qmail Digest 17 Apr 2001 10:00:01 -0000 Issue 1337
Topics (messages 60764 through 60814):
Re: POP LOG
60764 by: Rick Updegrove
60765 by: Rick Updegrove
60767 by: Willy De la Court
/var/spool/mail/rizwan
60766 by: Rizwan
60770 by: Charles Cazabon
60771 by: David Young
Re: xinetd, tcpwrappers and qmail
60768 by: I�igo Mart�nez Lasala
Re: "an alias can never override a valid user's deliveries" ???
60769 by: Adam Andrzej Jaworski
60787 by: Dave Sill
60802 by: Adam Andrzej Jaworski
scan4virus without qmail-smtpd
60772 by: John McCoy, Jr.
delivery to local postmaster could not happen
60773 by: Patric de Waha
60774 by: Charles Cazabon
60782 by: Willy De la Court
2 Qmail servers...
60775 by: NDSoftware
60786 by: lenneis.wu-wien.ac.at
60788 by: NDSoftware
Relay test on abuse.net
60776 by: Jairo Marciano Silva
60777 by: Charles Cazabon
60778 by: Tim Hunter
60779 by: John P
60780 by: Jairo Marciano Silva
60781 by: David Young
60791 by: Daniel Duclos
60792 by: Tim Hunter
Adding disclaimer to all Internet-bound emails?
60783 by: Frederic Faure
60784 by: Willy De la Court
Re: clustering
60785 by: Medi Montaseri
60801 by: Andre Oppermann
qmail-popup
60789 by: Willy De la Court
Re: Qmail internal domain routing?
60790 by: Nick (Keith) Fish
[Announce] oMail-webmail 0.96.1 released!
60793 by: Olivier M.
IP spoofed spam - off topic
60794 by: mick
60795 by: Alex Pennace
60796 by: mick
60797 by: mick
60798 by: Charles Cazabon
60799 by: mick
60800 by: Chris Garrigues
qmail-ezmlm: don't want welcome msg
60803 by: thibaut colar
ONLY virtual domains?
60804 by: Sean Brown
60805 by: Tim Legant
TCPServer Error
60806 by: Martin Marconcini
60810 by: Mark Delany
why the connection speed is so slow ?
60807 by: jack
60808 by: Point
subscribing ezmlm list
60809 by: QmailList
Help with qmail-popup and tcpserver (Unable to write pipe Error)
60811 by: Raphael Debeugny
60812 by: Willy De la Court
60814 by: Raphael Debeugny
Two servers for QMail
60813 by: Daniel Riera
Administrivia:
To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To bug my human owner, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To post to the list, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi,
> I am doing something wrong...
>
> run:
> #!/bin/sh
> exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:/usr/local/bin" \
> tcpserver -H -R 0 pop3 \
> /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup smashweb.com \
> /usr/home/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir
>
> log/run:
> #!/bin/sh
> exec setuidgid qmaill multilog t /var/log/qmail/pop3d
>
> The tcpserver and multilog processes started up right, the log dir was
> created, but nothing gets logged, and the POP service deconnects clients
> shortly after establishing the connection.
I am no expert but I think you need the "2>&1" at the end of your qmail-pop3d/run. I
know mine has
that. I also think you "should" use the softlimit.
DJB's page on softlimit http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/softlimit.html
bash-2.04# cat /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d/run
#!/bin/sh
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 2000000 \
tcpserver -v -H -R 0 pop-3 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup \
updegrove.net /var/vpopmail/bin/vchkpw /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir 2>&1
bash-2.04# cat /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d/log/run
#!/bin/sh
exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill multilog t /var/log/qmail/pop3d
p.s.
This guy even uses softlimit in his log/run script, I think I shall update mine asap.
http://www.flounder.net/qmail/qmail-howto.html
For log/run:
#!/bin/sh
exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill /usr/local/bin/multilog t s2500000
/var/log/qmail/qmail-smtpd
Hope that helped
Rick Up
From: "Rick Updegrove" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Oops I always do that ...
> p.s.
>
> This guy even uses softlimit in his log/run script, I think I shall update mine asap.
> http://www.flounder.net/qmail/qmail-howto.html
Actually that is NOT softlimit, see http://cr.yp.to/daemontools/multilog.html
The action
ssize
sets the maximum file size for subsequent dir actions
> For log/run:
> #!/bin/sh
> exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill /usr/local/bin/multilog t s2500000
>/var/log/qmail/qmail-smtpd
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Rick,
On Monday, April 16, 2001 12:24, Rick Updegrove
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I am no expert but I think you need the "2>&1" at the end of your
> qmail-pop3d/run. I know mine has that. I also think you "should"
> use the softlimit.
You are absolutely right rick the logging is done to stderr and not
to stdout so the 2>&1 should do the trick.
Willy De la Court
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBOtrQYv4IaGw3x6aJEQIZCQCgl0Gpg3dK0T2SGkABGSgx0iDln5AAoKze
j6l1Dhl+1cOJWHq5bIBrKbW9
=D0I/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
how do i configure qmail to deliver mail to
/var/spool/mail/<username_file>. Thats where kmail looks for the mail box.
Currently i have a symlink from $HOME/Mailbox to /var/spool/mail/userbox..
It works but still............
Rizwan
--
In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful
--------------------------------------------------
Praise be to Allah, the Cherisher and Sustainer of the world;
Most Gracious, Most Merciful;
Master of the Day of Judgment.
Thee do we worship, and Thine aid we seek.
Show us the straight way,
The way of those on whom Thou hast bestowed Thy Grace,
those whose (portion) is not wrath, and who go not astray.
Qur'aan Ch:1
------------
Rizwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> how do i configure qmail to deliver mail to /var/spool/mail/<username_file>.
Read the qmail documentation. Dan has instructions for /var/spool/mail
delivery.
> Thats where kmail looks for the mail box.
So configure kmail to look somewhere else (like $HOME/Maildir/) for its
new mail.
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Rizwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> how do i configure qmail to deliver mail to /var/spool/mail/<username_file>.
>
> Read the qmail documentation. Dan has instructions for /var/spool/mail
> delivery.
Specifically, in the source, look at the file INSTALL.vsm.
