Thank you Markus. This was exactly the problem. The
PIX firewall fixup smtp was rewriting everything and
rejecting anything not rfc821 compliant.
--- Markus Stumpf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 09:03:44AM -0700, Zachary
> Denison wrote:
> > Even though that unimplemented (#5.5.1) looks
> > remarkably like qmail?
>
> Yes, that does. But the
>
> > > > Escape character is '^]'.
> > > > 220 ***********************
>
> SURELY is not. In fact there ist no place in qmail
> that outputs those
> asterisks. It typical for IMHO checkpoint FW-1 or
> Cisco PIX SMTP proxies.
>
> See also the thread (parts)
>
>
http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/2001/03/msg01048.html
>
>
http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/2001/03/msg01169.html
>
>
http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/2001/03/msg01203.html
>
>
http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/2001/03/msg01207.html
>
> There we discussed problems that also resulted from
> the SMTP proxy
> filtering/mangling not RFC821 compliant commands.
>
> \Maex
>
> --
> SpaceNet AG | Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 |
> Fon: +49 (89) 32356-0
> Research & Development | D-80807 Muenchen |
> Fax: +49 (89) 32356-299
> Stress is when you wake up screaming and you realize
> you haven't fallen
> asleep yet.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com
