dssyenon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Charles Cazabon wrote:
> > Therefore, when bouncesaying exited 111, qmail did not process the
> > forwarding directive (&dcn-bounce-log). This is how bouncesaying
> > bounces a message, after all -- it just exits with an appropriate code,
> > and lets qmail-local worry about it.
>
> The man page for bouncesaying doesn't indicate a return code to continue
> .qmail-forward processing. This seems like a useful return code to have.
qmail-local doesn't seem to understand this type of thing -- i.e., I
don't there's a dot-qmail exit code that means "bounce this message but
continue handling the rest of the delivery lines as if it was
successful". You have to use separate dot-qmail files for that.
> My mail server is low-volume enough so I can review all bounces and
> manually forward them to the correct user, say, if there was a misspelling
> in the To address. Suppose I encounter a To address that nowhere near
> resembles a local user. Is there a way to return to sender after the fact
> and have it look like bouncesaying handled it, ie from mailer-daemon and
> with all the "I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver ..." text?
No. The best you could do would be to construct your own bounce
message, preferably following QSBMF, and then send it to the envelope
return path with an empty sender. i.e. do it by hand.
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
