On Tue, 06 Mar 2001 11:40:29 +0100 (MET), Stefaan A Eeckels wrote:
On 04-Mar-2001 Rod... Whitworth wrote:
> Does this have any bearing on his problem? I don't know as I have not
> been following it in detail. The -0000 just hit my eye.
The -0000 is in the MTA generated Received: lines. AFAIK, it's
the standard way to indicate "no offset from UTC".
What standard are you quoting?
RFC822 says that UT representation is +0000
RFC1123 point out that 822 gets MIL tz codes bass-ackwards so -0000
should be used as defined in 822 as operational difficulty or invalid
tz code.
This is off the top-of-the-head but if you persist I'll cut and paste
quotes!
~|^
>From a land where we have to watch out for Northern hemisphere biased
ideas about Daylight Saving /Summer Time reversals.
>From the land "down under": Australia.
Do we look <umop apisdn> from up over?
