On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 10:21:56AM -0400, Russell Nelson wrote:
> J�rgen Persson writes:
> > I prefer to make it reach the queuelifetime by touching the relevant
> > queue/info file. It will then be bounced after one more delivery
> > attempt.
>
> That works, but it would be better if Dan had implemented a "destroy
> mail" option. That is, if the queue/info file is "too old", the email
> would be deleted instead of bounced. It's not too late to implement
> it as a patch now with all the attendant problems.
Sorry for the delay but I've been busy with a Swedish pagan festival
(celebrating midsummer).
The ''destroy mail'' option is a neat idea but I fail to see a valid
need for such a feature. Though I might overlook something crucial since
sleep isn't a vital part of the midsummer activities. I'm quite certain
someone will enlighten me if I'm too wrong...
J�rgen
