Hi,

Problem may be because of static ip. Maybe they listed
some ip ranges as suspicious mail sender.

And a question, i did reverse dns look up at:

http://remote.12dt.com/

and it resulted my ip to my domain adress. Good or
not? Should it be to "mail.mydomain.com" or only
"mydomain.com"?

And did you search for microsoft site for rigth
"sender id" setup? They had a guide for rigth "spf"
dns setup.

Thanks a lot...






--- "Eric \"Shubes\"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Check out dyndns.org. My server is on a dynamic IP
> address, and I don't have
> any problem (that I know of). I use their customdns
> service for my dns, and
> selectively use their mailhop service (for domains
> that block dynamic IPs).
> Both services are quite affordable, and well worth
> it. I've had no problems
> with dyndns.org, and their site is simple to use.
> 
> Brad Fuller wrote:
> > Thank you for the replies, fellas.
> > 
> > I'm pretty sure the reason that our messages are
> flagged is because we are
> > using the IP given to us by our local cable
> company, and do not have the
> > ability to add a reverse DNS entry that matches
> our domain.
> > 
> > I found this post while skimming some of the
> forums online for a possible
> > answer.
> > 
> > [snip]
> > 
> > Make sure the reverse DNS for your server matches
> the forward DNS and that
> > both resolve to a server name that is not
> obviously a dynamic IP address.
> > 
> > Mail from a machine named
> customer43.dsl.bigisp.com tends to get weighted as
> > spam for reasons which should be obvious.
> > 
> > [/snip]
> > 
> > We have already tried to get our cable company to
> add the reverse DNS for
> > us, but they said they "can't" (or won't)
> > 
> > Sending through their SMTP server is not an
> option.
> > 
> > So, in other words, I think we are pretty much
> SOL.
> > 
> > I'm a newbie to DNS, but from my understanding
> reverse DNS is not something
> > we can do ourselves without the help of our ISP. 
> Please correct me if I am
> > wrong.
> > 
> > - Brad
> > 
> > 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: bb. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 7:47 AM
> >> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> >> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Need help with
> hotmail and yahoo junk folders
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> After some works i did, we could reach in Yahoo
> Inbux.
> >> The way:
> >>
> >> 1- Be sure your ip / domain is NOT in black list.
> >> 2- SPF record (Maybe reverse DNS needed).
> >> 3- Send emails a couple times to Yahoo accounts
> and
> >> always say that this is NOT Bulk.
> >>
> >> So, Yahoo LEARNS that and next times, no problems
> with
> >> other adresses (No need to add to adress book).
> >>
> >> But about Hotmail, i do not know. I tried a
> little but
> >> failed. Maybe you can try like above and TEACH
> HOTMAIL
> >> that it is not Junk. Hotmail has SPF guide how to
> set
> >> it up correctly (I do not remember exact web
> adress of
> >> it). I tried DIFFERENT DNS SPF setups, failed.
> Please
> >> alert here if you can success in Hotmail.
> >>
> >> In linux shell:
> >>
> >> host -t txt hotmail.com
> >>
> >> results:
> >>
> >> hotmail.com descriptive text "v=spf1
> >> include:spf-a.hotmail.com
> include:spf-b.hotmail.com
> >> include:spf-c.hotmail.com
> include:spf-d.hotmail.com
> >> ~all"
> >>
> >> Maybe helps. Our DNS records has both spf1 and
> spf2.0
> >> but fails.
> >>
> >> If God permits, all can be done by...
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --- Al Adcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> > Hi Brad:
> > 
> > What's in /var/qmail/control/smtproutes?  It
> should
> > look like this:
> > 
> > :smtp.rr.net (or whatever you smtp server is for
> > RoadRunner).
> > 
> > That way, your local toaster will pass along smtp
> > traffic to your ISP
> > and various and sundry testing to make sure that
> the
> > mail is coming from
> > a reliable source won't fail.  Someone on the list
> > that knows more can
> > explain better, I'm sure.
> > 
> > Good luck!
> > 
> > Al
> > 
> > Brad Fuller wrote:
> >>>>> Hello, list.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I recently installed qmailtoaster on a CentOS
> 4
> > box.
> >>>>> I followed the instructions here:
> >>>>>
> >>>
>
http://www.qmailtoaster.com/centos/cnt40/EZ-QmailToaster-CentOS-4.3.txt
> >>>>> The server is here in our local office, and is
> > connected to a router which
> >>>>> is connected to our cable modem through Time
> > Warner cable.  We have a
> >>>>> business account which gives us a static IP
> (but
> > it's still RoadRunner)
> >>>>> We also have a dedicated server (different
> domain)
> > managed by a hosting
> >>>>> company located elsewhere.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> When we send e-mail to hotmail and yahoo users
> > from our dedicated server,
> >>>>> they go to the inbox.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sending from the new mail server hosted by us
> > locally, always results in the
> >>>>> message appearing in the user's junk folder. 
> Even
> > if it is just plain text
> >>>>> with no links, etc. (i.e. "Testing 123")
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I made sure to add SPF and DomainKeys to the
> DNS
> > records.
> >>>>> I have run reports from dnsstuff.com and
> > mxtoolbox.com and everything seems
> >>>>> to be configured properly.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Can anyone think of a reason why this is
> > happening?
> >>>>> Any advice is much appreciated.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Brad
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> -Eric 'shubes'
> 
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
>      QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted
> <http://www.vr.org>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
=== message truncated ===


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
     QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to