Mehul Choksi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Many Thanks Charles, I used -H, -l localname with tcpserver and it works
> fine even with the LVS.
Good.
> For the remote concurrency, what I meant to ask was " is it okay to set the
> remote concurrency to 254 without the patch or will I run in to issues later
> on when it really needs those concurrencies?"
Sure, set it at 254. You'll probably never need anything higher. On one
qmail box here, we send 30000 messages a day and rarely get above a remote
concurrency of 10.
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
