On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 02:33:53PM -0400, Russell Nelson wrote:
> Charles Cazabon writes:
> > qmail never batches recipients to remote domains. One of the (several)
> > reasons for this is it would make VERP impossible.
>
> Not true. It simply means that the remote system would have to
> implement VERP when qmail-remote tells the smtpd that the envelope
> sender is list-@[]@host.example.com. Unfortunately, qmail-remote and
> VERP-compatible smtp servers do not cooperate in that manner.
> Actually there's no protocol reason why qmail-remote couldn't look for
> VERP in the EHLO tags, and send over all recipients for the current
> piece of email along with a VERP envelope sender. Of course, the
> current structure of qmail-send won't allow for that (even though
> qmail-remote will).
qmail-remote would have to start saying EHLO ofcourse, in that case.
Is VERP a registered EHLO tag?
Greetz, Peter
--
Against Free Sex! http://www.dataloss.nl/Megahard_en.html
