hoping somebody out there could make my job easier.
Thank you,
Ben
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 07:01:48PM -0700, Ben Schumacher wrote:
> I was wondering if anybody had a patch to make qmail-local look in an
> alternate directory for .qmail files before going to $HOME. I know I saw
> somewhere that somebody had done something like this, but I've been unable
> to find it again.
You can use the qmail-users mechanism to reach the same goal.
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Alex Pennace wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 07:01:48PM -0700, Ben Schumacher wrote:
> > I was wondering if anybody had a patch to make qmail-local look in an
> > alternate directory for .qmail files before going to $HOME. I know I saw
> > somewhere that somebody had done something like this, but I've been unable
> > to find it again.
>
> You can use the qmail-users mechanism to reach the same goal.
I saw something about doing that on the qmail.org page, however, this is
really not the ideal solution for what I'm trying to do. My goal is to
make a web based management system for this, and I'd prefer to keep most
everything out of the users home directory, for the sake of security and
simplicity.
Basically, I want to setup another directory that will have a subdirectory
for each user on the system, with .qmail files that are written by the
administrative interface, and the virtual POP boxes for these
users. Similar to what vpopmail does, but in a way that doesn't negate
the ability to have mail delivered to good old '/var/mail/$USER' boxes for
those who would rather use a shell.
Thanks,
Ben
Dear All,
I have installed qmail succefully on RH 7.0. it successfully rceievs messages
and save it in ~user/Mbox. I wan to change it to /var/spool/mail. For this
pupose I used binm2 file as rc. But still it does'nt work and don't send mail
to /var/spool/mail as well as in Mbox.
Now anybody can help me to configure it in a way that it can send mail to
/var/spool/mail.
Kashan
____________________________________________________________________
Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
Say I have a user account for some user, joe. I want to easily
forward his mail. Using a .qmail-joe in ~alias only works if
they don't have an account, but joe has an account, and I want
his mail forwarded anyway. Is there an easy way to do this?
--
_/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/_/_ _/_/_ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ /"\
_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN \ /
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ AGAINST HTML MAIL, X
_/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/.ws AND NEWS TOO, dammit! / \
On Sat, 24 Feb 2001 23:59:34 Chris Cera wrote:
> Say I have a user account for some user, joe. I want to easily
> forward his mail. Using a .qmail-joe in ~alias only works if
> they don't have an account, but joe has an account, and I want
> his mail forwarded anyway. Is there an easy way to do this?
> --
Make a file
Make a file in joe's home directory called .qmail-default and in there
define the parameters of the forward like you would in an alias file.
--
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Chris Hellberg
|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| ICQ #11140088 |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
#include <sig.h>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
That didn't quite work, I appreciate the response though, thanks.
455:adsl-349-23-98-147:/home/lab8> cat .qmail-default
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
456:adsl-349-23-98-147:/home/lab8> ls -pla .qmail-default
4 -rw-r--r-- 1 lab8 lab8 14 Feb 24 06:35 .qmail-default
Then I try to mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the mail appears in
lab8's spool file, but is never forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any other suggestions, or am I doing something incorrect?
> Make a file
>
> Make a file in joe's home directory called .qmail-default and in there
> define the parameters of the forward like you would in an alias file.
