RE: [qmailtoaster] Spamassassin how-to improve spam catch

Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:28:40 -0700

 
I did most of the rules. I wouldn't do Blacklist or Blacklist URI though.
 
Jared
 

From: Marco Cordeiro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 8:24 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Spamassassin how-to improve spam catch

my spamassassin still not catch around 60% of my spams even after enable all this features bellow .
any idea to improve domain rules to spamassassin ???
 
BTW, I'm using spambayes on my account and it's a great plug in to outlook. they catch 99% of my spam
after a little training (very easy) , but I really wanna do this by domain not per user. 
 
thanks all. 

From: Marco Cordeiro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 11:45 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Spamassassin how-to improve spam catch

ok,  I enable this feature too and so far so good ;-))
 
(I did the test describe in wiki page and seems to be working).
 
thanks , Jake.

From: Jake Vickers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 11:26 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Spamassassin how-to improve spam catch

Marco Cordeiro wrote:
I did this :
 
-r sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org -r bl.spamcop.net -r bl.csma.biz -r spamsources.fabel.dk -r dnsbl.njabl.org -r relays.ordb.org -r d
nsbl.antispam.or.id -r opm.blitzed.org -r list.dsbl.org -r cbl.abuseat.org
I'll watch for 1 week to know what's will happens

That does help a lot (as long as Spamhaus remains alive), but you'll probably still want to follow the instructions here:
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/SURBL
(sorry, I posted it as URIBL, but it's really under SURBL). As long as you have the memory to spare for this, it's a great addition.

Reply via email to