On Wednesday, November 13, 2002, at 11:27 AM, Bill Shupp wrote:
Well, as Oden's followup message indicates, plain ezmlm doesn't use it.On Wednesday, November 13, 2002, at 10:26 AM, Oden Eriksson wrote:Well..., as I said, I'm no programmer... I could submit what I have done soI'm looking at it now, and your idea could cut out a lot of code I think. I haven't looked into it yet, but does ezmlm (non-idx) also rely on that config file? If so, I don't see any reason not to go with this.
far if you're really interested.
Tom, what do you think? Do you see any problems with it? You did the most recent overhaul on mailinglist.c
Of course, plain ezmlm only has a few options, so it isn't that big a deal. When I did the last updates to mailinglist.c, I also wondered why the code had to jump through hoops instead of just reading that file. It should be possible to rewrite the section that detects options to use the file for ezmlm-idx, and then manually determine the settings for ezmlm.
Maybe it's time for me to finally take a break from other projects and do a rewrite of mailinglist.c. Implementing the "easy-interface" I talked about back in March would help us all out greatly.
(See <http://www.tomlogic.com/qmail/mailinglist.html> for details.)
--
Tom Collins
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
