I vote for this , definitely =)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Casey Zacek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 10:09 PM
Subject: Re: 0.83 patch
>
> I totally agree with this. I am going to have a real bitch of a time
> migrating my current email system to vpopmail because of the current
> limitation.
>
> Brad Dameron spoke forth with the blessed manuscript:
> > Speaking of MySQL. There is one feature that should be implemented.
There
> > should no longer be a requirement to use "postmaster" as the
> > admininistrator. There should be an additional entry in the database
that
> > says if a user is a admin or not. This would allow different usernames
as
> > well as multiple admin's as requested from some of my users.
> >
> > ---
> > Brad Dameron Network Account Executive
> > TSCNet Inc. www.tscnet.com
> > Silverdale, WA. 1-888-8TSCNET
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bill Shupp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2001 9:00 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: 0.83 patch
> >
> >
> > Ken, all:
> >
> > I've posted a patch that brings qmailadmin 0.82 to a 0.83 candidate:
> >
> > ChangeLog:
> > http://shupp.org/patches/ChangeLog
> >
> > INSTALL:
> > cd qmailadmin-0.82
> > lynx --source http://shupp.org/patches/0.83-patch.gz | patch -p0
> > ./configure <options>
> > make ; make install-strip
> >
> >
> > I've tested it with both cdb and mysql modules, and seems to work.
Please
> > report any issues to the list.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Bill Shupp
> >
> >
>
> --
> -- Casey Zacek
> Senior Staff Engineer
> NeoSpire, Inc.
