RE: [qmailtoaster] Status 11 SIGSEGV

[Chris Godwin]

I’ve been able to move 100,000 messages into a single mailbox in one day, they all got there with no problems, however, they came from a lan computer on the same network. I fear that there is something else afoot. I really don’t want to have to rip this out and install manually, qmailtoaster has done a good job of including all the features that would take a week to mesh together manually.   Chris Godwin Linux/Unix Consultant Network Logistic, Inc. Get help at http://www.networklogistic.com/help From: Jared Markell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 10:14 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Status 11 SIGSEGV   I've had very similar issues. I was testing the load performance of my qmailtoaster machine. I had my web server email 400 unique emails to my account, I only received a measly 100 or so of them. During the "mass mail", pop3 became unresponsive for me and other customers until all the mails were dealt with.. it was nasty. They were white listed as well, with spam ratings of -100, so I know spamd was not deleting them. The server seems to do fine under normal circumstances, but I do fear one bad spam day the server will be overwhelmed and emails will be lost.   I don't know of a solution. Cranking up the "max concurrent incoming smtp" didn't seem to have a whole lot of effect.   Jared   From: Chris Godwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 8:02 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] Status 11 SIGSEGV Hello all,               I’m new to qmail toaster, not new to qmail. I have a centos install of qmail toaster. I would say that about 20% of all email destined for the server gets dropped by qmail-smtpd, which exites with code 11 according to tcpserver. I cannot determine why this is happening. As a work around, I’m running all mail into a postfix machine, which then delivers it to the qmail-toaster machine. In that configuration I do not see the signal 11. This leads me to believe that it isn’t an issue with the content of the message killing qmail-smtpd, but rather the source in which it is coming from. Has anyone seen this or know about it?   Chris Godwin Linux/Unix Consultant Network Logistic, Inc. Get help at http://www.networklogistic.com/help