Why not use tcpserver?
My experience with xinetd has been terrible.
By the way, try to set RELAYCLIENT="".
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: jueves, 12 de abril de 2001 20:28
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: xinetd, tcpwrappers and qmail
>
>
> I've read through the archives and I'm still having problems
> with allowing
> selective relaying. Here are the settings that I am using:
>
> -------- /etc/xinetd.conf
> defaults
> {
> log_type = FILE /var/log/servicelog
> log_on_success = HOST PID EXIT DURATION
> log_on_failure = HOST RECORD
> }
>
> service smtp
> {
> socket_type = stream
> wait = no
> protocol = tcp
> user = qmaild
> group = nofiles
> flags = REUSE NAMEINARGS
> server = /usr/sbin/tcpd
> server_args = /var/qmail/bin/tcp-env -R
> /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
> }
> --------
>
> -------- hosts.allow
> tcp-env: LOCAL, .foo.org, .foo.com: setenv RELAYCLIENT
> --------
>
> When I attempt to send mail from localhost (via SMTP) or from
> an allowed
> domain, I alway receive the message:
> 553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts (#5.7.1)
>
> Of course, mail going to my rcpthosts works just fine...
>
> I am missing something in my settings, but I just can't find
> what it is.
>
> I tried using tcpserver and that worked for allowing
> selective relaying, but
> connections to any port from systems other than localhost
> usually took 30-45
> seconds between getting the socket and getting the banner
> from the server.
> There is no tcpserver mailing list that I could find and none
> of the man pages
> or online documenation told me how to fix this problem.
> Please don't suggest
> that I use tcpserver to resove this issue because it introduces larger
> problems.
>
> Thank you!
>
> --
> John Evans
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________
> Get free email and a permanent address at
> http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
>
This message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any wrong transmission.
If you have received this message in error, please immediately destroy it
and kindly notify the sender by reply email.
You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or
copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient.
Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
relate to the official business of Newknow shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it.
----P.S.----
also please remember that users/assign method is not suitable
for us since - for many reasons (our auto-hosting software) -
we have to use system accounts
at: http://www.pgregg.com/projects/qmail/single-uid-howto.php
>>
"If you want to use system accounts do not read this document - it may
lead you in the wrong direction."
>>
so we need one simple thing: qmail should respect what is in global
aliases.cdb file used by fastforward
means if there is configured alias (or catch-all) in one domain
it should sent messages to user pointed to this alias - not to
real user
if this can't be done, then handling aliases in fastforward/qmail duo
are worse than in Zmailer... (brrr..)
----P.S.----
Keith,
Thanks, but I was moved to qmail from Zmailer with large aliases list,
(it worked on Zmailer without any problem) and this is the reason why
now I'm using this shortcut (aliases -> aliases.cdb and fastforward)
instead of any "native" qmail technology so I need an advice on
how to do that with this set of tools...
--Adam
at [16/Apr/2001Mon 00:06] You Wrote in [Re: "an alias can never override a valid
user's deliveries" ???]:
> We alias all of our mail for our server with the domain first:
>
> (excerpt from /var/qmail/users/assign):
>
> =triton-net-ennui:virtual:1008:100:/var/qmail/popboxes/triton-net/ennui:::
> ...
>
>
>=1-800-all-cruises-com-info:virtual:1008:100:/var/qmail/popboxes/1-800-all-cruises-com/info:::
>
> (excerpt from /var/qmail/control/virtualdomains)
> triton.net:triton-net
> mail.triton.net:triton-net
> ...
> 1-800-all-cruises.com:1-800-all-cruises-com
>
> Is this not a viable option for you?
Adam Andrzej Jaworski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>also please remember that users/assign method is not suitable
>for us since - for many reasons (our auto-hosting software) -
>we have to use system accounts
qmail-users doesn't preclude the use of system accounts, it just
provides a more general aliasing mechanism that preempts system
accounts.
>so we need one simple thing: qmail should respect what is in global
>aliases.cdb file used by fastforward
>means if there is configured alias (or catch-all) in one domain
>it should sent messages to user pointed to this alias - not to
>real user
>if this can't be done, then handling aliases in fastforward/qmail duo
>are worse than in Zmailer... (brrr..)
You could always modify the source--qmail-lspawn.c, most likely.
-Dave
Thanks Dave,
of course, I just realized that Keith talked about just qmail-users,
not in context "Single-UID based POP3 box By Paul Gregg"
- I'm sorry Keith -
anyway, it seems that I should start hacking around the qmail :-)
I will let you know, folks, if it will be a success, since
I'm not a programmer of any kind, but if this is the only way...
I will :-)
thanks for your support
--Adam
at [16/Apr/2001Mon 21:14] You Wrote in [Re: "an alias can never override a valid
user's deliveries" ???]:
> Adam Andrzej Jaworski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >also please remember that users/assign method is not suitable
> >for us since - for many reasons (our auto-hosting software) -
> >we have to use system accounts
>
> qmail-users doesn't preclude the use of system accounts, it just
> provides a more general aliasing mechanism that preempts system
> accounts.
>
> >so we need one simple thing: qmail should respect what is in global
> >aliases.cdb file used by fastforward
> >means if there is configured alias (or catch-all) in one domain
> >it should sent messages to user pointed to this alias - not to
> >real user
> >if this can't be done, then handling aliases in fastforward/qmail duo
> >are worse than in Zmailer... (brrr..)
>
> You could always modify the source--qmail-lspawn.c, most likely.
>
> -Dave
>
Is it possible to get scan4virus to scan email that does not pass through
qmail-smtpd?
I am trying to get email sent through IMP (www.horde.org) Webmail to be
scanned.
I have tried setting the Environment Variable in Apache but that didn't
work. I am now trying to get it to work through simple shell scripts and am
not having any luck there either. Here is what I am trying to do:
#!/bin/sh
QMAILQUEUE=/var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl; export QMAILQUEUE
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject [EMAIL PROTECTED] <<EOF
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
virus (SNIPED)
I know the scanner will find the virus I am sending when sent through
Outlook/Netscape. Should this be possible? Is qmail-inject erasing
QMAILQUEUE? Any ideas?
Thanks all.
