James Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So the reason why he hasn't gotten to it yet was because of
> me.. Anyways, he's done everything I have done and he is still having the
> problem.
That's okay. Looks like a simple problem; he was missing a tool (nroff), so
the make couldn't complete.
> I've been told it makes no difference but I always (for the past year
> anyways) install qmail using 'make setup check' then 'make setup' People
> have told me this is repetitve but thats the way I do it (shrug) Question
> now is just for clarification with this problem.. Does it make a diff or
> not?
It shouldn't make a difference. When you do "make setup check" it's like
doing "make setup" followed by "make check". Running "make setup" again when
it's done should just exit with "nothing to do" or a similar message from
make, as none of the files which are dependencies for the targets have
changed.
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
