Hi
Here are the headers from the first mail and the latest in the repeating
cycle that I have received.
First mail headers:
X-NAV-TimeoutProtection0: X
X-NAV-TimeoutProtection1: X
X-NAV-TimeoutProtection2: X
X-NAV-TimeoutProtection3: X
X-NAV-TimeoutProtection4: X
X-NAV-TimeoutProtection5: X
X-NAV-TimeoutProtection6: X
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 60372 invoked by alias); 14 Mar 2001 15:05:28 -0000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 60367 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2001 15:05:28 -0000
Received: from muncher.math.uic.edu (131.193.178.181)
by mail-1.traffic.co.uk with SMTP; 14 Mar 2001 15:05:28 -0000
Received: (qmail 6398 invoked by uid 1002); 14 Mar 2001 14:59:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 20740 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2001 14:59:45 -0000
Received: from sal.qcc.sk.ca (198.169.27.3)
by muncher.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 14 Mar 2001 14:59:45 -0000
Received: (qmail 20874 invoked by uid 1016); 14 Mar 2001 14:59:22 -0000
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 08:59:22 -0600
From: Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Messages Won't Remove From Queue
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 08:48:55AM -0600
X-UIDL: H<l"!]S!#!$Q="!h6b!!
Latest receipt:
X-NAV-TimeoutProtection0: X
X-NAV-TimeoutProtection1: X
X-NAV-TimeoutProtection2: X
X-NAV-TimeoutProtection3: X
X-NAV-TimeoutProtection4: X
X-NAV-TimeoutProtection5: X
X-NAV-TimeoutProtection6: X
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 34093 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2001 16:56:46 -0000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 34086 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2001 16:56:46 -0000
Received: from muncher.math.uic.edu (131.193.178.181)
by mail-1.traffic.co.uk with SMTP; 16 Mar 2001 16:56:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 6398 invoked by uid 1002); 14 Mar 2001 14:59:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 20740 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2001 14:59:45 -0000
Received: from sal.qcc.sk.ca (198.169.27.3)
by muncher.math.uic.edu with SMTP; 14 Mar 2001 14:59:45 -0000
Received: (qmail 20874 invoked by uid 1016); 14 Mar 2001 14:59:22 -0000
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 08:59:22 -0600
From: Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Messages Won't Remove From Queue
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 08:48:55AM -0600
X-UIDL: [`I"!]LB"!e%)"!Je,"!
The X-NAV-TimeoutProtection0: X refers to Norton Antivirus email protection.
I have had email repeaters on machines with this switched off however.
So far I have received twenty seperate instances of this email.
We restarted our qmail server last night explicitly adding to
control/timeoutsmtpd a value of 1200
as per the mail by \Maex
Unfortunately I had another email account experience a repeat in excess of
47 emails today alone from a Hotmail account. I hope I'm missing something
really simple, any help much appreciated.
Thanks
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Harald Hanche-Olsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 March 2001 16:11
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Repeated Identical Messages
+ dan kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
| Is there some type of confilct between .qmail and fastfoward, or is a just
| a matter of having the .qmail files not including errors?
I don't know, but I know this: It could be very useful if some of you
guys seeing these duplicates tried comparing headers of the duplicated
messages. Starting from the point of duplication, Received: time
stamps will be different.
We need data, not idle speculation.
- Harald
