Jost Krieger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 04:17:47PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>> For instance at:
>> http://sunsite.dk/qmail/tai64nfrac
>> or
>> http://qmail.sst.com.br/tai64nfrac

> AFAIK, (this version) of tai64nfrac is broken, because

>    printf("%lu.%lu ", seconds, nanoseconds);

> suppresses leading zeroes in the fractional part.

There is (finally) a fixed version of my C implementation of tai64nfrac on
<ftp://ftp.eyrie.org/pub/software/misc/tai64nfrac.c>.

-- 
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

Reply via email to