************************
John McCoy, Jr
Central Systems Administrator
Mills College, Oakland, CA
510-430-3321
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
************************
Hi,
Maillog says:
Apr 16 17:58:13 void qmail: 987436693.474503 starting delivery 57: msg
218656 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apr 16 17:58:13 void qmail: 987436693.474811 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
Apr 16 17:58:13 void qmail: 987436693.498477 delivery 57: deferral:
Unable_to_chdir_to_maildir._(#4.2.1)/
Apr 16 17:58:13 void qmail: 987436693.498708 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
Ok I see that mails can not be delivered to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (yy.xxx.lu
is the server name), because there is no Maildir.. But where does qmail look
for the maildir? The filesystem path? So I can create it.
Here are my account in relation width mail.
pop:*:68:6:Post Office Owner:/nonexistent:/sbin/nologin
alias:*:1002:1001:User &:/var/qmail/alias:/nonexistent
qmaild:*:1003:1001:User &:/var/qmail:/nonexistent
qmaill:*:1004:1001:User &:/var/qmail:/nonexistent
qmailp:*:1005:1001:User &:/var/qmail:/nonexistent
qmailq:*:1006:1002:User &:/var/qmail:/nonexistent
qmailr:*:1007:1002:User &:/var/qmail:/nonexistent
qmails:*:1008:1002:User &:/var/qmail:/nonexistent
vpopmail:*:1009:1003:User &:/var/vpopmail:/bin/sh
Thanks in advance
Patric de Waha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ok I see that mails can not be delivered to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (yy.xxx.lu
> is the server name), because there is no Maildir..
Or for another reason.
> pop:*:68:6:Post Office Owner:/nonexistent:/sbin/nologin
>From the manpage for qmail-getpw:
qmail-getpw considers an account in /etc/passwd to be a user if (1)
the account has a nonzero uid, (2) the account's home directory
exists (and is visible to qmail- getpw), and (3) the account owns
its home directory.
I'd guess that /nonexistent doesn't exist.
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Patric,
On Saturday, April 16, 2005 18:10, Patric de Waha
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Maillog says:
>
> Apr 16 17:58:13 void qmail: 987436693.474503 starting delivery 57:
> msg 218656 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Apr 16 17:58:13 void qmail: 987436693.474811 status: local 1/10
> remote 0/20 Apr 16 17:58:13 void qmail: 987436693.498477 delivery
> 57: deferral: Unable_to_chdir_to_maildir._(#4.2.1)/
> Apr 16 17:58:13 void qmail: 987436693.498708 status: local 0/10
> remote 0/20
>
> Ok I see that mails can not be delivered to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (yy.xxx.lu is the server name), because there is no Maildir.. But
> where does qmail look for the maildir? The filesystem path? So I
> can create it.
>
> Here are my account in relation width mail.
> pop:*:68:6:Post Office Owner:/nonexistent:/sbin/nologin
> alias:*:1002:1001:User &:/var/qmail/alias:/nonexistent
what does the file /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-postmaster contain
if it contains nothing the Maildir should be created under the
/var/qmail/alias/ directory and have the alias ownership.
> qmaild:*:1003:1001:User &:/var/qmail:/nonexistent
> qmaill:*:1004:1001:User &:/var/qmail:/nonexistent
> qmailp:*:1005:1001:User &:/var/qmail:/nonexistent
> qmailq:*:1006:1002:User &:/var/qmail:/nonexistent
> qmailr:*:1007:1002:User &:/var/qmail:/nonexistent
> qmails:*:1008:1002:User &:/var/qmail:/nonexistent
> vpopmail:*:1009:1003:User &:/var/vpopmail:/bin/sh
>
>
Thanks in advance
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBOtsYNP4IaGw3x6aJEQKn5ACfS8y8HTnCvQL967NZcFdMRgLa8OIAnjtO
yIfOQshCjmnMTym6IQTzVJ86
=VA6x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hi,
Can i run 2 Qmail server on the same server with different port ?
If yes how ?
Thanks
=> How i can add X-Complaint-to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] in headers of all
output message ?
Nicolas DEFFAYET, NDSoftware
http://www.ndsoftware.net - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
France: Tel +33 671887502
---
Note: All HTML email sent to me can be deleted for security reasons.
NDSoftware :
> Hi,
> Can i run 2 Qmail server on the same server with different port ?
> If yes how ?
> Thanks
You have to distinguish between the various components of qmail, for
our purposes the programs like qmail-send. qmail-inject etc. that
maintain the queue and the part that listens for incoming mail on
(normally) port 25 which is qmail-smtpd. Both can be installed/run
twice by simply compiling two separate instances of qmail. You do this
by setting the pathname in the configuration file conf-qmail in the
source distribution to two separate values, say first to
"/var/qmail1", compile and install and then to "/var/qmail2", compile
and install. Everything else remains unchanged to a normal install
except that the two instances of qmail-smtpd need to listen to
different ports, for instance 25 and 26. If you have qmail-smtpd
controlled by tcpserver you just have to set the appropriate port
number on the command line. For inetd you have to have two entries in
/etc/inetd.conf for the two port numbers. Note that you also have to
get a connecting mailserver to attach to the nonstandard port, in my
example 26. That kind of setup will result in two parallel instances
of qmail running on the same machine that do not know anything about
each other.
If you simply want two instances of the smtp daemon running that dump
incoming mail into the same queue you only need one instance of qmail
compiled. Simply have qmail-smtpd (via tcpserver or inetd) listen on
two separate ports as described above.
NB: What are you trying to achieve with this? Maybe there is a more
straightforward method.
regards,
--
Joerg Lenneis
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK Thanks you very much.
I try this now.
Nicolas DEFFAYET, NDSoftware
http://www.ndsoftware.net - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
France: Tel +33 671887502
---
Note: All HTML email sent to me can be deleted for security reasons.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 9:01 PM
To: NDSoftware
Cc: Mailing-List Qmail
Subject: Re: 2 Qmail servers...
NDSoftware :
> Hi,
> Can i run 2 Qmail server on the same server with different port ?
> If yes how ?
