----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 3:36
AM
Subject: RE: big-concurrency patch
I've tried all kinds of -p options, and left it out, and it
doesn't help.
Also, as for it not being the standard big-concurrency patch,
would you tell me which one is? Even the one right on qmail's home site is
that same patch muddled in with the e-mail.
Thanks,
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From:
Charles Cazabon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 15:04
To:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: big-concurrency
patch
Mark Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm having problems applying this patch. I can't find any
documentation for
> it, and the patch file itself
seems to be rather chopped up. I did my best
> to
put it into appropriate patch files, but when I run patch -p1 <
> big-concurrency.patch it asks me what file I want to
patch.
That's a clue that you're using the wrong argument to the -p
option.
However, it could have another cause -- the
patch you pointed to isn't the
standard
big-concurrency one; the message above the patch states:
This is the patch that I use at suse.com. We do almost
1 million messages a
day with this patch and
concurrencyremote set to 400.
This patch comes with the standard disclaimer. No
warranty, it may not
work, etc. But it works
for me :)
It's also not pretty. It's against qmail-1.03+verh-0.02
(the ezmlm patch
l and h patch). So the offsets
may be off a little bit.
So it's not against standard qmail; it's against qmail 1.03
after the verh
patch has been applied. If you're
not using that patch as well, it's not
surprising it
won't apply cleanly. Try against a vanilla qmail 1.03 source
tree.
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles
Cazabon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software
available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
