Brett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does qmail recognize or take advantage of a dual processor setup?

If your OS is multi-processor-capable, then it will schedule qmail's multiple
processes across the processors.  qmail itself is not multithreaded.

> I'm assuming that with the big concurrencyremote patch, regardless of the
> number of processors, we're sill relegated to, at most, 500 simultaneous
> connections.

Depends on your system; conf-spawn can be set higher if the FD_SETSIZE of your
system is large enough, and you have a high enough file descriptor limit.

> We need to send a lot of messages within a short period of time and are
> thinking our best bet is to simply add more machines to our strategy to
> increase the number of simultaneous connections as this seems to be where
> improvement is needed.

How many is "a lot"?  Some people on this list report sending out most of a
100,000 member mailing list in the first hour or so after injection into the
queue.  There's a section at www.qmail.org on large-volume servers.

It's also a subject which has come up many, many times on the mailing list.
Look through the mailing list archives for the results others have had.

Charles
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon                            <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to