> Thanks
You have to distinguish between the various components of qmail, for
our purposes the programs like qmail-send. qmail-inject etc. that
maintain the queue and the part that listens for incoming mail on
(normally) port 25 which is qmail-smtpd. Both can be installed/run
twice by simply compiling two separate instances of qmail. You do this
by setting the pathname in the configuration file conf-qmail in the
source distribution to two separate values, say first to
"/var/qmail1", compile and install and then to "/var/qmail2", compile
and install. Everything else remains unchanged to a normal install
except that the two instances of qmail-smtpd need to listen to
different ports, for instance 25 and 26. If you have qmail-smtpd
controlled by tcpserver you just have to set the appropriate port
number on the command line. For inetd you have to have two entries in
/etc/inetd.conf for the two port numbers. Note that you also have to
get a connecting mailserver to attach to the nonstandard port, in my
example 26. That kind of setup will result in two parallel instances
of qmail running on the same machine that do not know anything about
each other.
If you simply want two instances of the smtp daemon running that dump
incoming mail into the same queue you only need one instance of qmail
compiled. Simply have qmail-smtpd (via tcpserver or inetd) listen on
two separate ports as described above.
NB: What are you trying to achieve with this? Maybe there is a more
straightforward method.
regards,
--
Joerg Lenneis
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My server failed in Relay Test 6 in www.abuse.net.
The result is:
Relay test 6
>>> RSET
<<< 250 flushed
>>> MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<<< 250 ok
>>> RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<<< 250 ok
Relay test result
Hmmn, at first glance, host appeared to accept a message for relay.
THIS MAY OR MAY NOT MEAN THAT IT'S AN OPEN RELAY.
Can somebody help me ?
TIA
Jairo
Jairo Marciano Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My server failed in Relay Test 6 in www.abuse.net.
No, it didn't. This comes up all the time; read the bloody mailing list
archives.
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was the message relayed? My guess, NO. If it wasn't delivered its not a
problem.
What part of "THIS MAY OR MAY NOT MEAN THAT IT'S AN OPEN RELAY." doesn't
make sense?
-----Original Message-----
From: Jairo Marciano Silva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 12:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Relay test on abuse.net
My server failed in Relay Test 6 in www.abuse.net.
The result is:
Relay test 6
>>> RSET
<<< 250 flushed
>>> MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<<< 250 ok
>>> RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<<< 250 ok
Relay test result
Hmmn, at first glance, host appeared to accept a message for relay.
THIS MAY OR MAY NOT MEAN THAT IT'S AN OPEN RELAY.
Can somebody help me ?
TIA
Jairo
> Relay test 6
> >>> RSET
> <<< 250 flushed
> >>> MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <<< 250 ok
> >>> RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <<< 250 ok
>
> Relay test result
> Hmmn, at first glance, host appeared to accept a message for relay.
> THIS MAY OR MAY NOT MEAN THAT IT'S AN OPEN RELAY.
Jairo,
No, your qmail is OK, unless you've enabled percenthacks (if you're not
sure, then you haven't, it's disabled by default). Percenthacks control
outbound relaying eg. user@host%relay_host
I think it's something to do with the way qmail first accepts the message,
the test on abuse.net thinks that qmail is willing to send the message.
Regards
John
Thanks very much !!!
Jairo
----- Original Message -----
From: "John P" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jairo Marciano Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 1:54 PM
Subject: Re: Relay test on abuse.net
> > Relay test 6
> > >>> RSET
> > <<< 250 flushed
> > >>> MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > <<< 250 ok
> > >>> RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > <<< 250 ok
> >
> > Relay test result
> > Hmmn, at first glance, host appeared to accept a message for relay.
> > THIS MAY OR MAY NOT MEAN THAT IT'S AN OPEN RELAY.
>
> Jairo,
>
> No, your qmail is OK, unless you've enabled percenthacks (if you're not
> sure, then you haven't, it's disabled by default). Percenthacks control
> outbound relaying eg. user@host%relay_host
>
> I think it's something to do with the way qmail first accepts the message,
> the test on abuse.net thinks that qmail is willing to send the message.
>
> Regards
> John
>
Take a look at this -- be sure to look at the two "Follow-Ups" to the
mesage:
http://lists.omnipotent.net/qmail/200010/msg00817.html
> From: "Jairo Marciano Silva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 13:37:11 -0300
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Relay test on abuse.net
>
> My server failed in Relay Test 6 in www.abuse.net.
> The result is:
>
> Relay test 6
>>>> RSET
> <<< 250 flushed
>>>> MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <<< 250 ok
>>>> RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <<< 250 ok
>
> Relay test result
> Hmmn, at first glance, host appeared to accept a message for relay.
> THIS MAY OR MAY NOT MEAN THAT IT'S AN OPEN RELAY.
>
> Can somebody help me ?
>
> TIA
> Jairo
>
>
>
>
>
>
On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, Tim Hunter wrote:
> Was the message relayed? My guess, NO. If it wasn't delivered its not a
> problem.
>
> What part of "THIS MAY OR MAY NOT MEAN THAT IT'S AN OPEN RELAY." doesn't
> make sense?
Ok, so I'm gonna take a ride in the subject and ask about my relay test on
mailabuse.rg...
:Relay test: #Test 9
>>> mail from: <spamtest@>
<<< 250 ok
>>> rcpt to: <nobody%mail-abuse.org@[200.207.126.46]>
<<< 250 ok
>>> QUIT
<<< 221 nicholas.cybershark.net
Tested host banner: 220 nicholas.cybershark.net ESMTP
System appeared to accept 1 relay attempts
Connection closed by foreign host.
So, this means I am vunelrable to SPAM?
Thank you for you attention and patience!
regards,
daniduc
Daniel Lobato Duclos - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.cybershark.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Money Isn't Our God - Integrity Will Free Our Soul (Sepultura - CutThroat)
No, unless you have enabled the percenthack '%' (see
http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#percenthack for details) you are not a
relay.
Please stop with the questions unless you actually check for answers first.
Daniel Duclos writes:
> On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, Tim Hunter wrote:
>
>> Was the message relayed? My guess, NO. If it wasn't delivered its not a
>> problem.
>>
>> What part of "THIS MAY OR MAY NOT MEAN THAT IT'S AN OPEN RELAY." doesn't
>> make sense?
