I don't know bayesian type filters all that well (yet), but I kinda doubt it. I imagine that the SPAM tag in the subject could be problematic. In addition, as the dates age, I expect that would have some impact too.
Not entirely a bad idea though, having a corpus of mail for training new installations. Perhaps these issues could be solved in a way that it would work well. Fernando Azevedo wrote: > Hi all!! > > After reading this thread something poped up in the back of my mind: would it > be possible to tap a message based in the subject instead??? The reason for > this would be tapping all messages marked as SPAM and have them BCC'ed to a > speacial account/folder so that they could me analyzed and and used leater > for training the spamassassin filters as HAM or SPAM. It might come in handy > when setting up new servers where the filters are not trained yeat. > > > Cheers, > Fernando > > -----Original Message----- > From: Gabriel Lai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sat 11/18/2006 6:22 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] BCC Function > > Thanks Bill... I got it :) > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Bill Kwok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 6:45:10 PM > Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] BCC Function > > > Hi Gabriel, > > You can use control/taps: http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Taps > > Best regards, > Bill > > > On 11/17/06, Gabriel Lai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all, > > I remember that there's a function in qmail that enables us to archieve the > email address to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > How can I write the policy? > > Please assist. > -- -Eric 'shubes' --------------------------------------------------------------------- QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
