My apologies, I went by the list name on gmane (qmail.admin as opposed to
qmailadmin) and expected the topic to be qmail administration in general.

Thanks to all of you working on qmailadmin!  I very much appreciate all of
your efforts, and again I'm sorry for posting to the wrong list.

--

"Jeremy Kitchen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 06:51, Vic Metcalfe wrote:
> > I have a client who has had a couple of email addresses stop working,
and
> > outlook complaining that the connection had been dropped by the server.
I
> > did some network sniffing and discovered that Outlook was in fact
closing
> > the connection (orderly disconnect).  I looked at the actual message,
and
> > the only thing odd that I noticed was that there was no blank line after
the
> > header.  The message contained a subject line with no body, but there
was no
> > blank.
> >
> > I checked out RFC 822 to see if the separator was required, but it seems
> > ambiguous to me:
> >
> >           A message consists of header fields and, optionally, a body.
> >      The  body  is simply a sequence of lines containing ASCII charac-
> >      ters.  It is separated from the headers by a null line  (i.e.,  a
> >      line with nothing preceding the CRLF).
> >
> > My feeling is that the sending application (appears to be Lotus Notes)
is to
> > blame for not including blanks and the receiving application is to blame
for
> > requiring them.  However, I can't control either of those factors.
> >
> > Does anyone know of a patch or something that would force messages
stored in
> > the Maildir or MBox formats to always contain this blank line?  I'm
using
> > Maildir BTW and haven't tested with MBox.  I think this is the right
place
> > to correct the problem since we can't correct the MUA's and this would
work
> > with any pop/imap server.
> >
>
> I don't really see how this question is related to qmailadmin.  Sounds
> like an OE bug (whoa, OE bug? NO WAY) and should probably be reported to
> microsoft.
>
> Patching an MTA for something like this is a very poor idea, as OE
> should be the one that is fixed.
>
> -Jeremy
>
> --
> Jeremy Kitchen
> Systems Administrator
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Kitchen @ #qmail on EFNet - Join the party!
> .....................
> Inter7 Internet Technologies, Inc.
> www.inter7.com
> 866.528.3530 toll free
> 847.492.0470 int'l
> 847.492.0632 fax
> GNUPG key ID: 93BDD6CE
>
>



Reply via email to