Below, you say that you think the big concurrency patch is useless but in
your testing:
http://www.lamer.de/maex/creative/software/qmail/deliveries/,
your lowest evaluation was for 150 remote connections and qmail's default
maximum without the patch is 120. So you would still need the big
concurrency patch even for your lowest setting and hence, I don't think you
meant to say it's useless. By all means correct me if I'm wrong. I usually
don't know what I'm talking about.
#############################
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 03:59:04PM -0700, Brett wrote:
> Does anybody know the maximum concurrency for sendmail? From what I
> understand, with the big concurrency patch, it's 500 for qmail but I can't
> find any data on sendmail. Thanks in advance.
Dunno about sendmail, but with the big concurrency patch maximum concurrency
for qmail can be as high as 2^16 (okay, you need a few descriptors, but
65500 should be possible).
And from the README to that patch:
> **CAUTION** if you do this one should realise that qmail-send might try to
> open 64K connections to the /same/ host because it doesn't maintain a
> per-domain concurrency.
And as I have posted about 60 minutes ago to this list, I have made the
observation that the big concurrency patch for qmail is pretty much useless.
\Maex
--
SpaceNet AG | Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 | Fon: +49 (89) 32356-0
Research & Development | D-80807 Muenchen | Fax: +49 (89) 32356-299
Stress is when you wake up screaming and you realize you haven't fallen
asleep yet.
