Simon K. Grabowski writes:
> Is there any speed/performance gain if I inject messages
> directly via /mail/qmail/bin/qmail-inject instead of using
> sendmail replacement (/mail/qmail/bin/sendmail)?
> I know that sendmail command ultimately uses qmail-inject
> to inject the messages so I figured I'd cut the 'middle-men'.
>
> It appears that there are no side-effects provided that
> I add "Return-Path <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> in the beginning of the message.
>
> Can there be any problems with such a set up?
Hard to say what *you* would consider a problem, but I don't consider
it one.
--
-russ nelson will be speaking at http://www.osdn.com/conferences/brie/
Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | Watch out! He's got an
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | opinion, and he's not
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | afraid to share it!
