Screengrab is in address http://ping-viini.org/~eero/qmailadmin.png
Define true violation? I think that is is GPL violation, if they are making changes without releasing changes to public. At least modified parts need to be avail in net under GPL licence. Since I am not a laywer, maybe some with *more* knowledge can simplify this case? Well. -- Eero ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Eero Volotinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 6:06 PM Subject: Re: [qmailadmin] Possible GPL violation in use of qmailadmin? > On Wednesday, February 26, 2003, at 08:27 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > > Yes. This company is distributing, as least it is selled to some > > companies. > > > > Company is http://www.finmill.com/ . I can send screen grab of this > > modification if needed. > > I'm interested in seeing some screen grabs from their version. > > > You people can push this company release changes to public by sending > > email > > to addresses: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > If it's a true violation and they aren't interested in releasing their > changes back to us, we can pursue some of the following steps (after > giving them ample time to comply, of course): > > 1) Get a story about the violation posted to Slashdot. > 2) Get the Free Software Foundation involved (I think they're the ones > who help with GPL violations). > 3) Obtain a copy of their source code (HTML/images) and integrate the > changes ourselves. > > -- > Tom Collins > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
