I recently upgraded qmailadmin to 1.2.3 from a version that was a couple
years old (I've already forgotten the version).  I do not have the valias
feature enabled.

In the old version I was able to both specify forwards within the same
domain and also visually distinguish these from aliases in the qmailadmin
interface.

In 1.2.3 the displayed state has apparently been enhanced to eliminate the
redundant domain in the case of a forward to within the same domain.  The
interface also now hints by these words:

> (Account name to forward to
> OR
> full email address if forwarding to another domain)

that forwarding within the same domain is perhaps not permitted.  In fact
forwarding within the same domain does appear to be still supported and
actually results in a forwarding (&) entry in the .qmail-user file as
desired, even though the interface creates the appearance (based on
experience with earlier versions of qmailadmin) that an alias has been
created, since the domain is omitted and that always used to be what
distinguished an alias from a forward.

I'm perfectly happy not having to look at redundant domain in the forwards
list, but I'd like to see some visual cue so that I can tell the difference
between a forward and an alias, both on the Forward Accounts page and on the
Modify page.

Forwards and aliases behave differently in relation to spam filtering, so
this distinction is important.

I'm wondering whether the changes I'm seeing have something to do with the
valias stuff which I have not yet enabled, not wanting to change too much at
once, and because I could find information that made me comfortable in my
understanding of the implications of enabling valias.

In any case it remains essential to be be able to have user spam filtering
work when forwarding to the user in question from another address in the
same domain.  Right now I have to view my .qmail-<user> files directly to
know whether this will work, i.e. I have to assure I have a forward and not
an alias, since qmailadmin no longer lets me see the difference between the
two.

Thanks,
Kurt Bigler

Reply via email to