Yeah, my script is the one with the added comment.... -----Original Message----- From: Ricardo Cerqueira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 11:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Symbolic link to datemail? On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 01:00:15PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: > Matt Simonsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes, this seems funny. Datemail here is a 67-byte Bourne shell script: > Actually... I'm running a pristine qmail 1.03 on this machine... datemail is a 126 byte bash script, using /var/qmail/bin/sendmail instead of /usr/bin/sendmail. Considering the size, I'd say his script is exactly the same.
- Symbolic link to datemail? Matt Simonsen
- Re: Symbolic link to datemail? Charles Cazabon
- RE: Symbolic link to datemail? Matt Simonsen
- Re: Symbolic link to datemail? Charles Cazabon
- Re: Symbolic link to datemail? Ricardo Cerqueira
- RE: Symbolic link to datemail? Matt Simonsen
- RE: Symbolic link to datemail? Matt Simonsen
- Re: Symbolic link to datemail? Ricardo Cerqueira
- RE: Symbolic link to datemail? Matt Simonsen
- Re: Symbolic link to datemail? Timothy Mayo
- RE: Symbolic link to datemail? Matt Simonsen
- Re: Symbolic link to datem... Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Symbolic link to datem... Dave Sill
- Re: Symbolic link to datem... Timothy Mayo
- Re: Symbolic link to datemail? Timothy Legant
