Re: Logging only undeliverable messages?

[Dave Sill]

Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Thanks for the correction; I'd forgotten that.  I did say I've never
>used it :).

We'll give you the benefit of the doubt...this time. :-)

>Is fastforward in common use?  Or is it primarily a crutch while
>sendmail administrators adjust to the qmail way of doing things?

I don't use it myself, and I have no idea how widely used it is. Of
course it was designed to be crutch for sendmail migration, but it
does look like a pretty efficient way to handle lots of aliases.

-Dave