I think the "good-for-all" solution can be SQWebMail: it work with any
authentication scheme (and this can be a starting point when talking about
scalability), can change users password, can read messages from Maildirs and
relay only on few needs.
Other websolutions, even so good, may be limitative: I mean, you have to
choose between pop3 and imap support, php, missing features ...
You can decide only after you have in mind what you really want from a
webmail solution.
---
Cordiali saluti / Best regards
Andrea Cerrito
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Net.Admin @ Centro MultiMediale di Terni S.p.A.
P.zzale Bosco 3A
05100 Terni IT
Tel. +39 744 5441330
Fax. +39 744 5441372
> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: remo [mailto:remo]Per conto di Remo Mattei
> Inviato: mercoledi 23 maggio 2001 5.34
> A: Eric Paynter
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Oggetto: Re: webmail recommendations?
>
>
> Eric Paynter wrote:
>
> > I've just started an email server evaluation to provide a complete email
> > solution including POP3, SMTP, and webmail. We're already
> strongly thinking
> > qmail is a good place to start, but it does not have native
> webmail support.
> > We do not need IMAP. So far, the webmail servers on the floor are:
> >
> > oMail-webmail
> > NeoMail
> > AtDot
> > EmuMail
> >
> > Does anybody have any good/bad experience with these? Do they
> integrate well
> > with qmail? We're hoping to use maildir format. I know oMail
> supports it,
> > but from a perusal of the websites, I'm not certain if the
> others do. Also,
> > can anybody suggest any other webmail servers that integrate well with
> > qmail?
> >
> > Any comments appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -Eric P.
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > arctic bears - the internet - your way.
> > email hosting from US$8/month, domains from US$19/year.
> > http://www.arcticbears.com
>
> Wrong!! Yes it does have webmail support, it's called sqwebmail
> good program
> and very fast, you can also use IMP. I will work with maildir no problem.
>
> Remo
>
>
