On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 08:36:26AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> Jon Rust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm getting these in my syslog:
> > 
> >    .../kernel: pid 93400 (qmail-qfilter), uid 82: exited on signal 11
> 
> segfault?  Is signal 11 a segmentation violation on your OS?

Yes. (FreeBSD 4.2-Stable)

> Is this happening whenever any process injects mail?  Or only when qmail-smtpd
> (and possibly qmail-qmtpd and qmail-qmqpd) inject mail?  If the latter, are
> you running with memory limits on qmail-smtpd?

I don't know. It doesn't happen all the time, and there is no logging
available from within qmail-qfilter. :-/ I'm working on setting up a
test environment to try to isolate the problem. I've got softlimit
capping me usage for smtpd at 2000000 (2 MB).

> Another possibility (given that you're running on PC hardware) is hardware
> problems; "it's worked fine for years" does not mean there wasn't a latent
> problem all along.

Okay, how about it works fine without qmail-qfilter? :-) I only recently
started running q-qf. Prior to that nothing on my qmail system
segfaulted. If I take q-qf outta the loop, everything is peachy again.
I've searched for .core files resulting from the sig 11, but can't find
any.

> > And I'm still seeing them. Bruce Guenter appears to have stopped
> > development of qmail-qfilter (anything related to qmail?).
> 
> No, Bruce is just a busy guy (hence the adjective "prolific" at qmail.org).
> He's still working on qmail-related stuff; vmailmgr is undergoing active
> development.  If you would like Bruce to change his priorities, I'm sure that
> he would be happy to move your pet projects to the top of his to-do list,
> given the appropriate incentive.  That's how free software consulting works.

Ah, bad assumption on my part. He has never responded to any mail I've
sent him concerning any of the qmail how-to's or projects he has donated
to our community. I just ASSuMEd he had moved on. My bad, and apologies
to BG. Offering up incentive isn't an issue. I'd be more than happy to.

jon

Reply via email to