>
> Ok, so I'm gonna take a ride in the subject and ask about my relay test on
> mailabuse.rg...
>
> :Relay test: #Test 9
>>>> mail from: <spamtest@>
> <<< 250 ok
>>>> rcpt to: <nobody%mail-abuse.org@[200.207.126.46]>
> <<< 250 ok
>>>> QUIT
> <<< 221 nicholas.cybershark.net
> Tested host banner: 220 nicholas.cybershark.net ESMTP
> System appeared to accept 1 relay attempts
> Connection closed by foreign host.
>
> So, this means I am vunelrable to SPAM?
>
> Thank you for you attention and patience!
>
> regards,
>
> daniduc
>
> Daniel Lobato Duclos - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.cybershark.net
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Money Isn't Our God - Integrity Will Free Our Soul (Sepultura - CutThroat)
>
>
Hi,
I checked on the web and the archives of this list, but no luck. Can you
confirm that qmail is unable to add a disclaimer to any outgoing e-mail?
Thx
FF.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, April 16, 2001 19:18, Frederic Faure
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I checked on the web and the archives of this list, but no luck.
> Can you confirm that qmail is unable to add a disclaimer to any
> outgoing e-mail?
>
With qmail-qfilter by Bruce Guenter you should be able to do it.
check here http://em.ca/~bruceg/qmail-qfilter/
> Thx
FF.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBOtskP/4IaGw3x6aJEQI7JwCeJTiF1D589WoLRHfOVKWWfYmX3C4AnRQN
5ISNWtCmB+6NIrbcnEZ+aDu7
=mCpU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
I know of a feature in SGI's File System that launches an event when something
including data changes happen to a file. This might be a generic Journalling FS
feature. In which case installing a JFS might be one way. However I am not sure
of the current state of JFS on Linux. I know there has been many talks including
SGI contributions, but don't know of any current GA version. Maybe others can
educate me as well.
Benjamin Lee wrote:
> Slightly off topic...
>
> I was wondering if anyone has used something like 'watch' or 'stat' (or
> somthing else?) to detect the modification (change) of a file or directory,
> and then trigger an rsync?
>
> Of course, I could settle with a crond rsync every minute or so, I guess!
> I do this at the moment, was just thinking about an alternative...
>
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 05:23:22PM +0200, Karsten W. Rohrbach wrote:
> > Peter van Dijk([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.04.13 10:23:26 +0000:
> > > I have a central box that generates all configfiles and puts them in a
> > > directory called /conf/mail on a NetApp fileserver, from which all
> > > qmail boxes copy their configuration periodically.
> > >
> > > Make sure you copy stuff to tmpfiles and then move 'm (also when
> > > generating files to go into /conf/mail). Especially over
> > > NFS, doing it any different is guaranteed trouble.
> > in several projects i used rsync[1] over ssh (openssh[2]) for distributing
> > configuration between machines (push updates).
> >
> > rsync does a great job, supporting incremental/differential updates and
> > moving the files in place after they have been transmitted and verified.
> >
> > happy easter
> > /k
> >
> > links:
> > [1] http://rsync.samba.org/
> > [2] http://www.openssh.com/
> >
> > --
> > > Microsoft isn't the answer. Microsoft is the question, and the answer is no.
> > KR433/KR11-RIPE -- http://www.webmonster.de -- ftp://ftp.webmonster.de
--
=======================================================================
Medi Montaseri, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 408-450-7114
Prepass Inc, IT/Operations, Software Eng.
=======================================================================
Medi Montaseri wrote:
>
> I know of a feature in SGI's File System that launches an event when something
> including data changes happen to a file. This might be a generic Journalling FS
> feature. In which case installing a JFS might be one way. However I am not sure
> of the current state of JFS on Linux. I know there has been many talks including
> SGI contributions, but don't know of any current GA version. Maybe others can
> educate me as well.
Or you could use FreeBSD 4.x with kqueue support. With an kernel queue
you can select() on any kernel event, including filesystems, files and
directories.
See the man page:
http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=kqueue&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+4.2-RELEASE&format=html
and see 'tail' for an programming example:
http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/usr.bin/tail/
--
Andre
> Benjamin Lee wrote:
>
> > Slightly off topic...
> >
> > I was wondering if anyone has used something like 'watch' or 'stat' (or
> > somthing else?) to detect the modification (change) of a file or directory,
> > and then trigger an rsync?
> >
> > Of course, I could settle with a crond rsync every minute or so, I guess!
> > I do this at the moment, was just thinking about an alternative...
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 05:23:22PM +0200, Karsten W. Rohrbach wrote:
> > > Peter van Dijk([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.04.13 10:23:26 +0000:
> > > > I have a central box that generates all configfiles and puts them in a
> > > > directory called /conf/mail on a NetApp fileserver, from which all
> > > > qmail boxes copy their configuration periodically.
> > > >
> > > > Make sure you copy stuff to tmpfiles and then move 'm (also when
> > > > generating files to go into /conf/mail). Especially over
> > > > NFS, doing it any different is guaranteed trouble.
> > > in several projects i used rsync[1] over ssh (openssh[2]) for distributing
> > > configuration between machines (push updates).
> > >
> > > rsync does a great job, supporting incremental/differential updates and
> > > moving the files in place after they have been transmitted and verified.
> > >
> > > happy easter
> > > /k
> > >
> > > links:
> > > [1] http://rsync.samba.org/
> > > [2] http://www.openssh.com/
> > >
> > > --
> > > > Microsoft isn't the answer. Microsoft is the question, and the answer is no.
> > > KR433/KR11-RIPE -- http://www.webmonster.de -- ftp://ftp.webmonster.de
>
> --
> =======================================================================
> Medi Montaseri, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 408-450-7114
> Prepass Inc, IT/Operations, Software Eng.
> =======================================================================
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
A question about qmail-popup.
Here is a part of the qmail-popup manual.
qmail-popup expects descriptor 0 to read from the network
and descriptor 1 to write to the network. It reads a
username and password from descriptor 0 in POP's USER-PASS
style or APOP style. It invokes subprogram, with the same
descriptors 0 and 1; descriptor 2 writing to the network;
and descriptor 3 reading the username,
What use is it to give descriptor 2 as writing to the network
i'v checked the source for qmail-pop3d and did not find
anything that wrote to descriptor 2.
