Re: [qmailtoaster] errors during upgrading qt

[Francisco Paco Peralta]

Erik,

I would try this on my system but it is a live system and the last time I had this libtool issue I was off the air for a couple of days until the issue was resolved with the help of "Shubes". 

Sometimes I just wish I had a sandbox to play in!

Erik Espinoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Could someone on FC4 give this a try:

http://devel.qmailtoaster.com/download/courier-authlib-toaster-0.58-1.3.2.src.rpm

If you downloaded and attempted to test this yesterday, please re-download.

I should have some virtual machines available all the time soon,
thanks to Kyle and Wifi7.com.

Thanks,
Erik

On 10/25/06, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's interesting.
>
> So, on FC4 (at least), libltdl.so is provided by the courier-authlib-toaster
> package, while on CentOS4 (at least) it is provided by the standard
> libtool-libs package.
>
> I'm guessing that there must be some patch to libltdl.so that was necessary
> to get courier-authlib-toaster working on FC4.
>
> So the answer to original question (is libtool-ltdl or libtool-libs
> necessary?), the answer (apparently) is that it depends on your
> distro/release. If you have dependent packages and can't remove libtool-ltdl
> (or libtool-libs) cleanly, I'm guessing that you can remove it with --nodeps
> before installing courier-authlib-toaster, which will replace the dependent
> file(s). Now whether or not the dependent package will actually work or not
> with the courier-authlib-toaster versions might be subject to testing.
>
> This illustrates why it is prudent to run the toaster on CentOS instead of
> FedoraCore.
>
> Francisco Paco Peralta wrote:
> > # ls -l `rpm -ql courier-authlib-toaster | grep libltdl`
> > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 27004 Sep 19 14:54 /usr/lib/libltdl.a
> > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 789 Sep 19 14:53 /usr/lib/libltdl.la
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Sep 19 19:08 /usr/lib/libltdl.so ->
> > libltdl.so.3.1.0
> > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Sep 19 19:08 /usr/lib/libltdl.so.3 ->
> > libltdl.so.3.1.0
> > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 70144 Sep 19 14:53 /usr/lib/libltdl.so.3.1.0
> >
> >
> > Francisco "Paco" Peralta
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> > From: "Eric "Shubes"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 5:44:39 PM
> > Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] errors during upgrading qt
> >
> > Bingo.
> >
> > So, when upgrading the toaster, one might need to
> > # rpm -e --nodeps libtools-ltdl
> > in order to install courier-authlib-toaster.
> >
> > Paco,
> > what does
> > # ls -l `rpm -ql courier-authlib-toaster | grep libltdl`
> > show?
> >
> > (BTW, thanks for checking this stuff!)
> >
> > Francisco Paco Peralta wrote:
> >> Here are the results:
> >>
> >> # rpm -qf /usr/lib/libltdl.so.3
> >> courier-authlib-toaster-0.58-1.3.1
> >>
> >> # rpm -qf /usr/lib/ltdl.so.3.1.0
> >> error: file /usr/lib/ltdl.so.3.1.0: No such file or directory
> >>
> >> Francisco "Paco" Peralta
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message ----
> >> From: "Eric "Shubes"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> >> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 4:51:51 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] errors during upgrading qt
> >>
> >> That's interesting. I seem to remember now that the file(s) was
> > included in
> >> the courier-authlib package for that particular (FC4) distro.
> >>
> >> The files (one file, one link) in question are:
> >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Sep 11 19:10 /usr/lib/libltdl.so.3 ->
> >> libltdl.so.3.1.0
> >> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 24588 Aug 13 00:13 /usr/lib/libltdl.so.3.1.0
> >>
> >> Paco, what does
> >> # rpm -qf /usr/lib/libltdl.so.3
> >> tell you? Does that file exist on your system?
> >> Please do the same for /usr/lib/ltdl.so.3.1.0 just for yuks.
> >>
> >> Francisco Paco Peralta wrote:
> >>> Hey Guys,
> >>>
> >>> All right. I ran the following command as requested:
> >>>
> >>> # rpm -qa | grep libtool
> >>> libtool-1.5.16.multilib2-3
> >>>
> >>> # rpm -ql libtool-libs
> >>> package libtool-libs is not installed
> >>>
> >>> Eric,
> >>>
> >>> I believe the way we got around this problem might have been by finding
> >>> a copy of the missing file and putting it in the directory. Is there a
> >>> way to tell which rpm installed the package?
> >>>
> >>> Francisco "Paco" Peralta
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> -Eric 'shubes'
> >>
>
>
> --
> -Eric 'shubes'
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Francisco "Paco" Peralta