of proving its worth.
From an IT management point of view keep your resouces seperate.
Or one day
you'll be paying for it. Just like the idea of TV with VCR built
in it.
If you recall, there was something monolithic called Mainframe. We then
took to streets
to distribute them....I think it was the push for open systems and
distributed system.
Vendors would use any chance they get to sucker users into yet another
monolithic
environment.
"Robin S. Socha" wrote:
* Tuchyna, Roman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:> does anybody have any experience with migrating from MS-Exchange to
> q-mail on Linux ?Will you take "yes" for an answer? You lose stuff like appointment
management, but you get an Operating System and an MTA that works. If
you don't want to lose that groupware functionality, take a look at HP's
OpenMail (which uses sendmail AFAICS).
--
Robin S. Socha <http://socha.net/>
Note to experienced users: Please don't encourage anti-support behavior.
Don't try to answer questions from users who don't provide the necessary
information. Guessing what they did is an incredible waste of time. (DJB)
-- ======================================================================= Medi Montaseri, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 408-450-7114 Prepass Inc, IT/Operations, Software Eng. =======================================================================
