Re: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin 1.2.0-pre1

[John Johnson]

This is not good.. This makes it so you have to select to use the new qmailadmin and not use tmda or use tmda and not the new qmailadmin.  This has broken qmailadmin for me and to call it a stable release when something is broken is just not fare.  I am not attacking anyone just voicing my frustration.   -John   ----- Original Message ----- From: Tom Collins To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 11:06 PM Subject: Re: [qmailadmin] QmailAdmin 1.2.0-pre1 On Wednesday, December 10, 2003, at 12:00 AM, John Johnson wrote:  I know this one is getting old, but did you fix it so my tmda stuff will not get removed from the .qmail files? I'm sorry, but that didn't make the cut for this release. It's been 16 months since the last stable release (1.0.6), and the fix to preserve TMDA entries in .qmail files will require a significant rewrite of the code that reads and writes .qmail files. While we're at it, the call to autorespond for vacations will go at the END of the .qmail file to avoid as many problems as possible. We might also support qmail-autorespond as a better replacement. I do plan to put your fix at the top of development for 1.3, and backport it to 1.2 once it's proven itself. If anyone wants to sponsor the fix, I can make it an even higher priority. :-) -- Tom Collins - [EMAIL PROTECTED] QmailAdmin: http://qmailadmin.sf.net/ Vpopmail: http://vpopmail.sf.net/ Info on the Sniffter hand-held Network Tester: http://sniffter.com/