Are there any programs out there that do use it?
I know descriptor 2 is stderr so it could be that when an error msg
is
send to stderr it is send to the network, but how can you do logging
in this case.
My patch for pop3d loggin disables this feature and send the error
msgs
from qmail-pop3d to stdout(1) and stderr(2) so that the error is send
to the
network and also to any logging program that is used.
Any comments on this.
Willy De la Court
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBOts5Ov4IaGw3x6aJEQLhmgCeIjOtxfd86vlI0QMnyDpH0yU7eqUAoKNB
YTTlokvu4e/OsLpkAoJdyCIe
=Tng7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Iain Morrison wrote:
>
> I was thinking that by assigning sub domains to the e.g. office1.domain.com
> etc... This would enable this to happen via DNS MX records. I would propose
> to have one system as the server that sends & receives all mail from the
> internet acting as a gateway for our internal network, scanning for viruses
> using qmail-scanner and mapping email for the few real e-mail address to
> their internal ones. But I am not sure how to limit only certain users to
> send mail outside whilst allowing unlimited e-mail internally i.e. across
> our WAN!
>
> Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Iain Morrison
How about settting tcpserver to set the RELAYLCLIENT="" variable only
for IP addresses of the users that need to relay out to the net and
having it not set that variable for those that don't?
--
Keith
Network Engineer
Triton Technologies, Inc.
Hola!
A new version of oMail-webmail is now available! This is
version 0.96.1, with lots of fixes and major improvements :
Major changes since last pre-release:
* integrated search engine in each mail folder
* automatic email-addresses grabbing by reading
existing messages
* several new configuration flags
* last login display
* automatic logfile and trash deletion
* and many small fixes as usuall :)
You will find more infos about this GPL-licensed software,
as well as an online demo of latest version under
http://webmail.omnis.ch/omail.pl?action=about
* Download:
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/omail/omail-webmail-0.96.1.tar.gz
* Other URL's: (cvs, releases, etc)
http://freshmeat.net/projects/omail-webmail/
* If you are interested to help, fell free to get the files from the
anonymous CVS, and you are welcome on the devel mailing list.
* There are currently 2 mailing lists :
- omail-news : read-only announce mailing list (for new release announces)
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/omail-news <
- omail-devel : public mailing list for devel & support.
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/omail-devel <
* Detailed Changelog since last release:
16.apr.01 - Version 0.96 - om <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* fixed a bug with perl 5.6 and require
* added 2 more "from" fields in the settings (total=5) - requested by JYD
* added an automatic "trash-empty" freature, and a flag to the
settings screen
* added INSTALL.vpopmail documentation [hm]
* added "save_outgoing_mail" flag to the settings
* composemail textarea is bigger
* added "search" feature! will only look at the first 80 lines of each mail
if searchstring is not found in the headers : should limit the
performance hog when pooling big mailboxes. Currently using "index()" as
search engine: comments welcome (more info in the &getheaders code)
* added error messages for fatal errors
* limited size from user logfile to 20kB
* updated lang files (waiting for translations...)
* save and display last login information
* added possibility to display a welcome message on login (for server info,
etc.)
* added "grabaddr" feature : it allows you to grab all email addresses
from existing messages and to insert them in the addressbook with one click.
* updated some docs
* fixed the charset issue (not sending with 7bit anymore: default=iso-8859-1
* fixed download link and updated about page
* ready for 0.96.1 release
11.mar.01 - Version 0.95pre3 - om <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* added russian [kam]
Regards, and don't eat too much chocolate :-)
Olivier
--
_________________________________________________________________
Olivier Mueller - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - PGPkeyID: 0E84D2EA - Switzerland
qmail projects: http://omail.omnis.ch - http://webmail.omnis.ch
PGP signature
hello, sorry for the off topic post.
real quick; had a server x.x.x.110 running sendmail.
getting complaints of spam originating from that box.
removed IP, still getting complaints.
turned system off, still getting complaints.
Can an IP be spoofed so totally in mail headers?
headers:
Received: from mailserv01.dartgc.com ([207.34.255.70])
by southwind.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA21910
for <x>; Sun, 15 Apr 2001 22:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 22:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ngqjz.msn.com ([x.x.x.110]) by
mailserv01.dartgc.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail
Service Version 5.5.2653.13)
id H5VRZ1Y1; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 01:09:20 -0400
Again, sorry for the off topic post, and thanks.
*****************************************
Mick Dobra
Systems Administrator
MTCO Communications
1-800-859-6826
*****************************************
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 04:00:32PM -0500, mick wrote:
> hello, sorry for the off topic post.
> real quick; had a server x.x.x.110 running sendmail.
> getting complaints of spam originating from that box.
> removed IP, still getting complaints.
> turned system off, still getting complaints.
>
> Can an IP be spoofed so totally in mail headers?
> headers:
> Received: from mailserv01.dartgc.com ([207.34.255.70])
> by southwind.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA21910
> for <x>; Sun, 15 Apr 2001 22:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
> Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 22:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Received: from ngqjz.msn.com ([x.x.x.110]) by
> mailserv01.dartgc.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail
> Service Version 5.5.2653.13)
> id H5VRZ1Y1; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 01:09:20 -0400
How is anyone supposed to give you a sure answer if you munge/hide
relevant information?
The system is off, and has had that ip removed. It no longer belongs to a
functioning system. 207.179.205.110 if it helps.
On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, Alex Pennace wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 04:00:32PM -0500, mick wrote:
> > hello, sorry for the off topic post.
> > real quick; had a server x.x.x.110 running sendmail.
> > getting complaints of spam originating from that box.
> > removed IP, still getting complaints.
> > turned system off, still getting complaints.
> >
> > Can an IP be spoofed so totally in mail headers?
> > headers:
> > Received: from mailserv01.dartgc.com ([207.34.255.70])
> > by southwind.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA21910
> > for <x>; Sun, 15 Apr 2001 22:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
> > Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 22:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Received: from ngqjz.msn.com ([x.x.x.110]) by
> > mailserv01.dartgc.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail
> > Service Version 5.5.2653.13)
> > id H5VRZ1Y1; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 01:09:20 -0400
>
> How is anyone supposed to give you a sure answer if you munge/hide
> relevant information?
