OK, I'll give up on preformance, at least for now. (I can not afford that
cost)
But still I don't like to call a the command qmail-inject for every mail I
have to
send; Isn't there a better way to prepare thousands of mails then to call
the same
command thousands times ?
Thanks
----- Original Message -----
From: "Russell Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gianni Campanile" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 2:55 PM
Subject: Re: many mails
> Gianni Campanile writes:
> > ten seconds would be great, but even one minute is fine.
> > Everything will run on a single Sun machine, no more than that.
>
> Can't be done in that time, then. You need too many sockets. You
> also need to have available bandwidth equal to the product of the size
> of the emails multiplied by the number of recipients.
>
> > My second question was if there is a better way (I've never used
> > qmail) than calling qmail-inject (or any other command) for each
> > mail to send, which seems to me a very time consuming task (find
> > the command, startup the process, execute), even if qmail-inject is
> > very efficient.
>
> As far as I can tell, you're going to need my qmail-merge patch. I
> charge $15,000 to install and configure it for your particular
> requirements. It lets you craft a single message, send it to all the
> recipients, and modify it as it's being delivered, according to the
> recipient.
>
> You're asking for a lot, and it's going to cost a lot even if you
> have someone else do it.
>
> --
> -russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com
> Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok |
> 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | John Hartford, RIP
> Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX |
>
