Oh, ok. That makes sense. I thought you were running them both on the toaster!
FWIW, I simply use caching-nameserver (with bind and bind-chroot) on my
toaster(s).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a dns server (bind) on seperate hardware server and I installed
> djbdns on a mailserver. by both I mean the contents of my resolv.conf
> contains both 127.0.0.1 and an ip of my dns svr.
>
> crispin
>> Both meaning either or, or both at once? Why?
>>
>> I don't know the differences in the various djbdns toaster versions. I see
>> that djbdns-1.05-1.0.3 is now current on the main site, and the change
>> logs
>> haven't been updated since 1.0.1.
>>
>> Perhaps EE can clarify the situation.
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> this is the result of rpm -qa | grep djbdns
>>>
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]# rpm -qa | grep djbdns
>>> djbdns-localcache-1.05-1.0.1
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]#
>>>
>>> I however use both BIND and djbdns. that is why it did not bother me
>>> much.
>>>
>>> crispin
>>>
>>>> Erik Espinoza wrote:
>>>>> Hi Crispin
>>>>>
>>>>>> Installing djbdns-1.05-1.0.2 in the sandbox ...
>>>>>> error: Failed dependencies:
>>>>>> djbdns-extcache conflicts with djbdns-1.05-1.0.2.i686
>>>>>> djbdns conflicts with djbdns-extcache-1.05-1.0.2.i686
>>>>>> djbdns-localcache conflicts with
>>>>>> djbdns-extcache-1.05-1.0.2.i686
>>>>>> djbdns-extcache conflicts with
>>>>>> djbdns-localcache-1.05-1.0.2.i686
>>>>> No clue why this failed, I use BIND myself. . .
>>>> Me too. I'm not aware of a djbdns upgrade that has been done with
>>>> newmodel
>>>> yet, so you might be the first test of this. I hope you're ok with
>>>> that.
>>>>
>>>> Looks to me like djbdns doesn't like to be upgraded. I'm guessing that
>>>> djbdns might need to be installed in a fashion similar to a kernel,
>>>> where
>>>> upgrades are installed as separate versions instead of being updated.
>>>> Does
>>>> anyone using djbdns know if this is the case or not?
>>>>
>>>> What version of djbdns are you presently running?
>>>> # rpm -qa | grep djbdns
>>>>
>>>>>> I had to skip kjbdns and succeeded to upgrade in about 3 minutes.
>>>>>> The
>>>>>> upgrade is made easy this way, thanks shubes for a great work. I also
>>>>>> would like to know why zlib failed.
>>>>> The zlib package failed because the version scheme was changed.
>>>>> Originally we were trying to keep with the QmailToaster
>>>>> 1.branch.revision, but eventually we decided that zlib should go back
>>>>> to 1.0.revision since eventualy OS's will release the same or newer
>>>>> zlib than what we are shipping.
>>>>>
>>>>> At that point there is no sense in installing our version.
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> -Eric 'shubes'
>>>>
>>
>> --
>> -Eric 'shubes'
>>
--
-Eric 'shubes'
---------------------------------------------------------------------
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
