* Dave Sill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010411 09:22]:
> In comp.security.unix, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, DJB wrote:
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (D. J. Bernstein)
> >Subject: Re: sendmail replacement?
> >Newsgroups: comp.security.unix
> >Date: 10 Apr 2001 20:22:36 GMT
> >Organization: IR
> >
> >Daniel Roesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> 1) Qmail development is _dead_ since years.
> >
> >A complete rewrite is in progress. Several pieces have already been
> >released. In the meantime, the current qmail version works.
>
> I wonder what pieces he's referring to. Maybe daemontools and
> ucspi-tcp?
[http://cr.yp.to/qmail/future.html]
It looks like he's talking (at least) about djbdns as the resolver library
for future qmail. I wouldn't consider daemontools or ucspi-tcp a *part* of
qmail, unless that's the plan for a future version.
/pg
--
Peter Green : Gospel Communications Network, SysAdmin : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
"...Unix, MS-DOS, and Windows NT (also known as the Good, the Bad, and
the Ugly)."
(By Matt Welsh)
