On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 07:33 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 06:50 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 13:12 +0100, Thijs Cadier wrote:
> >
> > > zlib-1.2.1.2-1.2 is the newest one...
> > >
> > >
> > > On 19-jan-2006, at 13:04, Ole Johansen wrote:
> > >
> > > > yum upgrade zlib
> >
> {snip}
>
> > That said, there does not seem to be any issue with the new qmail-
> > toaster zlib package in CentOS ... at least not any issues I have
> > noticed (I could be wrong though, and zlib effects everything on the
> > distro, including sshd and httpd). I usually never recommend a --nodeps
> > install ... what I did on all but a test server was change the SRPM spec
> > file and recompile it without that require.
> >
> > A long term permanent solution might be a %if statement in the clamav-
> > toaster SPEC that only requires the new version of zlib on distros that
> > don't backport packages.
>
> BTW ... I do not mean this as a criticism to qmailtoaster. I highly
> recommend toaster, and I use it on CentOS-4.x in the corporation where I
> manage the network/machines.
>
> It is just a suggestion to make things smoother.
>
> Another suggestion is to change several files to be:
>
> %config(noreplace)
>
> Files that I think should be config(noreplace)
> include /etc/mail/local.cf
----------^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ <---This should be:/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
