On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 08:21:13AM +0200, Frank Tegtmeyer wrote: > Bruce Guenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > than the obvious overhead of adding /bin/sh to the execution path? Is > > this overhead significant enough to make such a modification a bad idea? > Are there quoting problems to expect? What kind of problems? The value of $QMAILQUEUE would be passed in to /bin/sh -c as-is, and /bin/sh would expand quotes, variables, etc. -- Bruce Guenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://em.ca/~bruceg/ http://untroubled.org/ OpenPGP key: 699980E8 / D0B7 C8DD 365D A395 29DA 2E2A E96F B2DC 6999 80E8
- QMAILQUEUE patch for qmail-1.03 Bruce Guenter
- Re: QMAILQUEUE patch for qmail-1.03 Bruce Guenter
- Re: QMAILQUEUE patch for qmail-1.03 Frank Tegtmeyer
- newbie question (it's an easy one i'm sure,... John Wolford
- Re: newbie question (it's an easy one i... David Talkington
- Re: newbie question (it's an easy ... Nick (Keith) Fish
- Re: QMAILQUEUE patch for qmail-1.03 Bruce Guenter
- Re: QMAILQUEUE patch for qmail-1.03 Frank Tegtmeyer
- Re: QMAILQUEUE patch for qmail-1.03 Jason Haar
- Re: QMAILQUEUE patch for qmail-1.03 Jim Steele
- Hahaha (hybris) clobber perl script... Roger Merchberger
- QMAILQUEUE Patch for qmail-1.03 Juan E Suris
PGP signature