On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, Bill Shupp wrote:
> on 7/31/01 9:57 PM, Antonio Dias at [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake:
> > I think an include command (##I ?) seens to be the right way so one can
> > simply edit html/* templates and put ##Isome_in_file_relative_to_html_dir.
> > The template engine should include the file pointed by ##I and parse it
> > again.
>
> Why should the text be outside of the html directory? How would that help?
> Where would you specify the location of that file? I like the idea of
> keeping all the html for a specific domain in one directory. You can
> already do virtual domains in unique html directories. I like that you have
> to specifically put header or footer information in the appropriate files.
> To me, that should be enough.
Sorry, english is not my primary language :-). I did not mean a file out
of html/ tree. In reality I said (or tried to say) the opposity: all
included files must be relative to html/ tree. I am thinking about new
themes and more facility to html coders do their work. Perhaps one may
want to include header.html/footer.html in all pages but one or two may be
leave untouched. ##I directivas can give more versatility in this case.
--
Antonio Dias