>
>
*****************************************
Mick Dobra
Systems Administrator
MTCO Communications
1-800-859-6826
*****************************************
On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, Alex Pennace wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 04:00:32PM -0500, mick wrote:
> > hello, sorry for the off topic post.
> > real quick; had a server x.x.x.110 running sendmail.
> > getting complaints of spam originating from that box.
> > removed IP, still getting complaints.
> > turned system off, still getting complaints.
> >
> > Can an IP be spoofed so totally in mail headers?
> > headers:
> > Received: from mailserv01.dartgc.com ([207.34.255.70])
> > by southwind.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA21910
> > for <x>; Sun, 15 Apr 2001 22:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
> > Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 22:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Received: from ngqjz.msn.com ([x.x.x.110]) by
> > mailserv01.dartgc.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail
> > Service Version 5.5.2653.13)
> > id H5VRZ1Y1; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 01:09:20 -0400
>
> How is anyone supposed to give you a sure answer if you munge/hide
> relevant information?
As an additional note: Looks like every system receiving the spam are
Exchange servers. Is someone exploiting an exchange fault?
*****************************************
Mick Dobra
Systems Administrator
MTCO Communications
1-800-859-6826
*****************************************
mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can an IP be spoofed so totally in mail headers?
Short answer: yes. Spammers are getting better at spoofing mail headers, as
misguided "spam protection" features in MTAs force them to.
Long answer: can't analyze the situation properly when you munge header
information. You might try running the headers through SpamCop or SamSpade to
see if they can detect the header forgery.
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Can an IP be spoofed so totally in mail headers?
>
> Short answer: yes. Spammers are getting better at spoofing mail headers, as
> misguided "spam protection" features in MTAs force them to.
>
> Long answer: can't analyze the situation properly when you munge header
> information. You might try running the headers through SpamCop or SamSpade to
> see if they can detect the header forgery.
>
munge the headers? that was a direct copy from the spamcop message! I
changed the ip address because that ip (and the server it used to be
on) is no longer operational. but thats it. 207.179.205.110 was the
address.
> Charles
*****************************************
Mick Dobra
Systems Administrator
MTCO Communications
1-800-859-6826
*****************************************
> From: mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 16:00:54 -0500 (CDT)
>
> hello, sorry for the off topic post.
> real quick; had a server x.x.x.110 running sendmail.
> getting complaints of spam originating from that box.
> removed IP, still getting complaints.
> turned system off, still getting complaints.
>
> Can an IP be spoofed so totally in mail headers?
> headers:
> Received: from mailserv01.dartgc.com ([207.34.255.70])
> by southwind.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA21910
> for <x>; Sun, 15 Apr 2001 22:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
> Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 22:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Received: from ngqjz.msn.com ([x.x.x.110]) by
> mailserv01.dartgc.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail
> Service Version 5.5.2653.13)
> id H5VRZ1Y1; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 01:09:20 -0400
>
> Again, sorry for the off topic post, and thanks.
Who controls 207.34.255.70 and is it really mailserv01.dartgc.com?
Chris
--
Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/
virCIO http://www.virCIO.Com
4314 Avenue C
Austin, TX 78751-3709 +1 512 374 0500
My email address is an experiment in SPAM elimination. For an
explanation of what we're doing, see http://www.DeepEddy.Com/tms.html
Nobody ever got fired for buying Microsoft,
but they could get fired for relying on Microsoft.
PGP signature
Hi, I recently switched our Communigate (which was carshing a lotand required
exoensive update) to qmail + ezmlm-idx.
Qmail is working great so far.
Ezmlm is pretty good do, even if it's a little harder to get the kind of
mailing list we want here.
We need announcement only list, this is one poster, and all subscriber can't
send anything.
I achieve that ok, using ezmlm options.
However i have one more problem, we get email subscription through an
external system (and have a lot to transfert), and don't want people to
receive a submition confirmation/welcome message.
I found the option for removing the confirmation message, however i can't find
a way to get rid off the "welcome" message ?
How can I do that ?? (an don't tell me that I don't want to do that :-) )
I could do that through an external system (servlet) calling qmail-sub on the
local system, but would be much hapyer to just have to toggle a "no welcome
message" option in ezmlm.
Thank you.
--
***************************************
Thibaut Colar ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lead Java Developer
Qarbon.com
84 West Santa Clara st.
Suite 890, San jose. 95113 CA.
http://www.qarbon.com/
T: 408 792 3800 x 227
***************************************
Is it possible to ONLY use virtual domains? I'd like to do this for
oganizational sake more than anything else (I am using vmailmgr and like to
have each domain controlled under on home dir). For example, let's say I
have a machine named mail.mydomain.com. The MX record for mydomain.com
points to that machine. I also serve mail for anotherdomain.com and
thirddomain.com. What would happen if I listed mydomain.com in
"virtualdomains" along with the other two? Is it possible to leave "locals"
and plusdomains" empty? Does it matter? Would that give me the desired
result?
Thanks,
Sean
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 11:35:28PM -0400, Sean Brown wrote:
> Is it possible to ONLY use virtual domains? I'd like to do this for
> oganizational sake more than anything else (I am using vmailmgr and like to
> have each domain controlled under on home dir).
Yes. I have an organization with about a dozen domains, all virtual,
using VMailMgr.
Tim
Hello:
I have followed www.lifewithqmail.org instructions. The server is OpenBSD
2.8. This was my first qmail installation. At the office I installed OpenBSD
and Qmail and followed instructions and have had no problem. I installed
pop/smtp stuff.
At home I have another obsd box w/qmail. But I can't make tcpserver work.
/var/log/qmail/smtpd/current shows the following error everytime I telnet
localhost 25.
@400000003ada6c2f381c5b64 tcpserver: status: 1/20
@400000003ada6c2f384a0ab4 tcpserver: pid 22092 from 127.0.0.1
@400000003ada6c2f38fae424 tcpserver: ok 22092
localhost.marconcini.com.ar:127.0.0.1:25 :127.0.0.1::17948
@400000003ada6c2f39080b54 tcpserver: warning: dropping connection, unable to
run /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd: exec format error
@400000003ada6c2f392520a4 tcpserver: end 22092 status 28416
@400000003ada6c2f394a6f6c tcpserver: status: 0/20
And that everytime i try a telnet.
I have no inetd running.
If I run /var/qmail/supervise/run manually it seems to start w/no error.
I have make the lifewqmail steps again.. but can't find the error. And the
works is> I did it a few hours ago at the office!!! :(
I use Maildir and have /var/qmail/rc properly configured.
Everything worked pretty well until i decided to switch from inetd to
tcpserver. I installed tcpserver from ports/packages. Also daemontools.
Any ideas???
I run Bash2.04...
Thanks in advance.
--
Martin Marconcini
| Unix, MS-DOS, Windows.
| Also known as The Good, The Bad
| And the Ugly...
--
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 03:43:48AM -0300, Martin Marconcini wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I have followed www.lifewithqmail.org instructions. The server is OpenBSD
> 2.8. This was my first qmail installation. At the office I installed OpenBSD
> and Qmail and followed instructions and have had no problem. I installed
> pop/smtp stuff.
>
> At home I have another obsd box w/qmail. But I can't make tcpserver work.
>
> /var/log/qmail/smtpd/current shows the following error everytime I telnet
> localhost 25.
>
> @400000003ada6c2f381c5b64 tcpserver: status: 1/20
> @400000003ada6c2f384a0ab4 tcpserver: pid 22092 from 127.0.0.1
> @400000003ada6c2f38fae424 tcpserver: ok 22092
> localhost.marconcini.com.ar:127.0.0.1:25 :127.0.0.1::17948
> @400000003ada6c2f39080b54 tcpserver: warning: dropping connection, unable to
> run /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd: exec format error
The error message seems pretty obvious to me. There is some problem
with the qmail-smtpd executable. Perhaps it was compiled on a
different system, perhaps it was compiled on a later version of the
same system. Whatever the problem, your OS doesn't like that
executable file for some reason.
To confirm this, I'd run qmail-smtpd from a command line prompt
thusly:
$ /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
Please do this and show us the output.
To fix it you probably need to rebuild and reinstall the program. I
don't really know whether LWQ does this in the standard way.
> I have no inetd running.
tcpserver is working fine. The problem is that the program it wants to
run (qmail-smtpd) is not running for some reason.
Regards.
Hi,all:
I have built a qmail on my firewall.when I connect qmail from my client MUA,I found
the
speed is very slow.The welcome information will not been seen in a minutes. Why
this things happened ?
and because I use firewall ,there are tow NICs. When I see the orignal information of
the
letter,I found I can see the ip address of the firewall internal ip address.how can i
hide
my inter address ?
jack
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Check your Reverse DNS records. Your client IP's should have Reverse DNS
records or at least the subnet of your clients should be recorded in IP
Reverse Mappings on your name server.
Or maybe, you can disable Reverse DNS Lookups of your Mail Server.
Take it easy.
qmail
Simply The Best
----- Original Message -----
From: "jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 9:00 AM
Subject: why the connection speed is so slow ?
> Hi,all:
> I have built a qmail on my firewall.when I connect qmail from my client
MUA,I found the
> speed is very slow.The welcome information will not been seen in a
minutes. Why
> this things happened ?
> and because I use firewall ,there are tow NICs. When I see the orignal
information of the
> letter,I found I can see the ip address of the firewall internal ip
address.how can i hide
> my inter address ?
> jack
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
|
Hi All Great
I am new this list pls excuse for any
kidding
How can i subscribe to ezmlm mailing list so
that when
I suscribe to the mailing list i should
be directly subscribe to it
Without i had to send any reply
confirmation
Regards
|
I'm setting up qmail with tcpserver.
After several tests I wanted to clean up the config files, but I can't
connect anymore to retrieve my messages.
I try to connect with telnet 127.0.0.1 110 and receive "-ERR unable to
write pipe" after authentication :
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to 127.0.0.1.
Escape character is '^]'.
+OK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
user azerty
+OK
pass qwerty
-ERR unable to write pipe
Connection closed by foreign host.
- Content of /etc/init.d/qmail (start section)
csh -cf '/var/qmail/rc &'
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -R -v -u 7791 -g
2108 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1 | /var/qmail/bin/splogger
smtpd 3 &
echo $! > /var/lock/subsys/qmail-smtpd
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -R 0 pop3 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup
trimaran.com \
/bin/checkpoppassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir &
echo $! > /var/lock/subsys/qmail-pop3d
Any help appreciated !!
Raphael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, April 17, 2001 10:25, Raphael Debeugny
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
[snip]
> pass qwerty
> -ERR unable to write pipe
> Connection closed by foreign host.
>
>
> - Content of /etc/init.d/qmail (start section)
> csh -cf '/var/qmail/rc &'
> /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -R -v -u 7791
> -g 2108 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1 |
> /var/qmail/bin/splogger smtpd 3 &
> echo $! > /var/lock/subsys/qmail-smtpd
> /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -R 0 pop3
> /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup trimaran.com \
> /bin/checkpoppassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir &
> echo $! > /var/lock/subsys/qmail-pop3d
check the paths permissions and ownership of checkpoppassword and
qmail-pop3d
if you using the standard qmail setup it should be checkpassword
unless you replaced it with another version.
> Any help appreciated !!
>
> Raphael
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBOtvz2v4IaGw3x6aJEQL+hQCfeUA9OjLyZTJ2UDWZv/FemJyLTDIAnA8e
KmsHzHIBn4jFzIqX09ucKM6P
=ByX8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Willy De la Court a écrit :
>
> check the paths permissions and ownership of checkpoppassword and
> qmail-pop3d
> if you using the standard qmail setup it should be checkpassword
> unless you replaced it with another version.
It's working now !!
I wanted to use checkpoppasswd.c from Paul Gregg in order to store
passwords outside of /etc/passwd.
I had a problem of compilation of checkpoppasswd.
I renamed checkpoppasswd.c in checkpasswd.c in checkpassword-0.90 and make
the installation.
Thanks
Raphael
Hi, I have configured one server with qmail+vmailmgr, Can I put another
server accepting connections and accessing the first server via NFS? how?
